Now imagine what would eventually happen if he began showing filmed religious debates, but he also let himself get tagged as a person who’s just exploiting the public library for his religious spin. That would just as likely be a difficult position for the library staff.
Yes, what I’ve said here may sound strange, but it’s about priorities and patience. Build pro-White community with dialogue. Let the truth emerge from community building. Have absolutely no fear about even losing and the opponents of White community will be confounded.
We gather to claim our European histories, and no one will be surprised that our German-American supporters want us to look into this – whatever the outcome. A debate period may become heated, so consider setting a time limit. Thank everyone for coming, as long as they behave, even if they said they’re in absolute disagreement. Do this and the negative stereotypes about us will eventually evaporate.
Anyone desiring to explore the use of dialogue will find a few books out there, including: ‘Dialogue – A Pioneering Approach to Communicating In Business and In Life’ by William Isaacs, New York, New York; Doubleday – Random House 1999 I was fascinated by the fact that my own used copy of this book seems to have once been the property of an opponent, who left a leaflet within its jacket criticising “White Privilege.’
Answer: The core of a PLE – as is the case with the political/cultural/lifestyle communities of our competitors and opponents – is its businesses and fraternal organizations; as they facilitate social networking
<b>Question: Should the PLE organizer develop any kind of security or rule enforcement team</b>
Answer: It is best to leave such things to the various purists who will participate, as their methods will differ and subject them to varying levels of legal liability. Instead of that, maintain enough intelligence collecting operatives that you can watch over the entire target area. For example, during the 1932 Bonus march on Washington DC (which soon became a call for a third way government by their Khaki Shirt organizers), the populist leader Walther Waters developed a personal network of some 300 volunteers, so he was usually aware of what his opponents were doing anywhere in the city. It was not necessary for his participants to know the other operatives. Your own volunteers do need, however, to be aware that they are only “observing and reporting” – and aren’t enforcers. You’ll soon discover the truth of the adage that ”Knowledge is power.”
<b>Question: Although we’re nearly all Stormfronters, populists, and other types of pro-White people here, our opponents are sometimes resorting to below the belt propaganda about us being nazis, fascists, white supremacists, haters and all that. How should we respond to those who occasionally find confirmation because of the opportunistic cultists who may also be drawn to this type of open community?</b>
Answer: In the beginning we need to be especially touchy about our image, but later when we’re strong that kind of nonsense will be much less important because close observers will know us better.
There’s actually nothing in the PLE prospectus that promotes those kinds of things, so let any inquirers know that a very long time ago a man named Jesus (or was it Odin?) went among the lepers and sinners to do his father’s business, and those who opposed him also implied that he was as untouchable as them.
<b>Question: After a PLE supporter arrives in the target area, and gets settled in, what should they expect to happen occasionally?</b>
Answer: Based on what we know of all the political/cultural/lifestyle communities that have come before, a period of overreaction from a few of our opponents will occur. A certain amount of hysteria will arise from an excitable minority that fears the unknown (Oh my gosh, they’re under the bed), and a few may cross the line to break the law.
<b>Question: What preparations should our people make for dealing with this initial period of hysteria that’s almost certain to occur?</b>
Answer: At the very minimum each should keep a writing pad and pen, and ideally a camera and pocket tape recorder. These are for recording the dates and times of every instance of harassment. What you think is a small matter and shrug off, and do not record, can actually turn out to be a valuable part of the big picture later, so be a faithful record keeper of license plates and descriptions. It’s possible to collect enormous monetary damages in circumstances like these.
<b>Question: And what if someone makes hate calls in the night about me being part of the conscious White community (PLE), and actually throws a brick through my window, should I grab a weapon and jump into my car to catch them?</b>
Answer: No, don’t do anything like that, as it may turn out to be the relative of a person with deeper roots than you in that town or law enforcement. Instead, what you should do is to take a deep breath to calm yourself down, count to ten, and then say “Thank you Lord” (or Odin) because now you’ve received visible evidence that our civil rights are being obstructed by intimidation.
Then go ahead and report this incident to the police – as a hate crime. It does not matter whether they think it’s a hate crime, it just matters that you in your heart know it is. Following that, perhaps in the morning, contact the local media (all of them), and tell them that you have filed a hate crime report with the police.
If they send a reporter to get a picture of the window, you may want to stand out of the way for your future safety. The reporter will ask you about the hate calls, which will confirm the cause, and may ask you if it’s true that you are with the Pioneer Little Europe community. Again for your safety, you may decline to state, or say you don’t hold an actual membership card in anything like that because it’s simply a word to define a “conscious White community.”
<b>Question: Occasionally we enounter self-described mililtants in the open community who reject populism and its modern interpretation in PLE legionism (a somewhat democratic national socialism). These urge WNs to go out and “do things” that they are unwilling to do themselves. How should we handle that kind of behavior?</b>
Answer: By rejecting PLE’s call to raise up a WN community worth defending, they are signalling that they want WNs to die for the exsting type of White community. Their existing type of White community, however, would not only not say “thank you” but would try to hunt such “lunatic champions” down. Considering all that, treat such want-to-be friends as agent provocatuers to be avoided like the plague. A true comrade, from a real community and not a cult, doesn’t treat his fellow WNs as cannonfodder; so engage the Amish practice of shunning if they won’t listen to reason.
<b>Question: What should we do about any merchants in the target area who not only oppose our right to be a community but who also refuse to stock the kind of merchandise that the PLE community wants?</b>
Answer: In the past White Nationalists were powerless to do anything about them at all, however, now that we’re contentrated in the target area we can launch an effective boycott until they come to their senses – or find a community that wants what they’re selling.
<b>Question: If I want to put together a press release on an incident, is that difficult?</b>
Answer: It’s actually quite easy, and here is the simple outline that I use for making them. On one occasion my local paper liked the suggested story so much that they ran it on the center of their front page; adding a large drawing of their own to boot! Begin with a piece of paper that’s about 8X10. Now at the top in really giant sized letters just print “Press Release.”
Then down the left hand side use a column of smaller size words that say “Who, What, Where, When, How, Why.” Then in normal letters type in the information, being sure to provide the ways to contact you even late in the evening. You can also write “exclusive for the next eight hours,” or something similar, if you’re emotionally invested in getting that particular media source to cooperate.
Keep in mind that there is such a thing as too much information, or too little information, when trying to draw the attention of an overworked person glancing through a big load of these coming in. When you like what you see, go ahead and fax it to the media. After that’s done, go ahead and telephone that newspaper or television station to let them know you’ve just faxed a press release.
And it’s quite possible that the person who answers your call, who’s often trained to spot opportunities, will either ask you about the subject right off the bat or will refer you to a reporter at their desk who’s better prepared to hear your pitch.
<b>Question: And what if someone begins to stalk one of our participants, but never really does anything that is otherwise illegal?</b>
Answer: That victim should be collecting all the information possible, even if it takes awhile and the assistance of someone else. What is needed is the name of the stalker, their address, and a list of the incidents with all the dates and times included.
When the information has been gathered, then it’s possible to file for a restaining order without even using the services of an attorney. The form is usually available at the local city hall or courthouse, and after you fill it out it’s given to the clerk for filing a request for a hearing before a judge. When you’re notified of the date and time, be sure to show up, as the person who fails to show generally loses the contest. Everything depends on how well you’ve been documenting the harassment, so bring along any documentation you’re been able to collect.
After you’ve got the restaining order issued by the judge you’ll be in a stronger position than ever before, as the stalker will simply be arrested if they insist on violating the terms in regard to how much distance you’ve been able to negotiate. Judges usually like to keep the distance as small possible, as they realize that even a stalker may have legitimate business in a large area.
<b>Question: If we’re not intentionally breaking any known law, and cautioning our supporters to be good citizens, are we in the clear?</b>
Answer: Unfortunately, based on my personal experiences working alongside David Duke in New Orleans, I can tell you that there’s probably going to be a certain amount of curiosity from law enforcement. In other words, although you may think you’re a good driver, you’ll have to be especially diligent about observing the local traffic laws. In a two day period, for example, David Duke and I once had to take turns gathering up bail money for rescuing each other from traffic jail.
There are usually a lot of normal people in traffic jail, so don’t freak out if it happens. In fact, I had one fellow prisoner who was so mad at the authorities that he offered to help bail me out before David arrived. In my own case, a cop stopped me – along with many other drivers – just to say that a new red arrow had been installed hours before.
And when I failed to come up with my driver’s license for this “courtesy stop,” as I had left it at home, he directed me into the patrol car. As you can see, I should have been more careful, but the case was dismissed as soon as the judge was able to see the driver’s license. When it comes to traffic stops, this kind of thing can often be avoided by carrying your license and staying very alert.
* Those of you who are not planning to go into a PLE area for the immediate future may want to contact any PLE organizer known to you and donate whatever you can for a legal defense fund. Keep in mind that these organizers are often idealists who are inclined to be givers and not takers, but unexpected expenses can hurt them or their families enough to put them out of action permanently.
<b>Question: As most of the PLE supporters are just ordinary Americans who have never publicly participated in a civil rights movement before, what should they know if they’re targeted for a more overt harassment?</b>
Answer: Issue each of your people a copy of the Miranda Warning. This can be printed on the back of a business card or paper, and there are longer versions. It can save them from a lot of self-inflicted grief as a result of innocently over-cooperating with authorities:
<i>”You have a right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have a right to speak to an attorney, and to have an attorney present during any questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided to you at government expense.”</i>
Or here’s another version from the back of a court-delegated defense attorney’s business card:
<i>”I invoke my rights as guaranteed by the fourth, fifth, sixth and fourteenth amendments of the United States Constituion, in their entirety. Therefore, I do not consent to any search of my person, my premises, my car, my effects, or the location of my arrest. I also invoke my right to remain silent and to have my lawyer present during any questioning or line up.</i>
In other words, if your car is stopped or a policeman visits your residence, at some point the officer often says: “Is it ok if I look in there?” And you can only blame yourself if there really is something – or someone – more interesting to find, as you have a right to say “No.” And it may seem odd, but all officers are trained to respect it. In fact, if you keep it polite, they will respect you for not being a fool.
<b>Question: I see, we’re generally starting out as the outsiders but are aiming at having our full civil rights acknowledged as individuals and a community.</b>
Answer: Yes, and it’s absolutely vital that every arriving PLE supporter be told the requirements for eventually voting at the first opportunity. In the initial stages of a PLE, but not necessarily on all future occasions, we’ll want to create at least a small coordinated voting block; so begin shopping around for friendly politicans who would value the power of a conscious White community (PLE) that’s solidly behind them.
Keep in mind that countless elections in small towns have been won by just a handful of votes. Initially it does not matter which local party presents the most accommodating candidate, as our long-range goal is to swamp or dominate each of them.
<b>Question: Most of us realize that a civil rights movement, even on behalf of a conscious White community, is largely a defensive game, but as some of the bravest and most fearless people in all of the movement’s history are here now among us what should we do if someone with the establishment asks us to tone down anyone who gets rowdy?</b>
Answer: Although legally we are not our brother’s or sister’s keepers (unless we want to be), if you feel that the authority that’s asking is supportive of our right to be a community without harassment, then do what you can to negotiate a calming down.
On the other hand, if a hostile representative of the establishment mistakes you for a cowering lackey, and wants only to use you to herd the casualities they’re creating (angry and isolated Whites denied their basic human right to flex an ethnic community profile, while that same right is being granted to Asians in Chinatowns, Indians on reservations, and Blacks in their communities), then inform them that the reason for your “powerlessness” or lack of influence is a second class American citizenship and go about your personal or “individual” business.
<strong>The PLE Guide to White Civil Rights</strong> <hr size=”1″ style=”background-color: #d1d1e1; color: #d1d1e1;” />
Our proposal is to enable women to make this decision for themselves in a supportive pro-White environment (A PLE, or new model White community). Many would then freely return home, but those who decided to remain in the workplace should not be interfered with in any way or be subject to any devaluation.
<strong>PLEs & The West </strong>The following questions and answers examine the PLE building strategy within the context of Western Civilization:</div>
<b>Question: As there’s a distinct resemblance between PLEs and the “polis” or city-state of ancient Greece, judging by the emphasis placed on establishing speakers forums, are PLEs intended to somehow mimic them?</b>
Answer: No, because the West constantly evolves its forms. PLEs are actually inspired by a close observation of how our competitors and opponents routinely displace us, so any resemblance to a polis in ancient Greece merely confirms that we’re doing the right thing.
<b>Question: Patrick Buchanan wrote a book with the pessimistic title of ‘The Death of the West.’ Is it really too late for us to do anything?</b>
Answer: It’s the publishers who usually decide a book’s title, and so what Buchanan actually says in that book is the following:
“Traditionalists should emulate Roman converts. The empire still merited their allegiance, but they separated themselves from old comrades and customs and created a new Christian culture in their own families and within the fellowship of the converted.”
In other words, Buchanan’s view is that the present form of the West is dying but he recommends forming a new one.
Answer: Pioneer Little Europes are advocated as the seed of a future form of Western Civilization, but it’s still too early to know which traditional Christian values will be carried over.
<b>Question: Buchanan has both feet firmly planted in the system, and isn’t a militant, so how does PLE compare on that aspect?</b>
Answer: The only official militant creed in a PLE is Legionism in its military-veteran and cultural forms, and that acts as an umbrella tradition for all White Nationalists – whatever their personal beliefs about better or more radical alternatives.
<b>Question: In 5th century BC Pericles created an enormous home for the gods on the Acropolis, and its center of attraction was the Parthenon that’s still there today, so what did Pericles have in his approach that we would find useful </b>
Answer: Pericles went about things in a manner that could be compared to such successful American leaders as Long and Roosevelt (or even the more positive social building phase of Europe’s prewar fascisms and national socialism), as those projects on the Acropolis inspired people to work together. And PLEs will deliver similar results, as the energies and special values of our own people are released for a cultural revival.
<b>Question: Aren’t PLEs really too small scale for us, especially when compared to the power and grandeur of the Roman Empire?</b>
Answer: At its high point Rome was impressive, but historians have also determined that it started as one little town. And who would ever have projected that the humble and impoverished followers of a religious sect would inherit it in its maturity?
<b>Question: In the PLE Prospectus there’s a statement that says “In the beginning was the word.” Was that particular PLE idea derived from the Judeo-Christian tradition or National Socialist Germany, as we see it in both?</b>
Answer: That actually begins, appropriately, before the rise of Western Civilization. Thoth is an Egyptian god of letters (among other attributes), and represents the insight that society’s existence is dependent on a peculiar metaphysic of words and meanings. The Greeks called Thoth “Hermes Trismegistus.”
Later this insight shows up in the Jewish holiday story of Hannakah, where lights symbolize words and Jews are reminded that they must remain lit for Jewish survival. Then this shows up in the New Testament gospel of John, and Germany’s National Socialists repeat it early in the twentieth century.
<b>Question: You’ve said that the Old White community doesn’t fit the correct definition of an ETHNIC GROUP (as in race and culture), because it doesn’t maintain its territorial integrity, but that PLEs would fit the requirement by raising up an uncontrolled White Nationalist culture that repels outsiders. Is there a precedent anywhere for this more detailed approach to defining a community?</b>
Answer: Yes, there is. The Oldest Japanese community in the continental United States is in San Francisco. Outsiders call that place Japantown, and many insiders translate Japan as <i>Nihon</i> and town as <i>machi</i>. But those who really know what it’s about say <i>Nihonjin machi</i> which means Japanese people.
As Japantown is really an ethnic group and not merely a piece of real estate, when it began to falter financially and was in danger of dissolving, Mayor Newsom suggested that the area simply be zoned to exclude all non-Japanese.
<b>Question: As no mayor – liberal or otherwise – is probably going to seek zoning for Whites, and even most WN leaders aren’t making much of an effort at community building yet, how would PLEs survive without a similar level of cooperation or non-interference from the establishment?</b>
Answer: PLEs would serve as vessels of a cultural revival, releasing an “uncontrolled White Nationalist culture” in the target area for all outsiders to voluntarily and legally flee. <b>Question: Today’s political establishment leaves White people out in the rain, and PLEs are described as their “arks of survival,” but what does that actually mean?</b>
Answer: It’s another hint that our survival strategy (PLE) is a modern extension of our heritage. And whether WNs are motivated by the biblical story about Noah and his family surviving a great flood, or of a very similar Greek story about Deucalion enduring when Zeus flooded the earth, White people need an ark.
It’s time to gather every resource into the PLE target area that will enable us to survive. That includes our most conscious men, women, and families, everything they normally needed before, and as many cultural revival products as they can generate in order to reach other Whites.
<b>Question: As PLE is actually “PLE-Legionism,” do any of the previous methods of defence in Western Civilization bear any resemblence to this modern strategy?</b>
Answer: The Greeks often encouraged their opponents to battle them near their polis, as the support of its people and resources tended to tip the balance in their favor.
Unfortunately, all too many “modern Greek warriors” in White Nationalism registered their protests without bothering about community support (PLEs), believing that they could simply shock the Old White community into wakefulness. But the people these were willing even to die for didn’t have the kind of cultural preparation that would ever allow them to understand, so now those warriors sit in jail.
It is also worth mentioning, as PLEs are the vessels of a much needed cultural revival, that the Greco-Roman root of the word Legion means to gather.
An ancient relationship between those words allows us to place an emphasis on one or the other during PLE organizing, depending on whether it’s for militant or peaceful purposes.
An existing example of this in American culture is that any legal president of the United States is also the commander and chief of the armed forces. From the PLE perspective this is an acceptable extension of the legion idea into politics.
We recognize similar characteristics all across American culture; with a traditional American community gathering in all its Norman Rockwell familiarity being an acceptable form of “cultural legionism.” Many of our opponents understand this, and our people need to understand as well.
The opponents of Whites have frequently attempted to represent this peculiar arrangement as a form of fascism or national socialism, even making an issue of how similar symbols are utilized throughout US government, but “legionism” here has long been applied to very different circumstances and values.
<b>Question: Those militants you spoke of, who remain in jail because of a lack of community support, have political supporters who will also reject the military and cultural legion tradition of PLE organizing, but what would be the advantages in coming over to it?</b>
Answer: To begin with, whether a person is militant, political, or culture oriented, they are invited to come as they are into a PLE.
Within the PLE the more militant are openly and legally invited to support the local PLE veteran’s post, which is the only approved “militant” front.
If they reject that, and some will, they can still establish themselves elsewhere (within or outside the PLE), but the PLE’s residents may be more inclined to criticize them.
On the other hand, those who choose the legion tradition, which Whites created and reclaim in the PLE as an ethnic creation, can more credibly claim that they have the authority to do whatever they need to do.
<b>Question: Can you provide a few examples on how an entire community becomes a form of resistance?</b>
Answer: Beginning in the American Civil War, and much more routinely during World War 2, entire cities were destroyed when their civilians and resources were understood to be prolonging the war.
Then by the 1960s, when the strategies of the political/cultural/lifestyle community emerged during peacetime in the US, it was realized that even certain types of community cultures were capable of subtly overthrowing or repelling opponents.
And Black, homosexual, and Chinese communites continue to displace Old style White communities and expand in this manner. None are ever tripped up by civil rights legislation, even though they are obviously segregated, because their opponents simply don’t want to have anything to do with them.
This leaves White Nationalists with a decision to make: Shall they go on believing that someone or something is capable of stopping them from forming their own power centers (PLE commmunities), or will they see the opportunity to break out at last with this peculiar new strategy that promises so much.
<b>Question: One of the first and provisional symbols for PLE was a stock design from Stormfront that was first associated with the Royal House of Spain’s presidio system, and later the 6th US Army in California. What’s does it mean to PLE people?</b>
Answer: Spain’s first use of such militant communities, or presidios, began in Morocco in 1570. And there evolved various forms of them across Northern Mexico and California. The word presidio is derived from ancient Rome’s Latin word for a garrisoned place, praesidium. This is all largely symbolic in a PLE, as the only official militants are with the local veteran’s legion post.
<b>Question: You’re an early advocate of something called “White Rights,” as is David Duke, but in all seriousness don’t you think Whites already have their rights?</b>
Answer: You’re apparently referring to our “individual rights,” but what Whites urgently need the most is a restoration of their group or community rights.
Answer: For most of the history of Western Civilization there was an emphasis on group rights, then the emphasis on individual rights emerged in the early part of the sixteenth century. The individual rights revolution continued growing, and that was good, but by the 1950s it was ignorantly being extended to Blacks within our ethnic space.
That’s when the group or community rights of our people began collapsing. To grasp the significance of all this, imagine the reaction of the world if outsiders were to suddenly begin demanding “equal rights” within any Chinatown; including employment, joining social organizations, or purchasing real estate. That would more quickly be interpreted as a campaign of genocide.
Answer: When designing the Bill of Rights the founders drew most of their inspiration from the Roman Republic’s approximately five centuries (509 B.C. to 27 B.C. ), as they subscribed to what is called “classic republicanism,” a view holding a central principle about avoiding diversity.
That’s the observation that the more people have in common the better they will treat each other. The unwanted diversity could be classes, and certainly races if one accepts the evidence that the founding fathers owned slaves and clearly expressed that they were excluding native Indians in the Declaration of Independence. And until the American Civil war, even the supreme court routinely ruled that the documents of the founders were intended only for White people.
<b>Question: Michael Novak, a highly celebrated Christian philosopher who’s contributed to National Review, says in his book ‘On Two Wings’ that, despite the separation of church and state on the surface of what America’s founding fathers advocated, that one entire wing of their inspiration was Judeo-Christian.
Nowak not only begins his book with that emphasis, but says that we’re still using those Judeo-Christian metaphysics today. Is this going to change with the rise of the PLEs, where a reborn or new type of White community comes into being?</b>
Answer: To construct that two winged metaphysic Novak speaks of, the founding fathers drew from all across Western Civilization, and they saw those religious and non-religious values holding society together invisibly.
Additionally, what’s narrowly viewed as Judeo-Christian can actually be traced back to the community building contributions of the Egyptians, Babylonians, Sumerians, and Arabians, among others.
It’s very similar to the way Europeans only received the intellectual accomplishments of the Greeks after centuries of Arab custodianship, but we’re still a separate people from the Arabs or the Jews.
<b>Question: Why are PLE supporters (WNs, racially conscious Whites) asked to concentrate themselves within an area targeted for takeover within today’s obsolete type of White community?</b>
Contrary to what’s widely accepted, the existing type of “White community” is an obsolete cultural form, and we need to raise up the next one, which will be racially conscious. The time tested way to do this is much like igniting a starter bundle of sticks and paper in the fire-place.
This is why Irish Nationalists concentrated themselves in Dublin between the 1890s and 1922, and why German Nationalists concentrated themselves in Munich in the 1920s. In fact, the latter made it even more formal and desigated actual “block organizers” which were the most prolific leadership positon in the NSDAP.
<b>Question: Why do PLEs especially welcome in the “difficult and feral” WNs? And are there ideological sources for reading into this further?</b>
ANSWER: We do it because it’s a rule of nature that whether a man is without a proper cultural home (a community) or a housecat is without the shelter of a human’s home, each will revert to a feral, hard, and unpredictable condition.
Today’s White person is an increasingly isolated individual who no longer has the benefit of a real ethnic community that holds living space. If a large number of the people who suffer the most from this collapse are concentrated into a target area, all the outsiders will voluntarily flee.
This will suddenly open up the opportunity for the most perceptive among them to raise up a racially conscious community in the target area, and to guide it in such a way as to culturally terraform all the rest of the White community.
Some of the best material for exploring this theme has come from philosopher John Locke, who was a key source for the founding fathers. Locke said that in a state of nature the individual was threatened, vulnerable, and selfish.
<i>Other observers have added that an isolated person will often express themselves so egotistically that they become unbearable to be around. That includes even many White Nationalists in the political closet who identify with the obsolete type of White community and live without the conscious type of community, PLE, or Stormfront of the street.</i>
And the little books of the modern longshoreman-philosopher Eric Hoffer – especially the Ordeal of Change and the True Believer – are also useful. Hoffer viewed the nonconformists and misfits as the the mainspring of change. H. Michael Barrett References:
Adcock, F.E. ‘The Greek and Macedonian Art of War’ Berkeley, California: University of California Press 1957
Moorhead. Max ‘The Presidio – Bastion of the Spanish Borderlands’ Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press 1975
Veale, F. J. P. ‘Advance to Barbarism – The Development of Total Warfare.’ Newport Beach, California: Institute for Historical Review 1948-93
Buchanan, Patrick J. ‘The Death of the West – How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization’ New York, New York: St. Martin’s Press 2002
Uncredited Author ‘History of San Francisco Japantown – 1906 to 2006’ San Francisco, California: S. F. Examiner Newspaper May 19, 2006 pg. 29
Barnes, Harry Elmer ‘An Intellectual and Cultural History of the Western World’ (in Three Volumes) New York, New York: Dover Publications 65
Charles Quigley & Duane Smith (editorial directors and staff) ‘With Liberty And Justice for All – The Story of the Bill of Rights, Calabasas, Ca: Center for Civic Education 1993
Novak, Michael ‘On Two Wings – Humble Faith and Common Sense at the American Founding’ San Francisco, California: Encounter Books 2003
Hanson, Victor Davis ‘Carnage and Culture – Landmark Battles In The Rise of Western Power’ New York, New York: Random House 2001 <b>The Militant Populists As America’s Counterpart To NS & Fascism</b>
The following questions and answers are to assist all those who, in studying the proposal for Stormfronts of the Street (aka PLEs), are taking a particular interest in America’s counterpart to Italian Fascism and German National Socialism (aka “Legionism brought into politics”).
<b>Question: Can you tell us which Americans were the closest counterparts to the national socialist and fascist leaders who emerged in Italy, Germany, and elsewhere in the 1930s?</b>
Answer: Although we had our counterparts, and third way solutions were implemented on a large scale, the most “totalitarian” (defined as a world view embracing most issues) among them were not as successful as in Europe.
<b>Question: We’ve read of Father Charles Couglin, Henry Ford, Charles Lindbergh, General Douglas MacArthur, General George Van Horn Moseley, Huey Long, William Randolf Hearst, Fritz Kuhn, sometimes even Roosevelt and others. Are they the only people we need to know?</b>
Answer: The classic characteristics were dispersed more widely among our counterparts than in Europe, but there’s one especially significant story that was suppressed for a long time:
During the summer of 1932, which was at the height of the Depression, a totally unknown WW! veteran by the name of Walter W. Waters – wearing a paramilitary uniform, jackboots, and a bow tie – led 45,000 veterans into Washington D.C. This group was called the Bonus Expeditonary Force (or BEF), and Waters was eventually asked to lead it as their “Commander.”
<b>Question: Why did he and the other veterans come from all across America to make this march?</b>
Answer: The veterans of WW1 had been promised a cash bonus after the war, and when it didn’t materialize and their families were starving they began hopping aboard frieight trains from all across the country. Their goal was to reach Congress and encourage a special vote on the issue, personally making an appeal for it to be resolved in their favor. The idea for this came from Walter W. Waters. And he was advised and encouraged from Congress by the author of the bill, Wright Patman.
<b>Question: Did Waters come in peace or was he really interested in overthrowing the government?</b>
Answer: Waters had adopted the non-violent approach that had succeeded for Mohandas Gandhi in India, and because of this he also gained the participation of the retired General Butler, one of his primary speakers.
This was long before Martin Luther King’s supporters claimed to have adapted non-violent tactics for America. It should also be noted, however, as was the case with King’s movement, that Waters occasionally had to restrain supporters whose anger increased their tendency for violence.
<b>Question: Was Waters successful in restraining those violence prone supporters?</b>
Answer: Yes, much more so than King would be three decades later, but he sometimes took a calculated vacation from restraining anyone at all when his opponents took advantage of his patriotic preference for this nonviolent approach.
Answer: He didn’t have to, as the military was still racially segregated. And it should be noted, many of the veterans involved in the march were Black.
<b>Question: Did Waters or the BEF model this march after Hitler’s Beer Hall Putsch or Mussolini’s March On Rome?</b>
Answer: After arriving in Washington DC Waters said he was influenced by both of those movements, and although they were part of an international trend which many people accepted in hard times, some of the emphasis may have been for his opponents’ ears.
Using both foreign examples, rather then just one, was also logical because so many Americans are either German or Italian. And neither nation had yet been involved in any great controversy with the United States.
Commander Waters also guided the creation of a BEF newspaper, and then issued membership cards. Congressman Wright Patman received card number one.
<b>Question: Was fascism and national socialism the main inspiration? In other words, was the BEF an imported movement?</b>
Answer: No, the economic and social concerns of the BEF were completely domestic, and its organizing tradition was populism – America’s own counterpart to the third way movements in Europe.
Answer: An almost identical march had occurred in 1894, when a populist by the name of Jacob S. Coxey led thousands of war veterans onto borrowed freight cars and demonstrated in Washington DC. To some degree Waters was also influenced by the flamboyant style of William Dudley Pelley.
<b>Question: How do we know that the news of this movement, one which almost got out of hand and overthrew the United States government, was actually suppressed by the media?</b>
Answer: There’s a recent book on this event: Paul Dickson & Thomas B Allen’s ‘The Bonus Army – An American Epic.’ N.Y., N.Y: Walker & Company. And it discloses how information on this event was either suppressed outright or negatively interpreted in the media.
But as the American people were enduring the same suffering as the veterans, they still tended to see through the charade. Even to this day there is a shortage of material on the Bonus March available to the public, though it was filmed, recorded, and monitored by reporters on a daily basis.
And because of William Dudley Pelley’s much more anti-Semitic political message, even a recent book critical of him was reduced to using a fuzzy picture on its cover due to the lack of photographs which survive today.
Pelley later became one of the primary targets of harassment during the Roosevelt admistration, and eventually he was convicted of treason and jailed. In fact, considering his importance in the 1930s, very little public information survives to this day.
<b>Question: When Congress voted against paying the bonus the veterans were still camped nearby, and their mood turned ugly. How close do you think they came to actually overthrowing the government?</b>
Answer: Many believe that that almost happened when the assistant police chief of Washington DC raised a drawbridge to divide the BEF’s supporters, preventing them from surrounding Congress during the voting.
But Commander Walters remained loyal to the government and restrained their reaction. Others suspect that such a revolution would only have occurred if America’s angry and starving farmers had been signalled to swell the ranks of the veterans already there.
General MacArthur (along with his aides Patton and Eisenhower) observed all of this as well, and even though he was eventually ordered by President Hoover to use the regular army to drive the bonus marchers out of Washington, when this was all over he made it a point to hire the enterprising “Commander” Walters for his own office!
These questions and answers began in search of America’s counterpart to Europe’s fascist and national socialist leadership, and so it was during this event in our history, when Waters, Butler, MacArthur, Patton, Eisenhower, and Moseley are interacting that most of its most significant miltary personalities are found.
Answer: The bonus march occurred at a time when Franklin Roosevelt had presidential aspirations, and when he saw how badly it was handled by President Hoover he said he knew instantly that he was ideally positoned to win office and become the person to implement his own third way solutions without violence.
<b>Question: After this particular march Franklin Roosevelt got into office, but the bonus marchers returned again later with a smaller group of representatives. Did Roosevelt give them what they wanted or did he clash with them as well?</b>
Answer: Neither of those things happened. Roosevelt had his wife bring the veterans coffee and an invitation to the White House. Then when they came he asked them to consider participating in the recovery programs that he had in mind instead. This is what the veterans and the nation eventually did accept, and the New deal was popular, but it actually took a world war to fully and artificially stimulate the economy. In 1944 Congress also passed the GI bill, and the bonus marchers are widely credited with providing its original impetus.
<b>Question: Considering Roosevelt’s foreign policies and WW2, I’m sure that not too many people today would view him as being any sort of national socialist or fascist, even though society and the military was racially segregated at the time, but that’s pretty much what this adds up to.</b>
Answer: Yes, it’s one of history’s great ironies, but it becomes easier to accept when one considers how Mussolini himself had once come close to going to war with Hitler. And having Roosevelt in office here was no more unlikely than if the left-leaning Gregor Strasser had somehow managed to assume power in Germany instead of Hitler.
<b>Question: Why is it necessary for White Nationalists to understand their own “national socialist and fascist counterpart” tradition? </b>
Answer: It’s necessary because what many White Nationalists did was to throw the baby out with the bathwater when they rejected everything associated with Roosevelt, a man who borrowed from many others.
It’s not surprising that many did, however, when one considers how Roosevelt’s Jewish advisors were especially close to him and how he was determined to join the fight for democratic principles, but wherever WNs abandoned America’s own “national socialism” (Roosevelt’s social programs) and America’s militant traditions (legionism in politics) they have been reduced to taking up cultish alternatives unassociated with their roots.
<b>Question: When Roosevelt managed to take the helm of the ship of state, was that the end of this “legionism brought into politics?”</b>
Answer: No it wasn’t. For Roosevelt to implement the New Deal, to bring us into WW2, and to serve more terms in office than anyone else before or since, he had to at least temporarily be endowed with special powers – as was certainly going on in Europe in a much more obvious way.
Veteran political observers here immediately recognized the correlation, but as the “commander and chief” didn’t put a uniform on during any of the crisies, few among the general public ever associated him with the powers of dictatorship.
Some of Roosevelt’s opponents agressively protested his actions, but as they were a minority he yielded to temptation and suspended their civil rights.
I think it’s important, however, to mention that in the United States this “legionism brought into politics” phenomena – which also happened during the American Civil War on both sides – has proven to wax and wane as “needed.” And it’s always debatable to say exactly when it’s ever appropriate.
<b>Question: In your own estimate, then, when exactly would it be appropriate for the organizers of Stormfronts of the Street’ (aka PLEs) to take it up?</b>
For now our activists should be raising up a first conscious community, because that’s where power comes from, but they should also project the take over of a first local veterans post during the process.
As the competitors and opponents of Whites eat up portions of the Old White community, you’re also going to notice them accomplishing the same goals.
<b>Question: Is there evidence that this subject is still being distorted today?</b>
Answer: The cover of the book by Dickson and Allen, which is usually the publisher’s doing and not an author’s, has a photograph of some veterans posing while standing in front of one of the trains they’ve “borrowed” to cross the country.
The men are seen giving a clenched fist salute, as they were part of the minority which participated separately. Sometimes communists were tolerated by people familiar with the strike tactic of letting them do any dirty work, but any units guarding the veterans’ camps routinely chased them out.
<b>Question: You’ve gone to considerable effort to explain all this, but why should WNs examine this “legionism temporarily brought into politics” which occasionally happens in the United States?</b> i Answer: Our opponents have successfully derailed the efforts of White Nationalists today, as many have resorted to imported political traditions which are easily challenged or confounded. <a href=”http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t313631/” target=”_blank”>My Favorite Pro-White Cults</a> The reclaiming of our native populism, however, offers us the most effective way to break free.
Answer: In the early 1970s I was employed as a desk clerk at Congressman Wright Patman’s place of residence, Columbia Plaza Apartments in Washington DC, and there I regulary handed him his mail each evening. On one occasion someone passing by noticed him and made the remark “Oh, there’s Patman. Is he still trying to overthrow the government?”
<b>Question: This was during the 1970s, the same period when the late Dr. William Pierce had launched his newspaper ‘Action.’ As you were the first person who was ever involved in a physical clash with opponents on behalf of the NA, and that incident also involved a Capitol hill politician, tell us what happened.</b>
Answer: My original intention was to just observe a demonstration by the Vietnam Veterans Against the War. They were heavily influenced by Marxist militants, and I encountered their march going up along one of the sides of the Capitol.
Then quite unexpectedly, Representative Sonny Montgomery of Mississippi (the man who increased the benefits of the original GI bill) began teasing the demonstrators with a South Vietnamese flag, and a lot of shouting began.
Again, I got even closer, but it was just to observe what was transpiring. Then suddenly one of the militants decided to try punch Representative Montgomery full force in the face.
The attacker, in full view of the police and media, got as far as completely cocking his arm for his punch. At this moment Montgomery was looking away, and the unfairness of it just prompted me to instinctively intervene.
Somehow I managed to punch the attacker full force in the jaw before he reached Montgomery.
I had never hit anyone in my life as hard as I hit this veteran, and so he keeled over in a very theatrical way, not even getting a chance to bend his legs as he fell like a tree toward his friends.
Then I tried to get out of there, as there were many more of them than of us, and so I jogged across the street.
A group of DC police who had not seen any of this, but whom I collided with at this point, then decided to arrest me; so they clicked handcuffs onto my wrists and read me my rights.
Then their supervisor came over, and he had actually seen the incident. Despite that, he began examining my political affilations. When he saw the National Alliance membership card next to my identification though, and was simply assured that I wasn’t associated with Communism, he asked his men if they could get over the fact that I had accidentally bowled a few of them over while, quite logically, trying to get away.
One officer actually did have an abrasion on his hand, but when the supervisor jokingly assessed it as a petty complaint, they all agreed that the handcuffs should come off and that I be secretly sent on my way.
I had only walked about a half a block when suddenly I experienced a partial blackout, and my hand became increasingly numb. This was because my adrenalin level was normalizing, so I went to a telephone and let the NA’s employees know that I was actually injured.
Dr. Pierce then drove into DC by himself, and brought me over to a hospital. A doctor there set a bone broken in the lowest part of my hand, though there was little he could do for the lowest knuckle, and he applied a cast and sling.
There was also a bizarre moment when, after I admitted that my injuries were related to the protests, that the young doctor suddenly gave me some sort of left wing salute and a hug of appreciation.
When Dr. Pierce and I returned to the NA office, he took a photo of my cast and sling and wrote the first street battle report that the NA was to publish.
A few years later, when the first edition of the Turner Diaries was published with cartoons of the characters by Dennis Nix, I was surprised to see that one of the characters had a similar pose; but the very real cast was remade into a fictional bomb.
<b>Question: Where coud we find a lot more reading on the subjects you’ve brought up herel?</b>
Answer: Yes, Stormfront’s Advance Scout forum is solely devoted to explaining the modern update, something provisionally called PLE-Legionism (as in Pioneer Little Europe and veteran legionism).
by H. Michael Barrett, author of the PLE Prospectus.
<b>Duke, David ‘My Awakening – A Path To Racial Understanding’ Covington, LA Free Speech Press 1998</b> David Duke campaigned with the slogan “Equal Rights For All — Special Privileges For None.” It’s a populist slogan more than a century old. And as no one has ever gotten as far as Duke in both explaining and representing the interests of the White race in modern America, buy this book for sure. Also read the chapter titled “Belly of the Beast,” as he’s generously mentioned me, PLE’s author.
<b>Kazin, Michael ‘The Populist Persuasion – An American History Ithaca, New York: Basic Books/Harper Collins 1995</b> This is quite an extensive survey of populist movements and personalities. And unlike many other authors, Kazin includes Charles Coughlin, George Wallace, David Duke and many others who have projected racial views within populism.
<b>Dighe, Ranjit S. ‘The Historian’s Wizard of Oz – Reading L. Frank Baum’s Classic as a Political and Monetary Allegory’ Westport, Connecticut: Praeger 2002</b> Many people believe that Frank Baum filled his classic book with secret symbolisms about populism. And although most authorities appear to discount the theory, an increasing number of economics teachers are employing the Wizard of Oz anyway as a colorful introduction to populism. Ranjit’s book explains how this is done.
<b>Lindbergh, Charles ‘Autobiography of Values’ New York, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovisch Publishers 1976-92</b> There are many Lindbergh books but this one will dispel the myth that he was a “Nazi.”
<b>Payne, Stanley G. ‘A History of Fascism 1914-1945’ </b>Madison, Wisconsin The Univ. of Wisconsin Press 1995 An encyclopedic survey of fascist movements which didn’t neglect Roosevelt’s connection to Mussolini.
<b>Beschloss, Michael R. ‘Kennedy & Roosevelt – The Uneasy Alliance’ </b>New York, New York: W. W. Norton and Company 1980 This is the best book I ever encountered for understanding how Roosevelt changed in office.
<b>Dickson, Paul & Allen, Thomas B. ‘The Bonus Army – An American Epic’ </b>New York, New York: Walker & Company 2006[/b] An unknown WW1 veteran emerges to lead a march on Washington
<b>Beekman, Scott ‘William Dudley Pelley – A Life In Right Wing Extremism And The Occult’ Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press 2005 </b>This is a critical biography, but it is the only one which was published even decades after Pelley passed away.
<b>Bellamy, Edward ‘Looking Backward’ New York, New York: Dover Publications 1888-1996</b> This highly acclaimed and quite readable science fiction novel from 1888 is a pitch for the political third way of populism.
Bellamy’s writings were among William Dudley Pelley’s main inspirations, but even in Pelley’s time it took a bit of faith to believe that the predictions about credit cards, a large volunteer culture, and piped in music would eventually happen.
<b>Bendersky, Joseph W. ‘The Jewish Threat – Anti-Semitic Politics of the US Army'</b> New York, New York: Basic Books 2000 The US Army had a lot more in common with N. S. Germany than many would ever dream possible.
<b>Black, Edwin ‘War Against the Weak – Eugenics & America’s Campaign To Create A Master Race’ </b>New York, New York: Four Walls Eight Window 2003 There have been some very large but crude attempts to improve the race in our country, as once went on in National Socialst Germany as well, but far less controversial methods have emerged since.
<b>Goodwyn, Lawrence ‘The Populist Moment – A Short History of the Agrarian Revolt in America'</b> N. Y, New York: Oxford University Press 1978 The third way between Capitalism and Communism, and it preceded both fascism and national socialism.
<b>Schwantes, Carlos A. ‘Coxey’s Army – An American Odyssey’ Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press 1985 </b>This is the story of the military veterans who marched to Washington DC in 1894 in order to demand that the government stimulate a badly faltering economy by getting more silver into circulation and by launching public works programs for the unemployed. They were right, of course, but the weathy did not submit to these “radical” remedies until the Roosevelt years.
<b>Rockwell, George Lincoln ‘White Power’ </b>Arlington, Virginia: National Socialist White People’s Party 1967-77 Rockwell was assassinated while leading his supporters out of the style but not the substance of NS cultism, but he was also the populist genius who coined the slogan ‘White Power.’
<b>Rockwell, George Lincoln ‘This Time The World’ </b>Liverpool, West Virginia White Power Publications 1963-79 Rockwell accomplished a lot in his lifetime, as a commercial artist, naval commander, publisher, author, and nationally known speaker, but he also candidly recounts a lifetime struggle with alcoholism, the alienation of his two families, and less consciously his final descent into the NS cultism which left him isolated from even his White neighbors across the street.
Effective political communities tend to resemble basic life forms; in other words, the great bulk of the creature is rather uncomplicated but provides the power needed for the smaller but more conscious part to get anywhere. Little Europe’s base of supporters will include contrasting types: Some will be too idealistic, some too uncommitted, and some too militant. There will also be many who are less than perfect spiritually or physically, but all will thrive on the empowerment they sense as the roaring engine of their people’s elite.
Little Europe’s political organizations need to reach veterans as well, as they are an especially important category, so the best example to emulate is the British National Party’s Association of British Ex-Servicemen (ABEX). The ABEX has a campaign to advance the rights of veterans and maintain local war memorials. And they have been invited right into the British Legion Club, where they open up discussions on Zionism and revisionist history.
In the United States, however, racialist organizations have been too isolated from most Whites to reach veterans effectively, and they have long tended to be bogged down by cultism, which is an inability to refocus from the ideologies of past racialist ideologies or update their strategies. As many realize by this juncture, the first obstruction is easily corrected by moving the political battle over to our own higher ground (Little Europe), and the second of these minor adjustments is ideological:
Assimilated White people are those who are adapted to the circumstances unique to this nation’s character; they do not clash with our nativist military traditions and possess a sense for discerning when they have heard them defined correctly.
Like our brothers, sisters, and many unknown cousins in Europe, we proudly trace our particular branch of Western civilization to, among other places, ancient Greece and Rome. Even a glance at the buildings housing our government reveals that those influences are expressed in our art and architecture.
If you examine the road of history spanning the past two thousand years you will also recognize the dominant position which Rome maintained. In comparison no other Western culture held such physical space with longevity.
And it was not bestowed on them by some generous quirk of nature. No, it was necessary that the Romans discover a more sophisticated method of survival, something more determined than any force that threatened to plunder their inheritance, and their legions marched.
Those earlier legions were successful for a very long time, as they were involved in a process of conquering and recruiting that expanded their boundaries, but eventually they surrendered their ethnic integrity and collapsed from within. A similar insight also explains why today’s White soldiers, who continue their service as veteran legionaries, are part of a gathering social crisis.
Following the American Civil War – or War Between the States, as Southern nationalists describe it – America’s veterans could join such organizations as the Grand Army of the Republic or the United Soldiers of the Confederacy, and following the war with Spain they could join the Spanish American War veterans organization.
And although the forming and reforming of many organizations has generally served veterans well, it should also be noted that whenever they came into being after conflicts between White nations or states they also brought the veterans fraternal tradition one more step toward splintering, dysfunction, and obsolescence.
Today in America most White people only accept the American Legion, Forty & Eight, and the Veterans of Foreign Wars as the militant aspect within our national culture. The combined influences of those organizations is our native counterpart to any European nation’s veteran tradition, but to explain the hidden crisis growing within our own let’s examine the splintering process.
The American Legion, for example, was founded in 1919 in Paris at the conclusion of World War 1, by men and women aware of their European heritage, interests and identity as Americans, and eventually it became the most powerful ex-serviceman’s organizations.
This particular legion has thousands of long established posts that serve nearly every town in America. And its meeting halls often provide the most high profile forum for civilians who organize cultural gatherings opened by expressions of their own patriotism.
Throughout the 1920s and 1930s gangsters, communists, and anarchists often terrorized towns where they knew police power was inadequate, but they were regularly routed by this people’s militia which often came out – if the danger was great enough to justify it – wielding an improvised yet effective defense.
Yet the greatest challenge to the Legion’s role emerged from within, and the Whites building Little Europes should acquire a basic grasp of the causes before they begin.
The first major crisis arrived just before World War 2, when the sympathy of many veterans for this or that European nation because of their roots or political outlook caused them to break with the parent organizations and form alternative legions (unsuccessfully).
At first there was no substantial controversy, and it was possible for the American Legion’s own National Vice Commander William Edward Eastman Jr., to extend honorary membership in 1931 to one Benito Mussolini.
Congressman Hamilton Fish, responsible for writing the Legion’s preamble at its founding, often addressed antiwar rallies with the German American Bund, Father Charles Coughlin, and the Christian Mobilizers. And the opponents of these leaders and organizations sometimes succeeded in convincing the public that even such mainstream opponents of war were Nazis.
American First included three prominent retired generals (Hugh Johnson, Thomas S. Hammond, and Robert E. Wood), loyal Americans who represented a tradition that our people still prefer to fascism. And Senator Bennett Champ Clark of Missouri and Congressman James E. Zandt of Pennsylvania, as legionnaires, assisted Colonel Charles Lindbergh’s campaign for preventing U.S. entry into war.
They all believed quite rationally that peaceful relations between our European peoples (and the nation was mostly white at that time) was an honorable goal. And even when William Dudley Pelley founded an alternative, and perhaps more radical legion, he still carefully named it the Silvershirt Legion of America. Among Pulley’s earliest organizers was Gerald L. K. Smith, former right-hand man to Louisiana Governor Huey Long.
Prior to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the isolationists peace movement sponsored by these and many other respected personalities and organizations successfully held the majority of American citizens back from entering the European conflict, as it was essentially a civil war among Whites.
The controversy was centered in Washington, DC where both sides were well entrenched and fighting it out – politically – tooth and nail. On February 8, 1940, the Hon. J. Thorkelson, a Norwegian-American representing the state of Montana, stood up near his desk in the House of Representatives to address the American people.
Mr. Thorkelson:” Mr. Speaker, in order that we many understand that warfare in England is not unanimous I shall quote from the December 1939 issue of Action (The prewar publication from the organization lead by Mosley and other British war veterans). This is generally known, but in no sense does information of this sort appear in our own papers.”
And Mr. Thorkelson went on to read a few thousand words regarding the Second World War into the Congressional Record. The Record is a compilation of the issues discussed each day by the US Government, a publication made available to every interested person.
Although the future looked bright for the peace movement, President Roosevelt – who had promised that “no American boy will ever fight Europe’s wars” – was determined to draw Americans into opposing the Axis (German, Italy, Japan, and other countries). And by 1941, Edward E. Spafford, a highly respected former National Commander, was arrested on charges of having conspired with Nazi agents.
Recognizing that many people were rightly unsympathetic about Japan’s atrocities in China, if even openly racist about Japanese, that nation’s oil supply lifeline was soon cut off. And just as General William Mitchell had warned as early as 1925, during his trial for criticizing the traitorous neglect of aviation, the Japanese delivered a surprise daylight attack from the air upon Pearl Harbor.
Overnight American public opinion turned against any legionnaires still in support of an axis counterpart; so few continued into the uproar as William Pelley’s Silvershirts did. Most were as perceptive as Charles Lindbergh and abandoned the campaign immediately, accepting the position of ‘My country right or wrong. ‘
Some unassimilated Americans, however, just couldn’t see any important difference between a foreign and domestic veterans legion traditions, and being too far apart from other whites ideologically they were rounded up after Pearl Harbor. In a few cases the authorities did succeed in arresting those who might have obstructed the war effort, but most were innocently swept up in an event similar to the McCarthyism of the next era; a politically biased climate that fed on the public’s paranoia about alien militants.
Lindbergh actually preferred the Legion tradition, and wasn’t enamored by those who organized alternatives such as Pelley and Mosley, but Marxist critics and some not so perceptive cultists still promote the error that Lindbergh and his legion supporters were Nazis. And they fail to grasp that those millions of supporters in the mainstream were certainly not Nazis or Fascists either.
Extremists attempt to blur any distinction between those who lead European fascist parties and our own legionaries, but it’s in the interest of our Little Europes to 1) highlight the controversy 2) support the millions of Whites still willing to argue that there is a difference 3) remain faithful to the legion tradition 4) translate any postwar ideas from Europe with that perspective.
The second major crisis for America’s legion tradition occurred in 1959. And this was to be almost the deathblow to the Legion and other victor-veterans groups as organizations vital enough to prevent America’s gradual drift to chaos.
Blacks in North America had acquired only a partial awareness of political self-determination because they advanced, not alongside as with blacks in South Africa, but up into the very fabric of white society.
Bolstered by opportunist political and legal support from Washington, DC, those who demanded a subverted definition of American Legionism, that is minus any concern for ethnic cultural integrity, declared the whites-only restriction illegal. This was now forbidden, and those who advocated it were relegated to the political hinterland.
Pandemonium spread to Legion posts across the country as thousands of racially loyal dissenters attempted to oppose the coup d’etat by throwing their support to one of the Legion’s founding factions, The Forty and Eight (Their proper name is actually La Societe des Quarante Hommes at Huit Chevaux). The next assault came in court, and soon this especially authoritative organization for White veterans lost even the right to use the official emblem.
America’s veterans legions, as they functioned prior to the political and cultural dispossession of the White community, contributed to a White nativist identity which cleaved separate foreign nationalist traditions.
Their meeting halls became the places where veterans of English and Irish origin could join fairly with the French, Germans, Italians, Russians, and all the rest of our people; however, when those posts were captured by those who advocated no special loyalty to the cultural institutions of Whites (and no respect for the living space they need to be in), the inherited method for gathering veterans of separate nationalist politics often went unappreciated.
Answer: A PLEs “umbrella” militant tradition is the Legionism of its local military veteran’s post.
What makes these posts quite different, however, is that within a PLE everyone in the post is a White Nationalist. In the beginning the membership will have to be mostly invisible.
How much to bring the Legion tradition into political activity (such as it was in previous social crises, whether in principle by Long and Roosevelt or within the visual trappings of the Bund), and whether that profile is temporary or permanent, high or low profile, or abandoned altogether, is left to the PLE’s competing purists to decide.
Additionally, proWhite activists of various organizations are actually permitted to bring into the broader PLE target area any of the militant, radical, peace making, or negotiating traditions or tactics they prefer instead. PLEs are open pro-White communities.
Those who have no military experience are encouraged to support this military veterans tradition by participating in a PLE’s cultural activities (“cultural-legionism” is the PLE term for that). <b>Question: Why is it necessary to promote this perspective of military veteran and “cultural Legionism” among White Nationalists, as it’s a slightly more ideological approach than we’re used to?</b>
Answer: Much as Whites forgot the importance of retaining the integrity of their ethnic living space, often compromising them with nonWhite labor, now PLE communities are required in order to reestablish them.
The OLD White community also compromised the integrity of its ethnic defense tradition, when outsiders were permitted into its military veterans posts.
Legionism is the only tradition that can win in this country during a crisis, if organized properly, because it is our native counterpart to the militant traditions in Europe which were also brought into politics; including fascism and national socialism before WW2 and wider european nationalisms after the war.
<b>Question: The PLE people coin the term “Legionism” to describe this nation’s patriotic tradition. They apply it to the armed forces, veterans organizations even outside the American Legion, and advocate that it serve as the common militant front for all WNs <i>within the target area of these local PLEs.</i> But as there will still probably be WNs in the target area who will ignore this recommended guideline and advocate importing some form of fascism or even Germany’s National Socialism, perhaps even advocating that we WNs shun or overthrow the Legion traditon, what do you have to say to them?</b>
The cultists should re-read the speech Hitler delivered to the court after the Beer Hall Putsch, as he reassured the public that he wasn’t going to theaten the Reichswehr, Germany’s armed forces. And that’s despite its past assocation with the Wiemar Republic. Then later, when his chief of the SA, Ernst Roehm, actually became a threat to the Reichswehr, Hitler opposed this secord revolution in the Night of the Long Knifes.
<b>Question: If a PLE is raised up in an ideal area, but there’s actually no veterans post, what should we do about it?</b>
Answer: Just as a PLE exists wherever two or more people are gathered in this noble race’s name, a legion post exists wherever two or more veterans can credibly declare it so.
When there are enough veterans in your post, it can become official with the national organization. If that is denied, just operate in the most moral manner possible with the ritualistic trappings of legionism.
<b>Question: Is there any example from the history of the White race where something as daring as this succeeded?</b>
Answer: Yes, the Mormons of Nauvoo, Illlinois once absorbed all the trappings of their local Freemasons organzation. And they are still using much of that on a worldwide basis.
Anyone asking about it is told that “Masonry was once part of Christianity, but the Masons allowed the true faith to wither away.” The Mormons view their restoration as moral, though today no member of Utah’s Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is allowed to join the Masons.
Question: <b>Many of us accept that such leaders as Lincoln, Davis, F. D Roosevelt, and Long did indeed bring a certain militancy into their politics, which the PLE supporters alone dub as “legionism brought into politics,” but did this tendency or tradition emerge anytime after WW2?</b>
Yes, in Athens, Tennessee on August 1 & 2, 1946 veterans of the armed forces actually overthrew the local government (we don’t endorse that), which was widely known to be corrupt. And the reformers who took power received the support of allies as varied as gun rights advocates, libertarians, and even Eleanor Roosevelt. Al Gore’s father, in fact, was among the reformers elected after that local revolution.
<b>Question: As Roosevelt, Coughlin, Townsend, Long, Kennedy, Lindbergh, and even Pelley utilized this native base for their political activity (or what PLE activists formally define as “cultural legionism”) and not fascism or national socialism, doesn’t that suggest that an enormous variety of political beliefs is possible within this tradition; thus offering a political disadvantage?</b>
Answer: It’s actually social conditions which invite the application of the most appropriate remedies: This is why it’s not a coincidence that Coughlin and Long were former Roosevelt organizers; why Townsend’s social security ideas were absorbed by Roosevelt; why Joseph Kennedy remained with FDR for so long, and why Lindbergh agreed with Roosevelt about opposing the Japanese. <b>Question: Why was Roosevelt often denounced as a fascist by his critics?</b> <a href=”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Franklin_D._Roosevelt” rel=”nofollow” target=”_blank”>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Franklin_D._Roosevelt</a>
Answer: Primarily that came from conservatives who rejected Roosevelt’s big government programs, including social security. Roosevelt’s economics had an obvious similarity to Mussolini’s and Hitler’s, especially the make-work programs, and Roosevelt’s prewar guest and penpal Sir Oswald Mosley derived most of his own economics from them.
<b>Question: Mosley’s Blackshirts were rounded up when Britain went to war, but his autobiography says he desired to implement a very similar economic plan to Roosevelt’s. Wasn’t all that just a bit of day dreaming?</b>
Answer: Prior to Mosley’s fascist and national socialist activities he was a member of parliament. And although the government asked him to design a plan to rescue Britain from the Great Depression, they were so overwhelmed by its dimensions that they decided not to implement it. <b>Question: Do you think some other “Legionist” leader in America would have done this if Roosevelt hadn’t?</b>
Answer: The most capable, in the vew of many, probably would have been Louisiana’s Govenor Huey Long, but his assassination really left Roosevelt with much less competition to worry about.
</div> Coughlin was restained by the Catholic Church, Townsend placed most of his emphasis on social security, Joseph Kennedy lacked as large a base, and Lindbergh usually voted Republican which emphasized less government.
<b>Question: Hitler’s economic solutions were implemented after that country was disrupted by militant clashes in the streets, with National Socialism being essentially a synthesis derived from the two views in conflict, but wasn’t Roosevelt’s New Deal decided in a more generous and democratic way?</b>
Answer: Not really. Middle America had actually known ever since the Civil War that the rich needed to be reigned in, and even identified the economic remedies as far back as the 1890s when Coxley’s Army marched on Washington. But it was only after the veterans of WW1 held their own “Bonus March” – and soon threatened to overthrow the US government – that the leading Capitalists relented to a “New Deal” and the redistribution of wealth.
<b>Question: Was the New Deal a completely different solution than Mussolini’s fascism?</b>
There were enormous similarities: As it was widely known that fascist Italy’s various corporations for regulating what went on between workers and employers in various professions actually saved the day for the free enterprise system, Roosevelt’s people set up something quite similar. This was called the National Recovery Act. In fact, Hugh Johnson, the head of this NRA, is known to have personally delivered a copy of the pro-fascist book ‘The Corporate State’ by Raffaello Viglione to Secretary of Labor Francis Perkins as a guide to what he had in mind.
<b>Question: When the subject of fascism or national socialism comes up, I visulize neo-classical buildings, big government economic programs, state funded art, labor camps, concentration camps, leaders in open cars wearing capes, racial values, and militant rallies, but what has any of that got to do with Legionism?</b>
Answer: All of that existed to some degree in the Roosevelt administration, and a president is the commander of our armed forces, but it was also inspired by the cultural tempo of those times. And while we know how all that eventually became what we contend with today, we really don’t know how the fascist or national socialists would have endured victory any better.
<a href=”http://rexcurry.net/bookpic-nazi-salute-fdr.JPG” rel=”nofollow” target=”_blank”>http://rexcurry.net/bookpic-nazi-salute-fdr.JPG</a>
Even the otherwise liberal Mrs. Roosevelt, while visiting US troops in the Pacific, was willing in those times to carry home the message that “The officers are asking for more White women to come over and raise troop morale.”
<b>Question: Can you describe the kind of rally that the nativists held (which the PLE types define as Legionism today)?</b>
Answer: Following the Pearl Harbor attack, film star Jennette MacDonald led a USO show at the War Memorial Opera House (a neo-classical gem) in San Francisco.
<a href=”http://www.sfmuseum.org/hist8/jenmac.html” rel=”nofollow” target=”_blank”>http://www.sfmuseum.org/hist8/jenmac.html</a>
This particular performance reached an emotionally stirring height when she sang the ‘Battle Hymm of the Republic,’ because moments before launching into it she asked the thousands of uniformed service personnel there to rise to their feet. The effect of the song on all those present greatly resembled the total war speech that was given later in Germany by Dr. Joseph Goebbels.
<a href=”http://home.arcor.de/kriegsgefangene/usa/goebbels.html” rel=”nofollow” target=”_blank”>http://home.arcor.de/kriegsgefangene/usa/goebbels.html</a>
To see how the Iron Butterfly (Ms. MacDonald’s nickname) operated, rent a copy of the classic film ‘San Francisco,’ as it has her doing this particular number, and rolling her eyes in an endearing but certainly fanatical manner.
<b>Question: Do you think it’s true that Roosevelt was totally controlled by the Jews?</b>
Answer: That view is often emphasized by those who disagreed with his foreign policy, but although he certainly did rely on a large number of Jews, many Jews also criticize him for ignoring their pleas to increase their immigration from NS Germany.
This was the case even after he was advised of an alleged final solution (‘While Six Million Died’ by Arthur D. Morse, published in 1968 by the Overlook Press of Woodstock, New York). Roosevelt could indeed be resistant to his Jewish advisors, and he used the old quota system right up until the end of his life.
Additionally, it should be noted, FDR wasn’t willing to support the idea of planting the Jews in Palestine (Though his wife gave in to this after the war), as he strongly believed that the flood of immigrants would result in enormous political trouble and bloodshed.
<b>Question: Is it true that Hitler’s government was always opposed to what Jews wanted?</b>
Answer: More recent research has uncovered that there was a close working relationship between NS Germany and the Zionists in Palestine shortly after Hitler came to power, that it continued with Zionists in the concentration camps, and Himmler was still negotiating with the Zionists overseas into the last week of his life
It is also known that Himmler was handed over to a special Zionist unit attached to the British Army. And that he died during one of their “interrogations,” after having both refused to put on a British uniform or go naked and perform like a circus animal. His body was then buried in a hidden place without an autopsy.
After the war and the creation of Israel, Zionist leaders were greatly relieved when they were able to kidnap Eichmann and have him executed. As Israel continues to draw funds from Germany after the war, Eichmann’s death meant one less witness to the old relationship.
The complete details of this Zionist cooperation with NS Germany, which is one of the key reasons Israel was able to be created after the war in 1948, is available in these books:
* ‘The Transfer Agreement’ by Edwin Black: published in 2001 by Carroll & Graf of New York.
* ‘Zionism in the Age of the Dictators’ by Lenni Brenner: published by Lawrence Hill Co. of Westoport, Conn. 1983
* 51 Documents – Zionist Collaboration With the Nazis, edited by Lenni Brenner: published by Barricade Books of Fort Lee, New Jersey 2002
* Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers by Bryan Mark Rigg – The Untold Story of Nazi Racial Laws and Men of Jewish Decent in the German Military published by the University of Kansas in 2002
<b>Question: Roosevelt and his people were allied with Stalin, so wouldn’t that demonstate that there’s nothing to be learned from them?</b>
Roosevelt was indeed allied to Stalin, and that was right up until his death. Truman carried on that relationship for awhile as well, but eventually the spell was broken and Truman more realistically ordered the screening of all State Department employees.
Then that resistance to the Marxists erupted into the anti-communist campaign of Truman’s fellow democrat McCarthy. The roller coaster ride was very much like what the leaders of National Socialist Germany had once experienced. Stalinist Russia had been its valued partner for both trade and military training, but they caught on to the dangers of all that much sooner
<b>Question: During WW2 the American armed forces availed itself of Blacks who provided support from their own units, many as truck drivers. Isn’t this evidence enough that the US govenment was way behind Germany on race?</b>
Answer: By the war’s end it was also commonplace to encounter thousands of very dark skinned SS personnel from such exotic places as India (whom the British called Blacks), Orientals from east of Russia, Arabs, and many others.
Reference: Ailsby, Christopher ‘Hitler’s Renegades – Foreign Nationals In the Service of the Third Reich’ Dulles, Virginia: Brassey’s Inc. 2004
<b>Question: How should we feel about Roosevelt’s appointing of Justice Hugo Black, the ex-Klansman? Wasn’t that an obvious betrayal of our race?</b>
Answer: When asked to comment on the Nurenberg Trials, Justice Black defined it as a lynching. And while it’s true he participated in the dismantaling the old segregation system in his native South, it was actually obsolete anyway.
<b>Question: Why?</b>
Answer: Many of us still feel emotionally torn, crushed, and even white hot angry when we see the old news clips on the forced end to Southern segregation, as the basic intention was honorable, but as many Irish say today, we can’t get to the future through the past.
The old segregation system, with its customs about drinking fountains, resturants, and public transportation, served an economic system that kept the races in close proximity for the purpose of labor. The constant “lightening up” of Blacks eventually resulted in a rebellious leadership, and without Black cooperation there is no way the old system could continue.
Today’s “free floating relationship” for the races, ironically, sometimes increases the social distance of our communities in the places where our ethnic institutions aren’t invaded, but we need to formalize that integrity.
FDR nominated Justice Black to the Supreme Court in 1937, and that was typical of Roosevelt’s maintenance of his strong base of support in the South, where he also preferred to go on many vacations. And later this nomination permitted Justice Black – a Southerner widely known and accepted in Washington DC as a former klan organizer – to help lead the way in dismantling the old segregation system that he too saw as obsolete.
Justice Black was in error, however, when he did not interpret the constitution solely as a White social document. That’s how the supreme court routinely ruled until the War between the States (Civil War), and the world can be reminded of that as we raise up the PLEs.
<b>Question: Won’t many people interpret the embracing of White Nationalist military veterans into their own local PLE post as a radical proposition?</b>
Outsiders who are opposed to us organizing a conscious White community may think so, or represent it as such, but up until recent decades it was actually considered routine for the military and its fraternal organizations not to harass law abiding people just because of their loyalty to the race.
For further reading on the native military veteran traditions that Irish Nationalists and German Nationalists brought into the politics of their own nations, see the following:
Caulfield, Max The Easter Rebellion – Dubin 1916: Roberts Rinehart Publishers Boulder, Colorado 1995
Jones, Nigel The Birth of the Nazis – How the Freikorps Blazed a Trail for Hitler: Carroll & Graf Publishers New York, New York 2004
<b>Question: Many WNs accept that WW2 was a “civil war of the White race,” <i>but then lapse into a cult view of one side being absolutely right,</i> so what did this polarization look like in the United States?</b>
Answer: The isolationist movement which existed between 1925 and 1945 was geographically a Yankee phenomenon, while the interventionists held the southern half of this country; so those who want to refight WW2 are as dangerous to our solidarity as those who want to take Whites far beyond their regional heritages and into refighting the Civil War.
<b>Question: The Left has also long interpreted America’s Legion tradition as a native counterpart to Germany’s National Socialism and Italian fascism, even if more benign, but are there any other important correlations?</b>
Answer: Yes, in Europe the old Nationalisms have given way to a European Union, although that still hasn’t stemmed the flood of immigration by nonWhites. And here in this country our very similar tasks will be to more consciously gather (or Legion) our White ethnic nationalities into a new model society that’s capable of standing up for itself (PLE).
In Europe the tendencies for political union existed even during WW2, but many weren’t happy with the arrangement of German domination. And in the United States, White unity will require us to overcome any similar cultism for the old nationalisms while raising up PLEs.
<b>Can You recommend any further reading on all this by others?</b>
The books of Britain’s Sir Oswald Mosley can be quite useful for explaining “Europeanism,” despite the shortcoming of his emphasis being on raising up a particular kind of governing apparatus and economic program instead of concentrating more on racial and cultural matters.
<a href=”http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v05/v05p175_Stimely.html” rel=”nofollow” target=”_blank”>http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v05/v05p175_Stimely.html</a>
Additionally I would recommend the publications of such organizations as the British National Party.
<b>Aren’t the traditions of our founding fathers and Legionism really too democratic to do what has to be done?</b>
During the Civil War America had two different presidents, Lincoln and Jefferson, but both temporarily militarized their sections of the nation during that great crisis without causing undue concern to most people.
In the South, for example, preferences for state’s rights early in the conflict soon gave way to the practicalities of a coordinated defense through a Southern Nationalism. And in the North, the conspirators charged in 1865 with the assassination of Lincoln were tried by a military rather than a civilian court.
In meeting the challenge to our race today, there is nothing unnatural about bringing our native militant tradition of veteran-Legionism into the PLEs, and raising it up as our common front.
<b>Legionism as our people’s inherited militant front</b>
In the United States racialist organizations have been too isolated from most Whites to reach veterans effectively, and they have long tended to be bogged down by cultism, which is an inability to refocus from the ideologies of past racialist ideologies or update their strategies.
As many realize by this juncture, the first obstruction is easily corrected by moving the political battle over to our own higher ground (Pioneer Little Europes), and the second of these minor adjustments is also ideological:
Assimilated White people are those who are adapted to the circumstances unique to this nation’s character; they do not clash with our nativist military traditions and possess a sense for discerning when they have heard them defined correctly.
Like our brothers, sisters, and many unknown cousins in Europe, we proudly trace our particular branch of Western civilization to, among other places, ancient Greece and Rome. Even a glance at the buildings housing our government reveals that those influences are expressed in our art and architecture.
<b>A Short History of veteran and cultural Legionism</b>
If you examine the road of history spanning the past two thousand years you will also recognize the dominant position which Rome maintained. In comparison no other Western culture held such physical space with longevity.
And it was not bestowed on them by some generous quirk of nature. No, it was necessary that the Romans discover a more sophisticated method of survival, something more determined than any force that threatened to plunder their inheritance, and their legions marched.
Those earlier legions were successful for a very long time, as they were involved in a process of conquering and recruiting that expanded their boundaries, but eventually they surrendered their ethnic integrity and collapsed from within.
A similar insight also explains why today’s White soldiers, who continue their service as veteran legionaries, are part of a gathering social crisis.
Following the American Civil War – or War Between the States, as Southern nationalists describe it – America’s veterans could join such organizations as the Grand Army of the Republic or the United Soldiers of the Confederacy, and following the war with Spain they could join the Spanish American War veterans organization.
And although the forming and reforming of many organizations has generally served veterans well, it should also be noted that whenever they came into being after conflicts between White nations or states they also brought the veterans fraternal tradition one more step toward splintering, dysfunction, and obsolescence.
Today in America most White people only accept the American Legion, Forty & Eight, and the Veterans of Foreign Wars as the militant aspect within our national culture.
<i>The combined influences of those organizations is our native counterpart to any European nation’s veteran tradition, but to explain the hidden crisis growing within them let’s examine the splintering process. </i>
The American Legion, for example, was founded in 1919 in Paris at the conclusion of World War 1, by men and women aware of their European heritage, interests and identity as Americans, and eventually it became the most powerful ex-serviceman’s organizations. It was intended to be and remain an ethnic institution.
This particular legion has thousands of long established posts that serve nearly every town in America. And its meeting halls often provide the most high profile forum for civilians who organize cultural gatherings opened by expressions of their own patriotism.
Throughout the 1920s and 1930s gangsters, communists, and anarchists often terrorized towns where they knew police power was inadequate, but they were regularly routed by this people’s militia which often came out – if the danger was great enough to justify it – wielding an improvised yet effective defense.
Yet the greatest challenge to the Legion’s role emerged from within, and the Whites building Little Europes should acquire a basic grasp of the causes before they begin.
The first major crisis arrived just before World War 2, when the sympathy of many veterans for this or that European nation because of their roots or political outlook caused them to break with the parent organizations and form alternative legions (unsuccessfully).
At first there was no substantial controversy, and it was possible for the American Legion’s own National Vice Commander William Edward Eastman Jr., to extend honorary membership in 1931 to one Benito Mussolini.
Congressman Hamilton Fish, responsible for writing the Legion’s preamble at its founding, often addressed antiwar rallies with the German American Bund, Father Charles Coughlin, and the Christian Mobilizers. And the opponents of these leaders and organizations sometimes succeeded in convincing the public that even such mainstream opponents of war were Nazis.
American First included three prominent retired generals (Hugh Johnson, Thomas S. Hammond, and Robert E. Wood), loyal Americans who represented a tradition that our people still prefer to fascism. And Senator Bennett Champ Clark of Missouri and Congressman James E. Zandt of Pennsylvania, as legionnaires, assisted Colonel Charles Lindbergh’s campaign for preventing U.S. entry into war.
They all believed quite rationally that peaceful relations between our European peoples (and the nation was mostly white at that time) was an honorable goal. And even when William Dudley Pelley founded an alternative, and perhaps more radical legion, he still carefully named it the Silvershirt Legion of America. Among Pelley’s earliest organizers was Gerald L. K. Smith, former right-hand man to Louisiana Governor Huey Long.
Prior to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the isolationists peace movement sponsored by these and many other respected personalities and organizations successfully held the majority of American citizens back from entering the European conflict, as it was essentially a civil war among Whites.
The controversy was centered in Washington, DC where both sides were well entrenched and fighting it out – politically – tooth and nail. On February 8, 1940, the Hon. J. Thorkelson, a Norwegian-American representing the state of Montana, stood up near his desk in the House of Representatives to address the American people.
Mr. Thorkelson:” Mr. Speaker, in order that we many understand that warfare in England is not unanimous I shall quote from the December 1939 issue of Action (The prewar publication from the organization lead by Mosley and other British war veterans). This is generally known, but in no sense does information of this sort appear in our own papers.”
And Mr. Thorkelson went on to read a few thousand words regarding the Second World War into the Congressional Record. The Record is a compilation of the issues discussed each day by the US Government, a publication made available to every interested person.
Although the future looked bright for the peace movement, President Roosevelt – who had promised that “no American boy will ever fight Europe’s wars” – was determined to draw Americans into opposing the Axis (German, Italy, Japan, and other countries). And by 1941, Edward E. Spafford, a highly respected former National Commander, was arrested on charges of having conspired with Nazi agents.
Recognizing that many people were rightly unsympathetic about Japan’s atrocities in China, if even openly racist about Japanese, that nation’s oil supply lifeline was soon and easily cut off. But just as General William Mitchell had warned as early as 1925, during his trial for criticizing the traitorous neglect of aviation, the Japanese delivered a surprise daylight attack from the air upon Pearl Harbor.
Overnight American public opinion turned against any legionnaires still in support of an axis counterpart; so few continued into the uproar as William Pelley’s Silvershirts did. Most were as perceptive as Charles Lindbergh and abandoned the campaign immediately, accepting the position of ‘My country right or wrong. ‘
Some unassimilated Americans, however, couldn’t decern any important difference between a foreign and domestic military veterans tradition. Many even drifted ideologically so far away from other whites that they were rounded up after Pearl Harbor.
In a few cases the authorities did succeed in arresting those who might have obstructed the war effort, but most were innocently swept up in an event similar to the McCarthyism of the next era; a politically biased climate that fed on the public’s paranoia about alien militants.
Lindbergh preferred the Legion tradition, wasn’t enamored by those who organized alternatives to it as Pelley and Mosley had done, and took the time to observe them both at close quarters.
Despite this, Marxist critics and some not so perceptive cultists still promote the error that Lindbergh and his legion supporters were themselves Nazis. And they fail to grasp, or intentionally ignore, that millions of supporters in the mainstream were certainly not Nazis or Fascists either.
Leftwing extremists and their dupes attempt to blur any distinction between those who lead European fascist parties and our own legionaries, but it’s in the interest of our Pioneer Little Europes to:
1) highlight the controversy 2) support the millions of Whites still willing to argue that there is a difference 3) remain faithful to the legion tradition 4) translate any postwar ideas from Europe with that perspective, 5) confound those who would require us to explain another nation’s actions.
The second major crisis for America’s legion tradition occurred in 1959. And this was to be almost the deathblow to the Legion and other victor-veterans groups as organizations vital enough to prevent America’s gradual drift to chaos.
Blacks in North America had acquired only a partial awareness of political self-determination because they advanced, not alongside as with blacks in South Africa, but up into the very fabric of white society.
Bolstered by opportunist political and legal support from Washington, DC, those who demanded a subverted definition of American Legionism, that is minus any concern for ethnic cultural integrity, declared the whites-only restriction illegal. This was now forbidden, and those who advocated it were relegated to the political hinterland.
Pandemonium spread to Legion posts across the country as thousands of racially loyal dissenters attempted to oppose the coup d’etat by throwing their support to one of the Legion’s founding factions, The Forty and Eight (Their proper name is actually La Societe des Quarante Hommes at Huit Chevaux). The next assault came in court, and soon this especially authoritative organization for White veterans lost even the right to use the official emblem.
America’s veterans legions, as they functioned prior to the political and cultural dispossession of the White community, contributed to a White nativist identity which cleaved the traditions of separate European nationalities.
Their meeting halls became the places where veterans of English and Irish origin could join fairly with the French, Germans, Italians, Russians, and all the rest of our people; however, when those posts were captured by those who advocated no special loyalty to the cultural institutions of Whites (and no respect for the living space they need to be in), the inherited method for gathering veterans of separate nationalist politics often went unappreciated.
There are, of couse, many similiarities between the rituals employed by European and American nationalists, in military, political, and cultural forms.
Despite this, some patriotic customs in the US were changed when they seemed too suggestive of the remedies employed by movements elsewhere.
For example, from 1892 through 1942 the pledge to the flag was said with the right hand in the so-called “Bellamy” or Roman Salute postion.
The salute was created by Francis Bellamy of Rome, New York. And it was specifically intended to be used with the “Pledge of Allegiance” he authored:
This required the right hand resting first outward from the chest, then the arm extending out from the body.
After many axis countries became diplomatically estranged from the United States, some Americans viewed the position of the arm and hand as too similar, but it wasn’t until 1942 (during the war) that Congress implemented today’s practice of saying the pledge with the right hand over the heart.
Although the old salute was correctly employed by many American nationalists during their pre-war protests at Madison Square Garden in New York, as the change occurred during wartime it still causes confusion among historians and members of media; so the prewar peace campaigners are sometimes incorrectly accused of giving “a foreign salute” in the dialogue of the old news clips of Madison Square Garden.
Today’s American Legion web site also details the story, but merely says that the salute was similar enough to cause controversy without pointing out that Mr. Bellamy lived in Rome, New York.
<strong>Assessing the Pro-White Cults</strong>In PLE terminology we primarily refer to the pro-White groups which don’t take us anywhere as cults – in contrast to the types of perspectives which carry a strong potential for actually terraforming the entire White community, such as the raising up of a Stormfront of the streets (aka PLE). But the adherents of any of these views should definitely be invited to participate in a PLE’s culture revival.
I’ve participated in my own share of stagnant cults, and although I still love many of them, for the purpose of correcting the course of White Nationalism I’m going to list and discuss them candidly:
<b>The George Wallace for President Campaign</b> In 1968 I volunteered my services with these people. And as they had a headquarters in my native San Francisco, which was largely hostile territory, it was my first great political adventure. I wanted to learn everything possible about pro-White politics, and this seemed a good place to start. He was like our version of Britain’s Enoch Powell – before he was shot.
And I greatly enjoyed seeing Wallace speak at San Francisco’s huge Cow Palace arena, where he engaged his opponents in a pretty funny though highly charged shouting match. It was unlike anything I had ever seen before. The hardcore or elite within our headquarters were John Birch Society members, and so when they extended their invitation for membership, I accepted.
Then later, in 1972, David Duke was operating his own Wallace for President campaign headquarters in New Orleans, as a kind of public relations connection for his National Party, so I drove down there to help him. That turned out to be even more of an adventure, as the police and FBI got together to disrupt all of us, and Duke and I ended up sharing a jail cell. After a long weekend in really Hellish conditions, which are recalled in enormous detail in Duke’s highly worthwhile book ‘My Awakening,’ the charges were dropped.
Eventually, as everyone knows, Wallace was seriously wounded during an assassination attempt against him, his health declined and his politics seemed tamer and greatly changed. But the leading lesson eventually learned, at least for me, was that it would be foolish to place all of one’s hopes on just one person.
<b>The John Birch Society</b> I enjoyed this for awhile, as most of the people were pretty normal and the organization quite education oriented. But I felt isolated as the only really young person among them, and I didn’t like the way we members were constantly being nickeled and dimed for the postage to send out propaganda that didn’t really seem to be that interesting to most people. The situation was all too much like the exclamation frequently heard in Rome: “Ecco; ho trovato una mano nella mia tasca! Behold, I have found a hand in my pocket!” And although the unit leader expressed some disappointment when I eventually telephoned to drop out, explaining that I was looking for more action, it wasn’t anything that he hadn’t heard before.
<b>The National Socialist White People’s Party</b> (formerly the American Nazi Party) I remember suffering a peculiar kind of emotional collapse shortly before seeking out “the Nazis.” Here again I was pre-accepted for full membership within a short time, but I decided to remain just an official supporter. There was certainly much that made sense in the NSWPP, in fact, some of their views were a major revelation, but there were also countless things that came up which convinced me that trying to import this idea root and branch into Amerca had only turned into a disfunctional cultism.
<b>William Dudley Pelley-ism</b> I remember the first time someone handed me a book by Pelley and I was immediately charmed. It was all so otherworldly, and many was the time when I would sit in the quiet of a bookstore and just pretend it was the 1930s and the Silvershirts were on the march. There was much to love about Pelley: His pure unadultrated Americanism, his efforts to be honest about Jewish influence, the futuristic style of the Silvershirts, his concern for the downtrodden, and a dashing personal style. Years later, however, I would come to realize that most people weren’t really ever going to try figure out what Pelley’s religious views were all about. And Charles Lindbergh appeared as a sympathetic witness when Pelley was unfairly arrested during the war, but even he saw Pelley’s politics as a bit too rough and problematic.
<b>Francis Parker Yockey-ism</b> Yockey supporters comprise an important thread in today’s pro-White politics, although most would be hard pressed to tell you what the tormented Yockey was all about. They usually remember very little of Yockey’s own book Imperium, outside of Willis Carto’s incredibly good introduction, and that is a much repeated observation from readers. I first met Carto and his two leading promoters of Yockeyism in 1970 (and even Yockey’s jackbooted and very pretty daughter when she visited the NSWPP), as they promoted it through the National Youth Alliance just before William Pierce bought the organization (And Pierce eventually renamed it the National Alliance).
In their own time, neither of Carto’s representatives were very expert in relating what Yockey was all about, so they constantly relapsed into their own interpretations of German National Socialism to fill in the empty spaces. And remarkably, the second in command was even dating a pretty Chinese woman but made no secret of the matter!
Both of these people eventually dropped out of pro-White politics, and they left behind only debt, anger, and hundreds of rifled envelopes (from those who wanted publication subscriptions) for William Pierce to try cope with.
And recycled or repackaged National Socialism leads to enough frustration for those who persist in trying to import it, let alone Yockey’s intellectualism, so William Pierce immediately abandoned that entire spin.
Then how is Yockeyism important? In this way: The Yockey cult, which I also subscribed to in 1970, is additional evidence that pro-White politics is bogged down by hazy ideas, suicidal tendencies, and an unprogressive elitism that has been long celebrated merely because it can look good on paper.
The proWhite movement has long settled for much less than it really can be, with dreamers, boasters, and the occasional death in despair actually becoming a far more fashionable trend than even in Yockey’s time.
Today’s further declined environment has spawned few real leaders and many without military experience. These have never known camaraderie, the horrors of war, building community, or even a higher authority.
And some form cults to gain a safe and comfortable existence for themselves, while they spend their time creating publications and pitch letters to motivate OTHERS to sacrifice everything.
The latter anomaly would not be much of a problem except for one thing, there isn’t a conscious community for the suicidal to even represent. And those who do survive the mismanagement of our race’s destiny will never see a dime for legal expenses from the unchanged and unworthy old White community.
Motivated by an obsolete politics from the past, but hardly understanding even that, many would willinginly die for all the wrong reasons. They would not be so far off the track if they had read the Pioneer Little Europe prospectus, as it is today’s alternative to Yockeyism – and any other cult.
Our people actually require military veterans who have the discipline to be the community builders of a more ethical pro-White politics. We need those who are really worthy of leading the conscious community during every challenge to it. And our people, who are mostly millions engaged in more ordinary tasks and thoughts, need guides who don’t require interpreters for such an urgent message.
<b>The National Youth Alliance / National Alliance</b> I eventually left the NSWPP in 1970 when a major split occurred. I was accompanied by the late Dr. William Pierce, who was the party’s second in command; Robert Lloyd, who had been the third in command; and Pierce’s secretary Earl, for whom the Turner Diaries would eventually be named. In some ways the NYA, which eventually become the NA while I was there, was much closer to what I thought was the right approach, but Earl, Lloyd, and myself all decided to leave when Dr. Pierce revealed that he was intent on publicly and privately encouraging our supporters – though never himself – into a high risk lifestyle of revolutionary adventure.
This was an enormous disappointment to me, as I knew by then that only a conscious community would ever support anyone physically fighting for its existence. I spoke to Pierce about this widely known dictum, and after realizing that he was determined to generate martyrs anyway, I got out while there was still time to avoid any involvement in the unknown disaster that was surely to come. And that was an option General Longstreet didn’t have when he saw the planning for Pickett’s Charge.
How was this even possible? Well, “Years ago a Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram established that almost two-thirds of people would be willing to administer electric shocks to others – even to the point of a lethal 450 volts – simply because they were ordered to do so by a scientist in a white lab coat.”
As a former physics professor, Dr. Pierce was both proud and conscious of how he continued to carry around that kind of authority. Unlike most people, however, he actually had the moxie to ask the most idealistic to give everything possible to him.
It was while associating with Dr. Pierce that I began working on creating PLE-Legionism as an alternative, but the final pieces would not actually be fitted together until about 2000. And once it was assembled, I was able to see more clearly than I had ever thought possible
Years after I left, Robert Matthews came along to support Pierce, and there was no limit to what he’d give. Pierce’s closing years were expertly recorded in the book ‘Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds.” It reveals a man who has by that time roused so much anger and received so many threats from so many strangers of his own race that he’s taken up the habit of carrying a gun even far out in the country.
After Pierce passed away I communicated for a short time with one of his sons, whom I had not seen since he was about six. For him the political spell had been broken long ago, and I understood immediately when he said he loved his father all the same.
<b>United Klans of America</b> Located in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, a remarkably beautiful place throughout the year, my first contact with this organization was actually by way of its very well constructed magazine. Their articles were sober and well written, but there was also ample evidence of a robust social life associated with the group.
Eventually, however, I read that the organization fell victim to a law suit. An apparent agent provocateur was convicted of killing a black person, and merely based on the allegation that the killer was someone associated with the UKA, the organization lost its headquarters and assets to the family of the victim.
It was certainly an underhanded way to kill off a pro-White group, and it would be like doing the same thing to the Republicans and Democrats solely because most serial killers are associated with mainstream politics.
It also saddened me personally, as I had once spent a long morning of socializing with Imperial Wizard Robert Shelton. He was the perfect host, and we were especially reveted by his detailed recount of being thrown in jail for not betraying his membership list to the government. This included an explanation on how he had, after being threatened by Blacks, resorted to routinely keeping a weight in a sock just in case he had to fight for his life.
The most important thing to remember about the UKA’s eventual destruction, however, is the way our opponents easily established a connection to the people held financially liable and relied upon jurors who had long been conditioned to believe that pro-White groups are always wrong (The Aryan Nations organization of Idaho was destroyed with the exact same tactic). In a PLE community neither of those “soft target” conditions would exist.
<b>Wilmot Robertsonism</b> In the early 1970s the book The Dispossessed Majority was published by the late Wilmot Robertson, and its arrival was widely celebrated in our area of politics. I think this was because no one up until that time had really defined the collapse of the White community in such amazing detail. I was so personally enthusiastic about the book that I soon sold copies of it to most of the people at my workplace. In fact, I received shipments of books to sell on both the east and west coasts. This infatuation with Roberts lasted for a long time, and it was regularly enticed along with each issue of his intellectual journal Instauration and another book called Ethnostate.
Eventually, however, I took a very cool and sober look at what Robertson was all about, and realized that there were limitations to this very intellectual pitch as well. For example, his Nordic orientation was so strong that it was enough to offend the many White Americans who either didn’t fit that description or weren’t sure what their racial “value” might be. But the most important limitation, which didn’t occur to me until I completed the construction of the PLE Prospectus and could see it clearly from that perspective, was that Robertson had somehow overlooked something as basic as an accessible local step for his call to nation building.
<b>Irish Blueshirt-ism</b> As my family is Irish and we emmigrated to this country when I was six (plus a return to school in Ireland at 15), I developed a very strong fascination with the Blue Shirt movement of the 1930s. It’s still a powerful cultism on Stormfront Ireland, and a kind of eye candy that appeals very strongly to the heart but not always to the brain. And it wasn’t until I took a more detached view that I realized all the following: That I would probably always love the Blueshirts, but that the Catholic orientation of anything like this would never win most of the people of Northern Ireland, as they are Protestants. And there were many other good reasons why most of the Irish got over Blueshirts, such as their determination not to further fuel the hatreds of the Irish civil war or any controversies about WW2 Germany, but to this day I’m uncomfortable with the Fine Gael Party downplaying, ignoring, or erasing their Blueshirt adventure.
<b>Oswald Mosely-ism</b> My curiosity with the Mosley movement began about 1968, then really exploded a few years later when a Ballintine picture book was issued with many startling pictures which were very much like something from Hitler’s Germany. And again, as with Irish Blueshirtism, because of my having actually been born in England I became emotionally commited. And it was all that much stronger because of a family story passed on to me about an uncle who was mentioned on wartime radio by William Joyce (Lord Haw Haw), a prominent ex-British Union of Fascists and National Socialist leader.
My biggest surprise when researching Mosley was the discovery that he was even the highest caliber of thinker and writer that I had ever encountered in years of reading, but initially I did not realize that he was just as capable of making extraordinary blunders. Without a doubt, anyone could still learn a lot by reading his experiences and his conclusions. He was right about the need for a European movement in the US, as well, so I contributed a number of essays for his secretary Jeffery Hamm to publish in his tabloid Action.
Later I contributed a piece for Diana Mosley’s intellectual journal Lodestar. She was a fascinating person to exchange an occasional letter with, and I was quite conscious of how she had once been part of Hitler’s inner circle of friends. When her sister Jessica passed away in Oakland, which is just across the bay from where I live in San Francisco, we again exchanged a few letters about the funeral.
Eventually, however, after Lady Mosley passed away, I decided to move on to other interests. I had expended enough time with the Mosleyites, and came to a much deeper understanding of why they had not thrived after the war.
Before WW2 OM had good reason to believe in himself, as his personal accomplishments were beyond practically anyone else in Britain prior to the outbreak of WW2, but his close identification with NS Germany’s leadership – which had once included even the use of the NSDAP’a marching music – eventually caused both the authorities and the public to fear him. How did this happen?
Mosley gambled on an all-or-nothing campaign to oppose war with Germany; incorrectly estimating that he had a chance of winning that issue during the “Phoney war” period. As first he appeared to be doing well, but when Germany invaded Norway the public turned against him. Mosely was arrested on May 23, 1940, and his reputation was destroyed, with the public even continuing to associate him with Hitler’s ethnic cleansing in Poland and the war of extermination in Russia
Mosley logically wanted to avoid being arrested after the war, as he had been at its outbreak, so he permitted only a casual cult with a much lower emphasis on race (and practically none on Jews) to grow around him. Primarily he concerned himself with a blend of justifications of the past, and an economic and organizing remedy called Europe a Nation, As was the case with Robertson, the latter did not offer any local access for its implementaion.
Some in the media correctly observed however, that Mosley would have made an exceptionally good social commentator much like America’s Pat Buchanan, as there was an amazing clarity to his thinking and he always had England’s interests at heart.
<b>William Riker’s Holy City or Perfect Christian Divine Way</b> I first heard about Riker and Holy City back in 1968. The news came from a young man in the NSWPP from San Mateo, as he had once visited there, and eventually I was spurred to find about four web pages on this subject myself and the book sold on Amazon.com.
Once I got the general idea of the Holy City story, and figured out where this place is hidden from the modern world of political correctness, I felt compelled to visit personally.
It’s mostly an empty crossroads in the woods, and I got lost a couple of times trying to arrive there, but it was worth it to meet Tom of the Holy City Glass Shop and to see the outside of Riker’s old house. Tom’s very good with the occasional visitor who comes out of curiosity, although his business isn’t related to what Riker had there, and he was able to answer every question I posed.
Often denounced as an eccentric cult leader, Riker is still fondly remembered as the most colorful character in the history of the San Carlos, California area. His Utopia was located on this mountainous summit to the west of the downtown area, between San Jose and the seaside community of Santa Cruz, and it lasted from 1918 until most of it was sold in 1959.
Contrary to being a failure, we can view that time span as a record run when compared to the life of any other pro-White group.
Riker erected large garish signs and displays to advertise his ideas about religion and the white race, and his commercial buildings provided all manner of roadside attractions to travelers, including a restaurant, gas station, amusement parlor, hotel, soda pop bottling plant, print shop, barber shop, telescope, and radio station.
Adopting the tactic of designating “teachers” for his recruits, much as early Christians did (Although there never was a church built in Holy City), Riker routinely transformed even the homeless into loyal and confident supporters. And it was often they who operated the many Holy City services so appreciated by motorists. During World War 2 his politically contradictory and outspoken passions for both the German and Jewish peoples nearly got him convicted of treason.
The highway cuts through the mountains to connect San Jose to Santa Cruz, but business largely collapsed there when the site was bypassed by the modern highway. All that remains of the original Holy City is a few private buildings and the natural background which appears in some of the old photos; Riker’s house, garage, and storage shed are difficult to see from the road as they are partially blocked by the trees which grew up since.
Across the street from the Riker house is Tom’s glass shop, on part of the property that Riker established for commerical use, and Tom keeps some faded copies of Riker’s old newspaper posted on a bulletin board.
Riker’s own published materials from Holy City include: The Philosophy of the Nerves; the New Jewish Religion; World Peace & How To Have It, and many smaller publications such as his Enlightener newsletter in 1917; Sheet Music titled “Please Don’t Leave Me, Daddy” in 1945; The leaflet “I Will Come Again” in the 1950s; “A 16 Point Program” in the 50s; and “Make Me Your Next President” in the 1950s. Materials such as these rarely pop up even as collectibles, so Betty Lewis’s book is the most useful explanation available.
My impression of Riker is probably more positive than the way most people see him today, although I obviously don’t agree with everything he said on race. And his religious views look a lot like what was popular in my father’s day, but Riker was certainly more eccentric or poetic in the way he expressed himself. My impression is that Riker was very much a product of his own time.
<b>European American Issues Forum</b> In the San Francisco Bay Area this is the strongest pro-White organization. The EAIF leadership does not have, however, a White Nationalist or supremacist orientation. In fact, its especially moderate approach appears to be quite appropriate for the challenging political environment it has to operate in.
An examination of EAIF’s web site and printed materials reveals that it does an exceptionally good job at responding to the cultural genocide that undermines Whites from the government, courts, and media, and it doesn’t shy away from the physical and emotional genocide of Black crime either.
The EAIF does not, however, tackle the touchy issue of inviolate living spaces for Whites – including from Jews – and how they might go about securing them; much as the Chinese, Black, and Hispanic communities are all routinely accommodated territorial integrity without protests or legal action.
It’s especially important to note that the type of person who’s attracted to the EAIF works within the system; so their activists would have a special advantage when swamping the political organizations in any PLE target area.
As the position of Whites is quite desperate today, many EAIF activists are likely to be receptive to our proposal to raise up an “Uncontrolled White Nationalist Culture” in a selected target area, and even to do so alongside the growing number of WNs who became socially isolated cultists after long being relegated to a non-community status through no fault of their own.
Reference on scientists in white coats: San Francisco Chronicle August 13, 2006
<b>Invisible Empires & Sacred Spaces by H. Michael Barrett</b>
This series of questions and answers is relevant to an article that follows, so I’d like to share it with you as an introduction:
QUESTION: For those who don’t know where this is coming from, Mr. Barrett, can you relate your own Klan background?
ANSWER: My first contact with the Klan was in 1965 at Fort Gordon, an army base for advanced military training in Georgia, where one of Robert Shelton’s most able organizers was my platoon sergeant, but even that early on I sensed that the times had changed and so I held back from joining. Then in 1972 I decided to accept David Duke’s invitation to work at the Nationalist Party in New Orleans, where I served as his organizer and as one of about three advisors he referred to occasionally.
QUESTION: Yes, Duke mentions you and that group throughout a chapter in his autobiography ‘My Awakening.’ The Nationalist Party was a kind of precursor to his more traditional looking Klan, but without the robes and rituals, correct?
Answer: Yes, that’s about the best way to describe it.
QUESTION: And it was from there that Duke decided to set up the more elaborate Klan organization that is more vividly associated with his youth, right?
ANSWER: Yes, that’s correct. He was being encouraged to take on a more radical appearance by his main advisor and backer.
QUESTION: When did this transition in his plans come about?
ANSWER: That was just a few days after we had all gotten out of Parish Prison, another incident recounted in his book.
QUESTION: Yes, you shared a cell with Duke there. And so when you both got out and Duke informed you that he was going to take this direction of developing a more traditional looking Klan, what was your response to him?
ANSWER: I said that it conflicted with the assessment I had already made about how White society had evolved. Our people had not merely collapsed politically and culturally, but now required the kind of leadership and remedies that were also evolved enough to rouse them.
QUESTION: What did these cultural changes in the White community have to do with the Klan’s prospects?
ANSWER: It has everything to do with it. Whites today require leaders who have such qualities as military experience, education, an appealing image on television, and some distance from those who prostitute Klancraft tradition for settling personal scores, or who are addicted to them as a cultism separate from military veterans and the racial community.
QUESTION: How did Duke react to this description of the situation from you?
ANSWER: He said that he actually realized much the same thing, but as he was under some pressure to take the more traditional route anyway, he still asked how we could use elements of the plan I had drawn up.
QUESTION: Now we’re getting to my favorite part, as you’re talking about PLE Legionism in its earliest stages.
ANSWER: That’s correct. Duke spoke of his intention to take up Klan rituals, and I informed him that I had faith in a different way of gathering our people and wouldn’t be able to remain with him at that time.
Much to my surprise, however, he was still willing to ask me how the gist of the plan could be utilized, even though it wasn’t all sorted out even in my mind. And eventually I was able to come back into a more united effort with him, as I do today from Stormfront.
QUESTION: You departed from Duke and the Nationalist Party just days after this conversation, but eventually contributed to his election campaigns. But did you respond to that unexpected question before going?
ANSWER: I recognized that Duke was being pressured to go against his own best instincts, but as PLE is constructed so as to permit even portions of what’s right to be applied, my reply was that it should be at least a new kind of Klan; in other words, a more highly evolved form of invisible empire.
QUESTION: Are you, then, the person who actually put him onto that?
ANSWER: I don’t think so, because he quickly responded by saying he was already planning to make it into a more evolved and relevant kind of klan.
QUESTION: Well, it’s still a fascinating moment in history. And I’m curious about what you would have preferred him to do, because based on what you’re saying about the pressure from others, he seems to have had it in him to get on the right road a lot sooner.
ANSWER: When Duke eventually left most of the traditional trappings of the Kan behind, and most conscious Whites see that was the correct thing to do, he focused on gaining the solid support of the community and its veteran legionnaires. And he certainly succeeded on both counts.
QUESTION: Does that mean that Duke left the Klan behind?
ANSWER: He certainly left any rootless Klan cultism behind, and exchanged it for the far more useful support of the White community and its veterans. That’s what the priority had always been to Nathan Bedford Forrest as well.
QUESTION: I’m beginning to grasp what this is all about for the first time, but does it mean abandoning all the old Klan traditions?
ANSWER: When Nathan Bedford Forrest closed his form of Klan, it was because of changed conditions. And while any Klan form that has become obsolete today should also be closed, that does not prevent us from raising up PLEs which thrive on being partly invisible.
Additionally, the cultural revival in a PLE should include popular reminders of Klan history for a wider audience; be those t-shirt images of films like ‘Birth of a Nation’ and ‘Gone With the Wind,’ or reprinted novels by Thomas Dixon.
<a href=”http://docsouth.unc.edu/dixonclan/menu.html” rel=”nofollow” target=”_blank”>http://docsouth.unc.edu/dixonclan/menu.html</a>
QUESTION: And so what you’re saying is that we’re on the verge of seeing some sort of rebirth of the invisible community as an idea our people will respond to again, but this is within the context of the PLE’s cultural revival?
ANSWER: That’s correct, as each PLE serves as the vessel of that cultural revival; like the relationship of a launcher to a rocket.
QUESTION: Although the culture revival from PLEs and veteran legionism is widely supported by White Nationalists in cyberspace now, because they haven’t been constructed yet many of us can’t visualize this strategy.
ANSWER: The initial stage of any PLE must remain as invisible as the present Klan cults until the leases of each business core is signed, but even when operating normally it’s in everyone’s interest not to openly identify many of the residents and supportive visitors.
QUESTION: That reminds me of that scene in ‘Gone With the Wind’ when the men folk, all returned confederate veterans, went out at night and thrashed the heck out of the criminals who had set up their camp on the edge of town.
ANSWER: Yes, an important part of our culture revival is the claiming of any and every film that has even the slightest proWhite spin. And our people can’t just sit back and watch endless reruns of Griffith’s Birth of A Nation either.
This new kind of “invisible empire” must constantly reach Whites with its own films and many other forms of merchandise. And nearly everyone should at least try their hand at some artistic craft to generate lots of products.
These are to raise consciousness and establish an uncontrolled White Nationalist culture that spans all across the local living space.
QUESTION: Do you project that we’ll be selling Klan robes, Klan pocket knifes, and related books?
ANSWER: Every pro-White person visiting a PLE, pitching political ideas there, or setting up a business in its environment, will be free to sell whatever they want about the Klan, as it’s an important part of White history. And even those who want to sell books that are highly critical of the obsolete Klans and vigilantes holding us back should also be welcomed.
QUESTION: Pro-White people are divided on how to interpret Klan history, with British comrades especially amazed at how much controversy we tolerate here, but do you visualize the shops actually banning any books about the Klan?
ANSWER: Ideally we should see the world’s largest selection of pro-White books, and if some of those are critical about giving our communities over to vigilantes, or being dominated by bully’s, posers, or loose cannon cultists who have no military experience or community support, so be it. The real Klan is always something capable of being community supported, and anything less is merely a cultism barely existing at the bottom of history’s trashcan.
<i>One of the more peculiar things which happened during the Invasion of Normandy and the rest of France during WW2 was the manner in which the Allies decided to deal with some of the strongest fortresses.
These would have required the expenditure of enormous resources and losses before they’d be overcome, so the allies decided to simply bypass them. Yes, some of the strongholds held on for a very long time, but after the remaining battles were fought every one of them surrendered.
The “Uncontrolled White Nationalist Culture” that will be released by a Stormfront of the Street (aka PLE), simply because of the concentration of so many of us, is also like the chaos of battle on another level, but it’s in our interests to go around many traditional opponents when it’s possible.
As many of you know, no matter what the personal spin is of any particular WN individual or group, all are welcome to enter into the struggle. None are even required to adhere to any recommendations in order to participate, but here are those recommendations in question and answer form for all those who will be guided by them:</i>
<b>QUESTION: For more than a half century White Nationalists and National Socialists have emerged from the political closet on many a weekend to physically smash Marxists. Will this go on from the stronghold of a PLE?</b>
ANSWER: Modern Marxist groups tend to be comprised of many self-hating Whites, and they’re going to be particularly interested in disrupting anyone fitting their stereotype of a WN in the open streets of the PLE; so a certain amount of conflict is likely to continue for some time. Despite all that, we should not have any kind of ban even in the target area against any books authored by the old school racialists who were Marxists, such as Jack London and James Connolly, who opposed the social abuses of their times
<b>QUESTION: As you’ve said yourself that Marxism is another dysfunctional cultism, don’t you think that this kind of tolerance and “letting the controversy float a little bit” is still dangerous to our efforts.</b>
ANSWER: No, it won’t be dangerous to our efforts, but rather a case of placing the rise and collapse of the Marxists in proper perspective. When social abuses ran rampant in this country, Marxism did thrive in some quarters, but it’s never really come close to winning the contest with a free enterprise system capable of occasionally making modest social adjustments.
We would actually risk losing a lot by going out and physically harassing any political minority that isn’t being overtly anti-White (they exist). And many pro-White populists, libertarians, and conservatives have always taken that view.
McCarthy and Hitler both had some bitter experiences using their hard-line approaches. In McCarthy’s case he never caught on to how Marxism operated like a baited trap: Opponents get a bit paranoid, trample around like bulls in a China shop to stamp it out, and then suffer major political setbacks for causing the kind of damage that many observers won’t support.
And Hitler was willing to risk the future of Germany in a life or death struggle with Marxism, but the Russian variety he focused upon eventually collapsed from its own economic falsehoods while competing with the U.S.military establishment.
A PLE’s residents will bring with them all kinds of approaches for competing with the Marxists; some will be implemented from within the system, and some implemented from outside the system, but in recent decades let’s acknowledge that our foot within the system is what will probably get the best results.
Nixon got the US out of Vietnam and established a very strong economic relationship with China. I’m not saying it’s perfect, because it’s far from that, but it’s better than many other ways of dealing with the Reds. And in all seriousness, it would be difficult to find a modern economist who isn’t going to credit Marx and Engels with useful contributions to their very peculiar discipline.
<i>The often overlooked Engels is actually the person who outlined for Marx the pamphlet which eventually became the Communist Manifesto, and Engels contributed the kind of clarity which reached a mass audience.</i>
<b>QUESTION: How do you think our own historians should view the Marxists?</b>
ANSWER: Marxism has almost completely exhausted itself in the European world, and the collapse was strongly underway by the early part of the last century, when fascism and national socialism appeared on the scene. In fact, it’s difficult to imagine those movements arising without the trauma of Marxism first. And millions of Europeans didn’t care if those alternatives were Marxist heresies or not, as they seemed to offer an enormous relief from the horrors of social upheaval.
The number of Jews in leadership positions was and still is very high in the communist movements of many countries, but I would advise against using a slogan like “Communism is Jewish,” because during the early days of both Christianity and Italian fascism Jews were also in the front ranks
This is not to suggest that they are the same as us, as Jews tend to remain true to their own interests wherever they are. And any future PLE (or Stormfront of the street) needs to be seen as a new type of White ethnic community that’s not for Jews.
<b>QUESTION: That’s a good point to bring up, as many White Nationalists are quite concerned about how we can retain our ethnic (as in race and culture) purity; but how do you feel about the use of force for that purpose?</b>
Our community, and the best elements who are apart of it, must be preserved by whatever means are necessary, but it should also be made clear to our supporters that most people will be a lot more candid about their genealogical inheritance if they have reason to believe that their personal dignity, social status, and safety isn’t going to be seriously compromised by giving honest answers.
<b>QUESTION: You appear to be saying that a PLE (or Stormfront of the street, aka the complex White ethnic group) should not be viewed as the ultimate gene pool).</b>
ANSWER: That’s right, a PLE should still have a kind of general or visual ethnic integrity, as goes on already in the existing White society and the groups which champion it, but then it must also include the many kinds of purist groups which would draw the best people from this pool of the consciously White to form a more elite or idealized body. The first manner of organization serves to retain the loyalty and influence of every possible friend, and the latter is the direction we’ll move toward.
<b>QUESTION: And who should be doing that, a group like the National Alliance?</b>
ANSWER: Among all those who claim to represent the elite, the NA should be drawn into the competitive process, but then any WN or NS people who are in ideological disagreement about them should also be drawn in.
<b>QUESTION: Racial integrity is the central issue for us, so isn’t it natural to hate anyone who’s racially mixed?</b>
Nature gives people the opportunity to breed up or down, and all across the area where Europe meets Asia there are entire nations which have had racially mixed populations for centuries. China and Japan still have traces of the White tribes which migrated there long before recorded history, and even today’s Philippinos are largely a productive of mixing. Under those circumstance there is no logical reason to take on all these peoples as active opponents. It is much better to save our energy for fighting all those who are more actively trying to obstruct our preference for racial integrity. We can peacefully negotiate with all others without needlessly clashing with them.
<b>QUESTION: Your open invitation to White Nationalists of all ideological spins to come into a targeted area to concentrate their influence is going to attract all kinds of people who have no culture, including some real barbarians who advocate that we wait until after “the revolution” to have a cultural revival. Are they right?</b>
It’s a balancing act. On one hand the racial materialism of the barbarians will motivate our opponents to vacate the living space, but the old model of White community has an obsolete culture, the only source of any people’s survival tools, so we need an ongoing cultural revival.
As many people have noticed here at Stormfront – and will notice in any future PLE target area – there are WNs on both sides of practically any issue.
Some, for example, say that it’s possible to import the National Socialism of Germany and rescue our people with it.
Others, however, maintain that although it’s true that various forms of National Socialism (or social nationalism ) are found internationally, that that trick isn’t going to work. And that one must use the patriotic tradition of one’s own country.
Not surprisingly, some WNs get very angry when they encounter anyone who opposes them on some pet issue or spin, and will sometimes try to chase them and their much needed funds off the forum.
The aggressor usually, and quite incorrectly, thought Stormfront was some sort of purist group with a completed ideology, or got it in their mind that we needed something like that immediately and decided to be the self-appointed bouncer.
Stormfront is quite welcoming to entire purist groups, and to any individuals who haven’t found one to their liking, but it does not claim to be itself a purist group.
That’s the secret to the world’s largest WN forum, and it’s also the secret to any future PLE, which needs to release an uncontrolled (actually we’ll all control it) White Nationalist culture in a local area for all others to avoid.
The less accommodating purists, however, occasionally cost us supportive friends; those who came here to learn but who then dropped away when an angry or outraged political veteran took the hardline view that they “aren’t real White Nationalists so they must be expendable.”
Whenever we saw this happening – and it has happened on both the public face of Stormfront and the invisible forum open only to contributors – it was painful to see because the “loyal opposition” is very important to us.
Fortunately Stormfront already has rules in place about civility, but there are also political advantages to being respectful of our own political minorities.
Imagine a Christian or a Marxist meeting a civil stranger, but then telling that stranger that they’re a complete idiot or the enemy because of what they believe. That would usually close the door, and even drive them into a greater opposition.
Despite the common sense of what I’m telling you, you’re probably also aware of how that sort of attitude has been quite prevalent in the pro-White politics of recent decades.
That’s the kind of politics which goes on mostly from the political closet, or by weekend warriors, or cultists; those not raising up a conscious community in the real world.
On the other hand, if we look around at all our competitors and opponents, those who are thriving politically, we’d notice that most of those are quite tolerant of their “loyal opposition,” or the nonconformists within their own community.
Then there’s the Republicans and Democrats, separate parts of one system. They frequently argue on the surface, but both wings are not only loyal to the system’s survival but quite capable of being civil with each other whenever appropriate.
Or look at the main parties in the Republic of Ireland, which began with opposing views that once sparked a civil war, but today both sides accept the reality that they are traditional parts within a larger Irish Nationalist system.
As for White Nationalism, the basic outline of what we’ll be doing in the future is right here on the Internet; something that would be roughly described as a ‘Pioneer Little Europe’ or ‘Stormfront of the Street.’
Many miss the point as soon as they hear any name at all, as there is no such thing as the perfect name, but the type of community we’re talking about is likely to have many of the same characteristics as what we’re using here.
* A general civility will prevail within the target areas of these open communities.
* There will be people pitching all kinds of pro-White spins, even contrasting ones, but there will usually be a majority on most controversies who will get their way.
* WN political minorities may occasionally be ignored even when they are right about something, but whenever the “loyal majority” stumbles, necessity will open up another chance for the minority view to win over the entire community.
* If we required purist views about everything, and didn’t have much to resolve, it would NOT actually be to our disadvantage. That’s because any PLE target area needs to be seen as OUR place to work out OUR own controversies.
Outsiders will not want to remain in the heat of that kind of kitchen, and that will prompt them to voluntarily and legally flee our living space.
* It is also important to note, because there are many views long associated with White Nationalism, that our opponents are going to prefer the predictable and impotent ways of the past. They’re not going to be as happy to see us raise up a community in the real world where the minority views of many White Nationalists confound any propaganda stereotypes.
<strong>The Pioneer Little Europe Prospectus – Part Five</strong> <hr size=”1″ style=”background-color: #d1d1e1; color: #d1d1e1;” />
The following is primarily written for Americans:
Pro-White activism requires a revival of grass-roots veteran legionism. And a legion hall must be established within the politics and social life of Pioneer Little Europe.
Cultists cannot and will not do that, as they are content with a mere recycling of someone else’s militant tradition and all the beaten up baggage that encumbers it.
They have a less complete loyalty to their own nation’s militant tradition, and tend to gain few representatives who have military experience at all.
They develop a kind of leadership that does not greatly value negotiation, peace, or the camaraderie that’s good for the safety of their rank and file; for lacking more traumatic experiences with conflict those values do not come to maturity.
Our opponents have long dreaded the return of a native legionism to its role within White racialist politics. They are much less fearful of any cultism, which many describe as another nation’s mimic and not its counterpart, but that is a tangle for the historians to unravel as our main concern is practical politics:
Our opponents sometimes call us “nazis” or “fascists,” but the builders of Pioneer Little Europe are actually populists and legionnaires within a much more modern cultural revival.
That even Hitler himself required a fresh movement, and would not have imported or recyled something else, is easy to demonstrate from his own book Mein Kampf:
1) “I had long since made up my mind to take up political activity; that this could only be a new movement was also clear to me, so far only the instigation for action had not come.”H.M 1939 pg 299
2) “With this the first leading principles and lines of direction for a fight which was to do away with a veritable host of handed-down conceptions and opinions and with unclear, even injurious goals were issued.”H.M. 1939 pg 563
3) “The more practically undefinable this conception is (folkish), the more and freer interpretation its permits, the more increases also the possibility of having recourse to it.”H.M. 1939 pg 501
4) “Secondly, however, one should remember the following: every and even the best idea becomes a danger as soon as it pretends to be an end in itself, but in reality only represents a means to an end; for myself and all true National Socialists there is only one doctrine: people and country.”H.M. 1939 pg 288
For those who may interpret this as a “temporary view” of Hitler’s, it is repeated with the invasion of Russia:
5) “Germany has never attempted to spread its National Socialist worldview to Russia. Rather, the Jewish-Bolshevist rulers in Moscow have constantly attempted to subject us and the other European peoples to their rule.” (Hitler’s Speech to the German people June 22, 1941)
And the next year.
6) “I am firmly opposed to any attempt to export National Socialism.” Ref: Hitler, Adolf ‘The Secret Conversations of Adolf Hitler’ New York, New York: Farrar, Straus and Young, N. Y. 1953 pg 397 (Part 223 of the Bormann-Vermerke notes for the 20th of May, 1942) * Sometimes listed as Feb. 21, 1945
And then just as clearly at the end of his career:
7) “The National Socialist doctrine, as I have always proclaimed, is not for export. It was conceived for the German people. Ref: Hitler, Adolf ‘The Testament of Adolf Hitler’ February- April 1945: L. Craig Fraser edition, circa 1972 page 58 (xiii)
Then from Goebbels:
8) “National Socialism is a completely German phenomenon. It can only be understood in the framework of German conditions and forces. Like Mussolini once said about Fascism, “it is not for export.” Goebbels’ speech on the occasion of the first Nuremberg Rally that followed Hitler’s 1933 takeover of power, published as “Rassenfrage und Weltpropaganda,” Reichstagung in Nürnberg 1933 (Berlin: Vaterländischer Verlag C. A. Weller, 1933), pp. 131-142.
9) Then there are the extracts from the Speech by Dr. Goebbels, September 10, 1938: “Never have we left anyone in doubt that National-Socialism is not for export.” Ref. Documents on International Affairs, vol.II, 1938, pp.17-19.
Then this: “Concerned that the success of the National Socialist system was subverting the less successful Capitalist “democracies” the Times [1 April 1938] charged Hitlers Germany with exporting their superior system:
10) “We are reproached with carrying on propaganda. No, National Socialism is to us such a dear, holy German cause that we feel inclined to pray that God may keep it primarily for our own people. Let the other nations foster their own ideals.” FRANKFURT, 31 MARCH 1938.
11) Diana Mitford Mosley, an inner circle friend of Hitler’s who spoke German (unlike her husband Oswald Mosley until his wartime imprisonment) even had the advantage of hearing this privately in person – without anyone from the media present – and continued to confirm it after the war.’
http://www.oswaldmosley.com/loved_ones/lovedones1.html” rel=”nofollow” target=”_blank”>Oswald Mosley – Briton, Fascist, European
12) Dr. William Pierce’s personal secretary, Earl Thomas (whose name inspired the Turner Diaries) informed the founder of PLE how – in order to become a full fledged member of the Koehl/Pierce/ Lloyd NSWPP in 1967 – he had been sworn to secrecy about never bringing up “those darn quotes of Hitler’s about not exporting National Socialism.”
13) From the Canadian Zundelsite comes this: “We MUST become nationalists and fight for the rights of our people. To do less would be abject surrender. The Nazis themselves used to say that National Socialism was not for export. They were correct.” http://www.zundelsite.org/english/zg…11/981110.html” rel=”nofollow” target=”_blank”>Zundelsite (Zundelsite.org)
And Louisiana’s favorite son, former governer Huey P. Long, is often quoted saying something quite similar, though it has many variations:
14) “If Fascism (or Germany’s unique variety of it, National Socialism) comes to the United States it will be on a program of Americanism.” http://quotes.fablis.com/index.php/Huey_P._Long” rel=”nofollow” target=”_blank”>fablis.com
And finally there’s what historian Robert Cecil recorded in his book about the offically designated philosopher of German National Socialism, Alfred Rosenberg:
15) “Rosenberg himself maintained that the Mythus has been written for Germans and denied that he had wanted to see it translated into other languages, though there had been a Japanese version.” Reference: Cecil, Robert ‘The Myth of the Master Race – Alfred Rosenberg & Nazi Ideology’ New York, New York: Dodd Mead & Company 1972 pg. 104
Despite all this, it’s still natural to ask why so many people become confused about this matter. Some will try to import German National Socialism anyway, usually as a kind of religion, and then end up devoting their lives to this German community organizing plan which has yet to take and hold even a single block in the US.
In part this is because many still misinterpret (or intentionally misrepresent) the National Socialist government’s prewar campaign against the Treaty of Versailles, which extended into each of the territories Germans claimed. Many non-Germans sources slyly protested that this was “foreign interference,” an exporting of National Socialism, but that wasn’t how most Germans or the National Socialists viewed the controversy.
Protests were also registered whenever any self-styled “NS group” arose in Europe or elsewhere, but those were not created or controlled by Germany.
Prior to the war the latter often caused public relation problems for the German government, and during the war they submitted to Germany, but at no time were they on the kind of equal footing that would have resulted if National Socialism really was being exported.
Our own movement’s ideology is not German or Italian, and our nation is linked by language mostly through Britain and Ireland as our doorways to Europe.
The most important part of our people’s cultural revival is what they work to create, as they declare the political unity and rights of a new people, not what they less effortlessly consume from their various and more competitive past heritages.
The cultural roots of our folk are from various sources, so we cannot afford to give a dominate role to any one creed of the past, but extract the best from all of them.
We reject a politics desperately hinged to revisionist history, but will strive to reassert what is true in history – warts and all.
Our movement does not possess an answer to every controversy of the past, as it is new and with the future, so it will only carry what is potentially useful from the past.
An Introduction to the article ‘Invisible Empires and Sacred Spaces.’
This series of questions and answers is relevant to an article that follows, so I’d like to share it with you as an introduction:
QUESTION: For those who don’t know where this is coming from, Mr. Barrett, can you relate your own Klan background?
ANSWER: My first contact with the Klan was in 1965 at Fort Gordon, an army base for advanced military training in Georgia, where one of Robert Shelton’s most able organizers was my platoon sergeant, but even that early on I sensed that the times had changed and so I held back from joining. Then in 1972 I decided to accept David Duke’s invitation to work at the Nationalist Party in New Orleans, where I served as his organizer and as one of about three advisors he referred to occasionally.
QUESTION: Yes, Duke mentions you and that group throughout a chapter in his autobiography ‘My Awakening.’ The Nationalist Party was a kind of precursor to his more traditional looking Klan, but without the robes and rituals, correct?
Answer: Yes, that’s about the best way to describe it.
QUESTION: And it was from there that Duke decided to set up the more elaborate Klan organization that is more vividly associated with his youth, right?
ANSWER: Yes, that’s correct. He was being encouraged to take on a more radical appearance by his main advisor and backer.
QUESTION: When did this transition in his plans come about?
ANSWER: That was just a few days after we had all gotten out of Parish Prison, another incident recounted in his book.
QUESTION: Yes, you shared a cell with Duke there. And so when you both got out and Duke informed you that he was going to take this direction of developing a more traditional looking Klan, what was your response to him?
ANSWER: I said that it conflicted with the assessment I had already made about how White society had evolved. Our people had not merely collapsed politically and culturally, but now required the kind of leadership and remedies that were also evolved enough to rouse them.
QUESTION: What did these cultural changes in the White community have to do with the Klan’s prospects?
ANSWER: It has everything to do with it. Whites today require leaders who have such qualities as military experience, education, an appealing image on television, and some distance from those who prostitute Klancraft tradition for settling personal scores, or who are addicted to them as a cultism separate from military veterans and the racial community.
QUESTION: How did Duke react to this description of the situation from you?
ANSWER: He said that he actually realized much the same thing, but as he was under some pressure to take the more traditional route anyway, he still asked how we could use elements of the plan I had drawn up.
QUESTION: Now we’re getting to my favorite part, as you’re talking about PLE Legionism in its earliest stages.
ANSWER: That’s correct. Duke spoke of his intention to take up Klan rituals, and I informed him that I had faith in a different way of gathering our people and wouldn’t be able to remain with him at that time.
Much to my surprise, however, he was still willing to ask me how the gist of the plan could be utilized, even though it wasn’t all sorted out even in my mind. And eventually I was able to come back into a more united effort with him, as I do today from Stormfront.
QUESTION: You departed from Duke and the Nationalist Party just days after this conversation, but eventually contributed to his election campaigns. But did you respond to that unexpected question before going?
ANSWER: I recognized that Duke was taking a more traditonal and regional approach, but as PLE is constructed so as to permit even portions of it to be applied, my reply was that it should be at least a new kind of Klan; in other words, a more highly evolved form of invisible empire.
QUESTION: Are you, then, the person who actually put him onto that?
ANSWER: I don’t think so, because he quickly responded by saying he was already planning to make it into a more evolved and relevant kind of klan.
QUESTION: Well, it’s still a fascinating moment in history. And I’m curious about what you would have preferred him to do, because based on what you’re saying about the pressure from others, he seems to have had it in him to get on the right road a lot sooner.
ANSWER: When Duke eventually left most of the traditional trappings of the Kan behind, and most conscious Whites see that was the correct thing to do, he focused on gaining the solid support of the community and its veteran legionnaires. And he certainly succeeded on both counts.
QUESTION: Does that mean that Duke left the Klan behind?
ANSWER: He certainly left any rootless Klan cultism behind, and exchanged it for the far more useful support of the White community and its veterans. That’s what the priority had always been to Nathan Bedford Forrest as well.
QUESTION: I’m beginning to grasp what this is all about for the first time, but does it mean abandoning all the old Klan traditions?
ANSWER: When Nathan Bedford Forrest closed his form of Klan, it was because of changed conditions. And while any Klan form that has become obsolete today should also be closed, that does not prevent us from raising up PLEs which thrive on being partly invisible.
Additionally, the cultural revival in a PLE should include popular reminders of Klan history for a wider audience; be those t-shirt images of films like ‘Birth of a Nation’ and ‘Gone With the Wind,’ or reprinted novels by Thomas Dixon.
QUESTION: And so what you’re saying is that we’re on the verge of seeing some sort of rebirth of the invisible community as an idea our people will respond to again, but this is within the context of the PLE’s cultural revival?
ANSWER: That’s correct, as each PLE serves as the vessel of that cultural revival; like the relationship of a launcher to a rocket.
QUESTION: Although the culture revival from PLEs and veteran legionism is widely supported by White Nationalists in cyberspace now, because they haven’t been constructed yet many of us can’t visualize this strategy.
ANSWER: The initial stage of any PLE must remain as invisible as the present Klan cults until the leases of each business core is signed, but even when operating normally it’s in everyone’s interest not to openly identify many of the residents and supportive visitors.
QUESTION: That reminds me of that scene in ‘Gone With the Wind’ when the men folk, all returned confederate veterans, went out at night and thrashed the heck out of the criminals who had set up their camp on the edge of town.
ANSWER: Yes, an important part of our culture revival is the claiming of any and every film that has even the slightest proWhite spin. And our people can’t just sit back and watch endless reruns of Griffith’s Birth of A Nation either.
This new kind of “invisible empire” must constantly reach Whites with its own films and many other forms of merchandise. And nearly everyone should at least try their hand at some artistic craft to generate lots of products.
These are to raise consciousness and establish an uncontrolled White Nationalist culture that spans all across the local living space.
QUESTION: Do you project that we’ll be selling Klan robes, Klan pocket knifes, and related books?
ANSWER: Every pro-White person visiting a PLE, pitching political ideas there, or setting up a business in its environment, will be free to sell whatever they want about the Klan, as it’s an important part of White history. And even those who want to sell books that are highly critical of the obsolete Klans and vigilantes holding us back should also be welcomed.
QUESTION: Pro-White people are divided on how to interpret Klan history, with British comrades especially amazed at how much controversy we tolerate here, but do you visualize the shops actually banning any books about the Klan?
ANSWER: Ideally we should see the world’s largest selection of pro-White books, and if some of those are critical about giving our communities over to vigilantes, or being dominated by bully’s, posers, or loose cannon cultists who have no military experience or community support, so be it. The real Klan is always something capable of being community supported, and anything less is merely a cultism barely existing at the bottom of history’s trashcan.
QUESTION: You’ve also said that any PLE would have a visible side, vessels for raising up an “Uncontrolled White Nationalist Culture” which will prompt all others to freely choose to depart the target area. Is that the only way for us to become a true ethnic community holding territory again?
ANSWER: Other Political/cultural/lifestyle communities usually go no further than that, but the legal helpers among us may also consider the option of establishing a lawfully registered zone for a PLE community long before we succeed in terraforming every square block of the obsolete type of White community.
In other words, just as zones are already established or proposed by federal, state, and local laws in order to protect business, ecological, and ethnic interests (such as the rights of American indians on reservations and at least one Japantown in San Francisco), the option may also assist our struggle.
Here is the first actual book to cover the mysteries of zoning. And although it’s about what goes on in California, it can still provide the general idea of how this works anywhere in the world. Or you can search for details on the Internet.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/customer-reviews/0923956050/sr=8-1/qid=1187877525/ref=cm_cr_dp_all_top/103-4095266-0639842?ie=UTF8&n=283155&s=books&qid=1187877525&sr=8-1#customerReviews” rel=”nofollow” target=”_blank” title=”Amazon.com: Reviews for Guide to California Planning: Books: William B. Fulton”>Amazon.com: Reviews for Guide to California Planning: Books: William B. Fulton
<b>Invisible Empires and Sacred Spaces</b>
A Euro-American community and its people has many sacred spaces besides just its churches. And throughout history it has been the custom of friendly outsiders to respect the hallowness of anything associated with a neighboring tribe’s beliefs, even when those things are invisible. This is why we must eventually require nonWhites not to invade the sacred spaces that sustain our race.
<b>All individuals have a changing distance of invisible space around them for various social situations in public, and maintain even a kind of stronghold of it when they are at home.</b>
As our social spaces are based upon Western traditions, concepts, and sciences, our desire and right to their integrity appears as a superstition or prejudice to nonwestern minds – and even to less informed members of our own race.
In African and and Chinese cultures that space can be much closer, so nonWhites and the government no longer show any sensitivity or respect about the sacred spaces within the White community, including schools, restaurants, or jobs.
<b>But we must reassert our right to all the institutions we inherited to maintain our race’s living space, especially the military veteran fraternal organizations, and the appropriate vessel for these is a PLE.</b>
As White Americans we know that means being militant, but we shouldn’t accept those who ask us to defend ourselves with traditions and methods that are obsolete, whether that’s an uncritical Klan or NS cult.
Veteran and cultural legionism has long been our true militant tradition, but it needs reviving in Pioneer Little Europe to gather us all in.
The President of the United States, for example. is also the Commander and Chief of the Armed Forces – though he certainly isn’t protecting our ethnic integrity.
And there exists a traditional preference among many people for a military veteran to hold that office, the highest leadership position in the world.
This is why so many candidates for other political offices will also appear in front of the military veteran groups; for those groups are all part of the <i>legionist tradition created to protect our ethnic community (as in race and culture).</i>
The political/cultural/lifestyle communities that are slowly eating up the OLD White community have gotten into these “ethnic organizations”; such as the American Legion, Forty & Eight, and Veterans of Foreign Wars.
And so one of the central tasks for us today is to REESTABLISH our posts within Pioneer Little Europe, and from there the fight will begin again
Our competitors have already done something similar; for example, there are Black, Asian, and even Gay militant posts within their political communities. These are legally chartered, and they have permission to invite in all supporting civilians.
Klancraft is a long tradition, but it is certainly not any “one true purist organization,” and has constantly evolved to fit social conditions since its first founding:
When Nathan Bedford Forest was leader, the organization was for military veterans.
But Forrest was right to eventually close that type of Klan in the interest of national unity.
Then there was a version of the Klan revived as a fraternal order much like the Masons.
That was fine too during the high tide of interest in fraternal orders and secret societies (1890s-1930s) but today even the Odd Fellows is dying for want of members.
In the 1950s the appeal of the Klan tradition temporarily revived again for a time during the fight for segregation, but as the “close proximity racial relationship” of traditional segregation began eroding in an age of mass transportation and population shifts, the Klan’s support also began eroding.
And it should not go unnoticed that the process went into critical mass shortly after a lady named Rosa Parks, a mixed race product of an obsolete system, decided that it made little sense to give up her seat on a local bus.
At present the free movement of the races, in many locations, actually provides greater social distances to the races anyway.
Eventually came David Duke’s National Party in 1972, followed by the emergence of his modern style Klan, then finally an absorption of Klan values without the uniform right into modern politics.
Today the Klan is only vitally represented in practical politics, rather than by any cultism of the past, and many believe that this is especially true of the partly invisible communties known as “Pioneer Little Europe.”
In the past there have been a bewildering number of names and labels for the inivisble empire, but any cultism about Klan trappings is quite inconsequential, as most Whites will support only what works.
And the opponents of Whites today already possess their own “invisible empires” in the form of “political/cultural/lifestyle communities.
Their new style communities are inclusive of everyone who offers to help them oppose Whites – no matter what authority or heritage their separate purist organizations claim – and Whites must adopt a counter-stategy to end the erosion of their own communities geographically, culturally, and physically.
<i>Anything less than this kind of effort to embrace all conscious Whites is not the “real Klan,” which was about heritage and proved its AUTHENTICITY and SOCIAL AUTHORITY by representing whatever White community it sprang from; both on a political and militant basis.</i>
In other words, without community support there is no authenticity or social authority for any self-styled Klan organization, as anything less becomes as hollow as a scarecrow in a field. Any truly conscious White does not support the floundering “Klan cults,” but promotes the community building that’s advocated in the PLE prospectus.
A PLE’s shops will, however, carry more books about the Klan than any other source; both the books which offer justifications for why it was revived in defiance of General Forrest’s command, and the books which are highly critical of those who were responsible for many atrocities unintended by its creators.
A concise explanation of those new conditions is expressed in the prospectus about PLE and Legionism, which advocates the creation of communities that are open to all proWhite spins. And the PLE’s defense tradition, veteran and cultural Legionism, is open to all proWhite militant veterans.
More inclusive than the more limited Southern Nationalist veterans group of Forrest’s era, and in the spirit of a wider White racial unity, Forrest himself would certainly have approved.
PLE Legionism is the modern face of semi-invisible community, and its also the American variant of postwar European Nationalism.
And what of the carnival like pranks of the old Klans, which actually served the purpose of serious social defense? That also lives on as the street theater which takes place in a PLE, legally destroying the existing public values, and gaining the living space that the conscious community has long needed for its continued existence.
<strong>The Pioneer Little Europe Prospectus – Part Six</strong> <hr size=”1″ style=”background-color: #d1d1e1; color: #d1d1e1;” /> <div id=”post_message_3667873″> <b>”The Age of Posing”</b>
From the PLE perspective, we are living in a culturally fallen time that would be best described as “The Age of Posing,” when hollow words and a superficial veneer of sincerity rule like a tyrant.
* It is common today to encounter people on the job who pretend to be our friends, but we know where they really stand if they’re addicted to using dissective criticism in an effort to humble, torment, or insult us.
* It is common in many churches today to enounter members who only go through the motions of their selected faith, while they really know very little if anything about it.
* It is common to encounter WNs today who attack our posts before even reading them.
* It is common to encounter people today who offer us beliefs, products, or services that we don’t need, or don’t want, or which don’t stand up to their associated claims
* It is common to encounter White youth who have so little culture, the survival tools of any race, that they adopt the fashions, mannerisms, actions, and values of Blacks. But it’s a disasterous state of mind, as even Blacks do not thrive with their especially proficient way of appearing authentic.
* It is common to encounter people who know practically nothing about their race’s history or geography.
* It is common to encounter people who place an enormous emphasis on personal appearance, their job, sex, entertainment, wine, or food, but who otherwise have little or nothing to say.
* It is common now to see movies with superfical interactions between the characters but a lot of emphasis on special effects, explosions, arousing sex scenes, and killing.
* It is common to find WNs who don’t grasp that today’s White communities are not actually true communities – and that we need an alternative type.
In this alternative Whites would maintain their territorial and cultural integrity just as all other races are free to do; so those who demand that Whites share their living space, when Asians or Blacks are not required to do so, are promoting a lie about what authentic community is – and our genocide.
Trying to raise up Whites who are only posing as comrades or a community, without waking them to something far better, would be a fool’s errand.
* It is common to encounter even White Nationalists today who don’t require results from their selected leaders or their political creeds (cultism).
* It is common to encounter WNs who seem content to entertain us endlessly, as highly isolated individuals in the Internet closet, with all the details of a great struggle and what they will do to punish their opponents.
But it’s only in their imagination, because gaining real power requires us to raise up Stormfronts of the Street in the real world; so these WNs in the closet tend to sound like the cowardly Lion in the Wizard of Oz
* It is common to encounter WNs who fail to see that there’s a big difference between conscious Whites and other Whites; so if you suggest forming a vanguard community of conscious Whites (a PLE) in order to terraform the Old White community many will still say “We don’t need to create White communities.”‘
* It is common, again even in White Nationalism, to encounter those who say they have taken up National Socialism or fascism, but who have actually rejected their own nation’s counterpart to those prewar populisms overseas; so they only became powerless cultsts.
And one must ask why the NS cultists are not mostly block organizers as Germay’s originals were, or why they are not aggressively trying to win over veterans, or why they are not even raising up an alternative community in a target area (i.e. Munich) <b>Mardi Gras for White People</b>
Many Whites who are familiar with the traditional Mardi Gras event in New Orleans will be surprised to learn how very important the wearing of masks has long been in human societies.
<a href=”http://www.mardigrasneworleans.com/” rel=”nofollow” target=”_blank”>Mardi Gras New Orleans 2012 | Mardi Gras in New Orleans</a>
Take for example what goes on with African-Americans in their daily interaction with us. Exhibit even the slightest signal that you’re feeling a bit guilty about the history or living conditions of African-Americans, and there’s no shortage among them of individuals who will quickly go into an impression of a long suffering victim still bleeding from the cuts inflicted by master’s whip
If there’s a White person revealing even the slightest discomfort about the AVERAGE economic difference between the races, or poverty, or slavery, or a politically incorrect remark, just watch a practiced performer go into action.
After writing this article I was fortunate enough to notice an extremely interesting book by an especially perceptive Black educator John McWhorter, who argues that his people should stop doing this to Whites:
Because Black Americans have obviously made so very much progress since the Civil Rights Act, to adopt victimhood as an identity, a black person, unlike for example, a Hutu refugee in Central Africa, must exaggerate the extent of his victimhood. The result is a Cult of Victimology, under which remnants of discrimination hold an obsessive, indignant fascination that allows only passing acknowledgment of any signs of progress.
And it will often not matter if such Black actors are very light skinned, wealthy, highly educated, or simply in a better job than the White person involved, because in their minds the show must go on!
The reason for this, as anyone can figure out, is that such performances have long become institutionalized as opportunities for a naturally invasive people (one long known for not observing the boundaries of others until firmly reproached) to make another political or social inroad.
This acting goes on among many other non-Whites as well, with the Jews being credited as the grand masters of masking (and being geniuses at denying it). In fact, many Whites today would swear up and down that Jews are simply an exotic variety of themselves.
Many Whites who have visited Stormfront’s “Advance Scout” forum, however, now recognize that we have a strategy for turning the tables and we call this PLE-Legionism. And one of our own tactics is the launching of a kind of guerrilla theater or “White Mardi Gras” to rule the streets of the PLE.
Whites in the Old White community traditionally flee whenever they see unusual behavior on the rise:
* The Irish and the Italians of San Francisco’s Castro District once suspected that a lot of homosexuals had moved in among them, but until the politically calculated kissing on the streets started, they often weren’t willing to run.
* In other cities the Chinese comprise the alien culture that seeks to terraform neighborhoods into political strongholds, and the live fish, dried snakes, and hanging ducks at the first market to open provides a show that most Whites want distance from.
This kind of repellent activity, when coordinated by enough participants, throws up a kind of peculiar wall. There are remarkably subtle barriers throughout the natural world, such as the surface tension on any pond that allows some insects and even lizards to “walk on the water.”
When this option is engaged in human society, it provides the modern “political/cultural/lifestyle community with its first line of defense and integrity.
A Pioneer Little Europe has its own cultural version of this tactic, and this is how you can make it work:
After you’ve moved into the general target area of a PLE, perhaps some stronghold long recognized as supportive of pro-White political candidates, try to identify any liberal who’s obstructing the community.
PLEs will attract all kinds of pro-White people who will enjoy meeting those liberals, though many of these supporters of ours are unstable or over the top because of an NS or Klan cult spin.
Let’s say you’re in a shop owned and operated by a liberal who says: “Look, there’s another one of those freaks in a strange uniform or costume, what do you think of it?”
At this point you need to assume your best poker face and say: “Freedom of expression is an important value in this community, my friend, so if you can’t handle it you should consider moving.” Be sure to look a bit outraged as well.
Additionally, you can tell this liberal that you’ve even had a few conversations with these cultists and that they actually make a lot of good points that the media generally does not allow into circulation.
Don’t drift onto any tangent about how the cultist groups have never actually attracted many women, how they attract too many sociopaths, homosexuals, how nearly anyone associated with them eventually drops out of political activity for good, or how cults fail to bring pro-White moderates and militants into common activities. Community improving messages should only be aired when there are friends listening. And this is a culture war!
In German there’s an old saying that’s appropriate to this: Mach dich gar nicht wissen – Make believe you don’t know.
Within the PLE target area, play only the stereotype expected while in front of any remaining liberal residents!
Now picture enough of us temporarily taking on the role of this person’s worst political nighmare. And if they can’t take the joke (And most won’t), when they see this happening throughout the neighborhood, many will decide to move.
It is important, however, that none of the liberals is ever told that they must get out, as PLE is about free choices within what’s lawful:
Yes, it’s true that some of the Whites who will arrive into our open society will prefer to take this to an extreme, but we can’t approve of anything illegal.
As with many of you, I’m a veteran at saying whatever will shock our opponents, and in my twenties I wore my own share of militant uniforms and robes with strange designs, so I’m not opposed to wearing anything that will help us to gain the foothold that our people have long needed.
Despite this, I believe that there are better options than strange costumes and saying the most outrageous things when advancing the cause in front of potential friends who are not hardened liberals.
Those who are especially interested in this last essay may like to request the following books by interlibrary loan:
McWhorter, John H ‘Losing the Race – Self Sabotage in Black America’ New York, New York: Simon and Schuster 2001 pg 2
Michael Kirby ‘Futurist Performance’ E.P. Dutton & Co. New York, New York 1971
O. M. Collective ‘The Organizer’s Manual’ (especially pages 72 – 76 for guerrilla theater) Boston, Mass: Bantam Books 1972
Eric Hoffer ‘The True Believer – Thoughts On the Nature of Mass Movements’ New York, New York: Harper & Row 1989
Carnegie, Dale ‘How To Win Friends & Influence People’ New York, New York: Pocket Books 1981
Recommended for further reading: <a href=”http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t138840/” target=”_blank”>Where R U On the PLE “Hate-O-Meter” ? – Stormfront</a>
—————————————————————————————— <b>PLE-Legionism and Your Personal Mental Freedom</b> Practice makes perfect in any endeavor, and just as many other perspectives have their mental exercises or attitudes for coping with various situations, so does PLE-Legionism.
Despite this, even when conscious White people reject the use of some or all of the following recommended attitudes during community building, they are still to be warmly invited to take up residence within the PLE target area.
<b>Emotional Detachment About the American Civil War and WW2:</b> As WNs are permitted to come into the PLE process without having to first compromise or abandon their existing beliefs about the past conflicts of White people, nor promise to conform to anyone else’s views even later, the practice of emotional detachment on these subjects is highly recommended while a community synthesis emerges from the PLE’s forums and culture revival.
<b>Claiming All of White History:</b> There will be many among us who will reject the tactic of claiming all of White history, as their reckoning will be that some of it is useful for advancing their particular purist view but that much is not useful and can just as well go down the memory hole. That approach will, for example, devalue even books about any Union solders who had proWhite motives; or devalue the books detailing the economic remedies of Franklin Roosevelt, despite the fact that his remedies were not only very popular but related to those advocated by persons still popular with many WNs. Any history that WNs do not put a claim on would be left to some other “representative of our interests” to interpret, like a captured cannon suddenly being turned around in the middle of a battle, but the purists who dare to claim all of our history and offer the most credible assessments will thrive.
<a href=”http://heritagetoday.us/euro/ple.html” rel=”nofollow” target=”_blank”>http://heritagetoday.us/euro/ple.html</a>
<b>Prioritizing What’s In Our Interests:</b> Just as prioritizing is a traditional part of any individual’s self-improvement program, it plays a key role in community building. PLEs invite in both the negotiators and the uncompromising, the peace makers and those of a militant disposition, but the priority is raising up and sustaining a community – not any premature decision about whose political remedies are the most practical.
<b>Recognizing Both the Initial Value of the Cultists & How They Divide Us:</b> At Western Destiny Books we used to sell the History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, which covers many controversies including Edward Gibbon’s personal views on the rise of Christianity, but it’s actually the background covered about Christianity’s origins that was the most useful. Christianity had to struggle up at a time when all kinds of cults ran rampant in the Roman Empire, far more than usual, and many social observers believe these increase during periods when Western civilization is exhausted.
If this insight is transferred over to the condition of the White Nationalist movement, we soon see that the situation is similar for us. Many thought that this dilemma would be solved by simply importing National Socialism from Germany, despite the fact that its creator is on record for advising against that, but the utter lack of success for NS in the US, despite the greatly collapsed condition of Whites, demonstrates he was right.
The Old White community continues to collapse into impotent cults, but when these are guided into the PLE target area their feral condition contributes to a “liberal flight” from our living space. As the various purists raise up the community, patiently including the cultists as well, everyone’s social skills will be greatly improved.
<a href=”http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t345789/sho…william+sargant” target=”_blank”>The Pioneer Little Europe Prospectus – Part Six</a>
<b>Choosing the Most Effective Level of Resistance To Opponents:</b> Although it’s a bit of an irony, sometimes less force is more effective when going up against opponents. A good example to some would be the process which led to the collapse of Communism. It did not occur during a mighty military invasion which assailed cities like Moscow and Stalingrad, but rather when the Marxists finally exhausted themselves after many indirect conflicts and economic competition with the West.
As a PLE keeps one foot in, and one foot outside system, its residents are more likely to expand their influence by employing the anti-communist tactics of a local Republican Party in the target area than a more militant group that advocates disrupting communist meetings near the PLE. As our residents will invite in many kinds of WN purists, with a competitive selection of remedies, the most effective in various conditions and circumstances will thrive.
<b>How To Break Out of NS Cultism</b> Those who suspect that they may have fallen into the ISOLATING pattern of NS cultism, and are having difficulty rejoining their family members and others in conscious COMMUNITY building, are advised to consider the Pioneer Little Europe exercises for recovering the tormented.
Sometimes the obsession takes a physical form, and its victims will find themselves actually compelled to thrust up an arm and shout “Heil Hitler” to their opponents, even though the real National Socialists reserved this greeting for friends.
Or the obsession can take the form of reading Mein Kampf in a weird way: A cultist may read Hitler’s explanation about the advantages of starting fresh, for example, but then he or she just blocks it out and says: “Why reinvent the wheel? Let’s simply substitue Whites wherever it says Germans and import it.”
When cultism is conditoned in it leads to automatic actions that are difficult to control, and many such sleepwalking victims begin to resemble Haitian zombies.
The polarized beliefs many Whites have about Hitler are not, contrary to what is constantly said by the Zionist media and modern day cultists, solely attributable to the propaganda of one side or the other.
Nor is it the first time it’s happened to Whites. In the 1890s, for example, it was commonplace even in the United States to encounter Napoleon cultism in the daily press. Today, however, people tend to see his acheivements and failures more realistically.
While it is true that the godlike image of Hitler was especially well sharpened by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, through the vivid impression creating influences of radio and film, Hitler’s opponents actually contribute much more to fuel the modern cult image.
The leading element of today’s propaganda is a description of the devil incarnate, not a person with human strengths and weaknesses who was once easily overlooked in a crowd.
The new image is attributable to opponents at least swallowing part of what Goebbels offered, or not fighting the superman impression, then adding a dark spin.
And picking up the same propaganda tool as Joseph Goebbels, which was usually a highly selective criteria for which images and messages would be shown or held back, Hitler’s opponents inadvertently managed to promote a dysfunctional cultism that further undermined the White community and culture.
Hitler cultism in that form, however, became so sinister that it was separated from its original purposes, which was to unite, inspire, and lead people into actions intended to benefit them. It was not to create a cult separated from any normality.
Today’s Hitler cultism is a mixed creation offered by two separate camps that are separated from the White community, the Zionists and the cultists who converted or snapped from Zionist propaganda.
Shaking off the cultism, however, is not an easy matter, as it’s been fueled by both sides since the beginning. But once you do shake it off, you’ll be able to safely navigate even through your favorite cult books without drawing conclusions that will interfere with your pro-White activisim and social ties.
Those who suspect that they have been conditioned into cultism, a feeling which arises when we find our actions out of step with the people important to us, are advised to use this method for gaining their freedom.
Those who read and think more extensively than other people tend to be the most deeply conditioned, and will commit themselves to cultism without seeing any progress for incredibly long periods of time.
If you even suspect you are in this category, try the following more cerebral exercises for straightening yourself out:
1) Begin with a study of conditioned reflexes, which began as a more formal science under Ivan Pavlov, but chose a more modern and popular exposition to grasp the subject quickly.
Among the recommended books are “Battle for the Mind” by William Sargant, which was Dr. William Pierce’s favorite book in English, and the one he considered in 1972 to be his secret weapon.
There’s also ‘Snapping’ by Flo Conway & Jim Siegelman, and even the film ‘Ticket to Heaven.’
2) Examine also any books or films available on how people such as Roosevelt, Hitler, Churchill, and Stalin used the media to promote their images. There’s one in print right now called the Hitler Myth, and books have been published which document how Roosevelt concealed his inability to walk unassisted.
Pay particular attention to how the public reacted to the first radio programs as if gods were talking to them, and read about the Orson Welles radio program that caused many Americans to believe that they were being invaded from Mars
3) Obtain the little pamphlet “The True Believer” by Eric Hoffer the San Francisco longshoreman. Hoffer took cult criticism to such an extreme that he actually neglected to acknowledge how cultism, in a more sublimated, controlled, and moderate level, is a natural part of Western culture.
This peculiar book was selling at the George Lincoln Rockwell book shop in 1970, shortly before the NSWPP lost most of its leaders, and it had a lot to do with key people reassessing themselves
4) Sir Oswald Mosley <i>was one of the few major figures of national socialism and fascism to survive WW2 and make a postwar assessment of “the movement” in his autobiography, My Life. This includes his economic ideas, which were greatly influenced by his prewar friend Franklin Roosevelt.</i>
Find our why he said that the old nationalisms are obsolete, including fascism and national socialism, and why he felt Hitler had failed in some important ways, as his perspective is leaps and bounds ahead of those further down the ranks.
Or read Diana Mitford Mosley’s books, as no one ever said she abandoned the cause or failed to acknowledge Hitler’s accomplishments, to see what she observed of Hitler while in his inner social circle prior to the war.
5) Contact whoever gets you back on track, and find out how you can help others by promoting PLE-Legionism.
6) Admit to your family that you were actually a cultist – and be prepared to laugh along with them. Eventually the most loving of them – when they feel it’s safe to do so – will actually start telling you how Hitler and National Socialism had many positive points.
They too will come to realize that he is a fascinating part of the White race’s extraordinary adventure, but while this happens, put your emphasis on restoring your connections with them, as historical controversies will require time and patience to sort out on a PLE’s forums.
7) Keep reminding yourself about all the times you put aside your personal views and creativity, or made sacrifices of time, labor, and energy to “promote the movement.” Keep reminding yourself about how the race really got little or NOTHING out of your sacrifices. And it’s not a heresy or sin to take command now of your life and come out of the political closet.
8) Have patience as you CULTURALLY CONDITION yourself back to freedom of thought. It’s an American thing, so many people will want you to succeed.
9) The process is similar to withdrawing from cigarettes, so forgive yourself if you occasionally revert to obsessing about Hitler and NS. After a long enough cold turkey from it, and having the PLE perspective to raise yourself back up, you’ll even be able to read Mein Kampf with the detachment of a West Point graduate. And there’s a lot to learn from that book.
As PLEs are intended to lead to a higher form of our Western society, the reformation of ourselves into a healthy ethnic group, here’s a quote from Meister Eckhart, who studied both pagan and Christian sources for an article about detachment in his own time:
<i>Now, God’s own natural place is unity and purity, and that comes from detachment.</i>
Many may even be interested in a complete study of detachment by Julius Evola:
<i>In this respect we can, properly speaking, talk of a technique that has, in common with modern scientific achievements, the charateristics of objectivity and impersonality</i>
10) Check out the many potential friends who are already promoting freedom of thought, camaraderie, community, and even veteran and cultural legionism within PLE, because together we become stronger pro-White advocates.
A Pioneer/Little Europe is a generic term for any local community where Whites live in close proximity to businesses which offer cultural facilities and services, most of whom openly support their political revival.
More advanced than the old Little Europes and White communities, Pioneer Little Europes are based on a study of the organizing principles shared among the more modern political communities that continue to dismember Whites geographically, culturally, and politically.
In Cyberspace the PLE community includes all independent supporters of building a concentrated White community of the conscious, whether within or unaligned to other proWhite organizations. Ref: O’Donohue, John (Foreward) <i>Meister Eckhart – Selections from his essential writings</i> San Francisco: Harper Collins 2005
Ref: Rosenberg, Alfred <i>The Myth of the Twentieth Century</i> Newport Beach, California: Noontide Press 1993
Ref: Evola, Julius <i>The Doctrine of Awakening – The Attainment of Self-Mastery According To The Earliest Buddhist Texts</i> Rochester, Vermont: Innner Traditions 1995 One of the distinctions between PLE activists and many others, thus far, is that they recognize that the <i>Old</i> White community’s cultural dynamics are obsolete.
PLE activists see that the <i>Old</i> White community’s culture endured a lot of stresses but eventually snapped and lost its bearings.
If we take an even longer view, examining an event like this in the context of Western history, we can also see that this is when cults begin to emerge.
The process is not all that different from when a tree falls in the forest, as it provides an opportunity for all kinds of creatures to take up residence in its disintegrating environment. Scientists refer to the process as <i>bio-degradation.</i>
The <i>Old</i> White community became very much like a tree which fell in the forest, for its lack of vitality allows Jewish Supremacists and many other competitors to prey on it.
Another interesting aspect to the <i>Old</i> White community’s cultural crisis is the way there are symptoms exhibited on an individual basis as well.
Most of the victims are in mainstream society, such as those who merely sound pro-White (or racist) but who actually treat their fellow White workers or neighbors in a disfunctional way.
And because many otherwise intelligent WNs also fail to properly assess the <i>Old</i> White community’s true condition, and remain caught up in it, the political solutions they propose about raising up the <i>Old</i> White community fall on culturally deaf ears.
Often addicted to certain behaviors or cultisms, there’s no shortage of Whites who believe that they somehow can and deserve to come to power without even moving from self-centeredness to camaraderie, or practicing this on a small scale in a new society.
A reliable rule of thumb about cults is this: If a mentor brings about changes in the beliefs of his followers through the calculated use of stressors that cause an emotional breakdown, or intentionally “bloods the troops,” there’s reason to suspect that it’s brainwashing.
On the other hand, if the transformation of a person’s beliefs emerges out of a Western cultural or religious revival, the gentler process is better able to retain moral legitimacy.
Many cultists, however, believe that everything would be allright if only others would get on board and accept the same beliefs and habits that have long locked them into social impotence.
Question: Are there any known drugs which have been associated with treating people who suffer from cultism, or who have been through any other type of trauma, such as violence or rape?
Answer: Yes, the drug MDMA, or what’s commonly called Ecstasy, is being using in cutting edge therapies to help such people. Decades ago it was initially banned outright as “having no redeeming social purpose,” despite a huge section of professionals who protested vigorously that it was a miracle drug being unnecessarily discredited because of the public’s misuse. In fact, Ecstasy is encountered in the political/cultural/lifestyle communities of others more frequently than either cigarettes, beer, or candy. Laws were passed in an effort to battle the abuse, then highly prejudiced safety tests simply left it in the hands of those who ignored the law.
But now, according to a recent issue of Discovery magazine and daily newspapers, Ecstasy is getting a fresh look, with a limited number of doctors being permitted to prescribe it again, as low or half doses under the supervision of trained professionals are helping war veterans to overcome post-traumatic syndrome.
And unknown to the general public, many psychiatrists, psychologists, and endocrinologists were secretly referring their patients to illegal drug dealers for decades anyway; especially if they encountered working class patients who couldn’t afford the high costs of therapy and its legal drugs. These patients, many of whom suffer because of accidents, rapes, assaults, post traumatic syndrome, cults, and endocrine malfunctions, shouldn’t be so cruelly ignored.
For additional reading after this article I’ll recommend this book: Saunders, Nicholas & Doblin, Rick ‘Ecstasy – Dance, Trance, And Transformation’ Oakland, California: Quick American Archives, 1996
Terra-forming the Old White community, and even the ways of many fellow WNs, is the task ahead. And the following suggested study list offers immense value for protecting or recovering the minds of White people as part of the PLE’s contemporary approach to culture revival:
<b>* Flo Conway & Jim Siegelman ‘Snapping – America’s Epidemic of Sudden Personality Change.’ New York, New York: Stillpoint Press Inc. 1995 This may be the leading book ever written on the mechanics of cult thinking.
* Langone Ph. D, Michael [editor] ‘Recovery From Cults – Help for Victims of Psychological and Spiritual Abuse’ New York, New York: American Family Foundation 1993
* Duke, David ‘My Awakening’ Covington, Louisiana: Free Speech Press 1998 The chapter detailing Jewish Supremacism in the media is especially useful.
* Briggs, Dorthy Corkville ‘Your Child’s Self Esteem’ New York, New York: Bantam, Doubleday, Dell 1967 This is a mainstream book, but it covers in remarkable detail the importance of children developing a strong identity.
* Founding Fathers ‘The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States.’ Washington DC: Cato Institute 2002 As the <i>Old</i> White community disintegrates, even many Whites foolishly disparage this venerable White ethnic document instead of reclaiming it.
* Maltz, Maxwell ‘Psycho-Cybernetics – A New Way to Get More Living Out of Life’ New York, New York: Prentice Hall 1960 This source may also interest many people, as it was being read by James Earl Ray just shortly before the assassination of Martin Luther King. And no, I don’t know if it was one of Raul’s recommendations.</b>
<b>PLE & The Yin and Yang</b>
Long ago I remember a teacher pointing out Europe’s very peculiar relationship with Asia (i.e Eurasia). And he provided a list of things that were in the hands of the Chinese; including the compass, maps, astronomy, and black powder.
He also pointed out that, despite Chinese ingenuity, it was actually the Europeans who took all those marvels to the highest level by coordinating them for influencing much of the world.
This was reinforced again one day when I encountered the late Dr. William Pierce, the militant, quietly studying a paperback-book titled ‘East & West,’ about a see-sawing of power that continues to this day.
I also found an old book titled ‘The Passing of the Great Race’ by Madison Grant, a physical anthropologist in the US, and was startled to see that, according to his charts, that there had once been a thick belt of Europeans living not only all the way across China but right into the north part of Japan. And the latter, a primitive type of Caucasian known as the Ainu, are still living there.
Eventually I was researching community organizing plans prior to working on the PLE prospectus (a Pioneer Little Europe is a proposed Stormfront of the street), and a similar thing happened again. Chinese influence has quite a high profile in that field too, where they’ve contributed the concept of “The Yin & yang,” which is about the balance of all opposite things in this world.
<b>What’s in general use is a Westernized interpretation, but the idea appears not only in the medicine and science of ancient Greece – which itself had Asian origins – but in modern freemasonry. In the PLE prospectus the term “cultural legioning” (or cultural gathering) is coined for those who prefer a more populist tag for any of our own speculations about the phenomena.</b>
From the PLE perspective we say that Western Civilization is balanced between what’s peaceful and what’s militant. And the following is to assist our activists in influencing the opposites serving them.
* In PLE organizing we say that those who participant in raising up the new model White community, whatever their personal pro-White spin initially, will continue to come together ideologically because of the heat from within and the heat from without. A true community is more than the fixed program of some ideal party, it is a process affected by all those who support it and even those outside who will oppose it.
* PLE’s residents will generally be conscious that they do not possess a de jure right to community integrity as most Asians enjoy, nor a de jure right to ethnic purity as many American Indians enjoy, as Whites are truly second class citizens under the existing laws of the United States. But in forming a conscious community – one partly visible and partly invisible for their protection – they offer a defacto community for bringing the authorities to their senses. And then “desuetude” is when such de facto practices are eventually accepted by law.
* From the PLE perspective we see two highly contrasting types of race advocates throughout history: First there are those who would frugally conserve the White race’s genetic inheritance, such as David Star Jordan, Jack London, and civil war General George B. McClellan.
McClellan, and others such as the less race oriented General George H. Thomas, were notorius for being exceptionally slow to move their troops out to the battlefield. But they were thinking of their men’s preparedness and safety, and Thomas was the only American civil war general who ever managed to destroy two entire confederate armies. It’s not widely known, as Thomas passed away before publishing an autobiography.
Then there are those who are inclined to generously expend people in conflicts, such as Franklin Roosevelt, Lyndon Johnson, General George Custer, Robert E. Lee, and especially Adolf Hitler. In the open streets of a PLE we’ll encounter both types of advocates, but it’s a recommendation that our supporters realistically accept that the White race is already in a dangerous condition of severe exhaustion and needs to take advantage of every diplomatic option.
* A PLE, as it is in line with Western traditon, always keeps a militant potential within. Most normal people have a preference for peace and safety, but we still embrace both our negotiators and militant defenders. Various social conditions are what prompt Whites into choosing an appropriate response, but they are not likely to make a sober or productive choice in a condition of non-community, isolated egos, or within a stagnant cultism.
* A PLE places one big foot into the system, as that is the best defense from those who would try to stereotype and crush us. But a PLE also keeps one foot out of the system, where a spontaneous militant protest can still arise when the system does not work for us.
* A PLE’s residents value both those who are stronger financially and those who are weaker financially; as the former can much more quickly seize the target area, being unhindered by property; but then it will require the latter, the better off, to actually put down the kinds of roots that will be much harder for our opponents to pull up.
* A PLE recognizes that the values of the community organizer and the values of the community defender will sometimes clash, as they represent different subcultures of civility for different situations and should not be imposed upon one another.
* A PLE will gather those who believe that a radically enlarged birth rate is the answer to the explosive birth rate of third world immigrants, but it will also gather those who use the long traditional White custom of only breeding for the higherst quality and respecting the rights of those do not believe their lives are suitable for children at all.
* A PLE will gather those who take the positon that a White community can employ tactics to float peacefully and safely within a sea of others, but it will also gather those who believe that a more competive approach is necessary for survival.
* A PLE will gather those who campaign for more fences and patrolling along the Mexican border, but it will also gather those who place an emphasis on diplomatic and economic solutions which are mutually beneficial.
* A PLE embraces both the givers and self-servers of economic theory, as both types have traditionally performed miracles at various times for communities throughout history.
* A PLE’s residents value the young and the old; because the young tend to have the energy to do the greatest things, while the old are often the tribe’s best counselors.
* A PLE is about Western Civilization, which has both Christian and pagan elements; it is not a plot to smother either side of a very important long term dialogue.
* A PLE embraces the WNs who want little or nothing to do with other races, but it also embraces the WNs who see a need to interact with all the rest of the world.
* A PLE attracts those who already know or sense that influence comes from conscious communities, instead of isolated individuals, but it’s also a place for an ongoing dialogue. As such, others will voluntarily step away from this living space which is our place to work out our business.
* A PLE embraces those who belong to some more tightly wound purist spin, but it also embraces those who are happier identifying with the PLE itself.
* A PLE embraces those who want to pitch some perfect political or religious truth, and it embraces those who’ve come seeking some political or religious truth.
* A PLE is about men and women exploring what is in the interest of both; sometimes working together but at other times sorting out matters just among their own sex.
* A PLE is initially based on a prospectus, but that’s not something written in stone, and is more like a computer program subject to the revisions of its participants.
Anyone interested in the military application of the Yin & Yang principle will find a fascinating example from the Korean war, when China suddenly entered the fight in October of 1950 and badly mauled two American armies near the Yalu River. When the Chinese then suddenly withdrew, General Douglas MacArthur presumed that they were as badly mauled as his own forces.
What was really going on, however, is that the Chinese had sized him up as being quite an arrogant person, and a typical Western “Yang man” without flexibility; so the withdrawal was a baiting maneuver to draw his UN forces into terrain suitable for another ambush. MacArthur’s forces advanced and were badly mauled again.
Another interesting example occurred in 1972, but on a diplomatic level, when President Richard Nixon surprised the world by going to Red China to offer them peaceful trade. This did not fit what anyone expected, as he had been one of the leading anti-communist figures for decades, but he got what he came for. Nixon clearly knew how to play this game too.
Appendix
The following list of glossary terms is useful for studying PLE-Legionism, and for explaining it quickly to others. I have made a deliberate effort to avoid anything that distracts from actually implementing the plan. <b>Populists:</b> This term has been applied in many ways during America’s populist or third way tradition: including the People’s Party at the turn of the century; the competing programs of Townsend, Roosevelt and some of his organizers, including Coughlin, Long, and even Joseph Kennedy (In his personal business Kennedy was a predator, but he had exactly the right qualifications for leading Roosevelt’s S.E.C to reform the NY Stock Exchange after the depression); the campaigns of Pat Buchanan and David Duke; those who advocate raising up new model White communities (i.e. Stormfronts of the street or PLEs); and even such overseas counterparts as fascism, National Socialism, Peronism, postwar Mosley Europeanism. In fact, even the creed of George Lincoln Rockwell, as it was a combination of American and German populism.
<b>National Socialism:</b> Although usually associated with Germany’s NSDAP between the 1920s and 1945, from the PLE perspective we point out that this idea had and still has native counterparts internationally, and that the most successful in America have been somewhat more democratic or only temporarily restrictive. In addition, in Europe and the United States social conditions have actually evolved from nationalism to Europeanisn.
<strong>Pseudo-National Socialist: </strong>This is a person who attempts to wholly transplant Germany’s National Socialism in another nation but neglects the daily raising up of a new local model of the White community; or as the real National Socialists referred to it, a “Volkgemeinschaft.”
<b>The Invisible Community Or Empire:</b> Most political communities have a percentage of hidden supporters, and it’s also a fine old Southern tradition with Scotch roots that the PLE will restore with a modern efficiency.
<strong>Pseudo-Klansman: </strong>A person who – in clinging to the type of klan associated in the public’s mind with close-proximity segregation – offers an obsolete stereotype disconnected from any White community.
<b>Walter W. Waters</b> During the summer of 1932, which was at the height of the Great Depression, a totally unknown WW! veteran by the name of Walter W. Waters – wearing a paramilitary uniform, jackboots, and a bow tie – led 45,000 veterans into Washington D.C. This group was called the Bonus Expedionary Force (or BEF), and Waters was elected to lead it as their “Commander.” Its members began with a demand for a promised government bonus, and appeared to develop a more revolutionary mindset while protesting, but they were physically dispersed by presidential order and troops under General Douglas MacArthur. There was also a remarkably effective media blackout of this national crisis, but until Franklin Roosevelt usurped this movement with his own third way remedies, its leaders advocated the formation of “grass-roots legionnaire communities” for a new type of White community.
<b>Cultural Legionism / Cultural Gathering:</b> A subtle militancy exists within Western culture, is raised up just as automatically wherever conscious Whites concentrate themselves as an uncontrolled culture, but which also needs to be organized and flexed by a grass-roots legion post open to all supporting WNs.
<strong>Cultural Revival:</strong> Activities which create and install the “cultural dynamics” of the new White community.
<b>Grass-roots Legionnaire:</b> A military veteran supporting a post within the PLE target area because it serves as the only official “militant tradition” of a PLE, whatever his or her more personal pro-White spin.
<strong>Uncontrolled White Nationalist Culture (or UCWNC): </strong>Wherever White Nationalists form an open community in the most ideal urban and rural strongholds, in a large enough numbers, the opponents of White Nationalists will voluntarily abandon the living space; much as others avoid Chinatowns and gaytowns. As such, it’s the proper way to use one’s culture for survival
<b>Vessel of Revival:</b> A Pioneer Little Europe is created to serve as the vessel, forum, brain, and center of cultural revival for the entire White community.
<b>Militant Protestors</b> There is no method employed to turn the militants of White Nationalism away from the public streets of the target area, but they are asked to restrict their activities to what is either moral or legal, because if and when the community is physically attacked they become its vanguard defenders.
<b>Plege to the Flag & Its salute</b> There has been a long reign of confusion associated with the origins of both the pledge to the flag and its associated salute because two men actually worked together to make it a public success; however, it’s generally safe to credit Francis Bellamy with every one of the original words in the Pledge to the Flag – and then the physical gestures to accompany it were conceived by his boss, James Upham. The originals went like this:
<i>At a signal from the Principal the pupils, in ordered ranks, hands to the side, face the Flag. Another signal is given; every pupil gives the flag the military salute — right hand lifted, palm downward, to a line with the forehead and close to it. Standing thus, all repeat together, slowly, “I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands; one Nation indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all.” At the words, “to my Flag,” the right hand is extended gracefully, <i>palm upward,</i> toward the Flag, and remains in this gesture till the end of the affirmation; whereupon all hands immediately drop to the side.
– quoted from The Youth’s Companion, 65 (1892): 446–447.</i>
This ceremony was intended to be part of an ongoing campaign to promote patriotism in the public schools. It was also a special reminder of Columbus Day, and as Rome, New York was Bellamy’s home town, it’s possible that the gesture also recalled Rome’s contribution to Western Civilization.
Because similar salutes were employed <i>decades later</i> by the Italian fascists and German national socialists – for many more political occasions and gained an especially high profile during wartime – the “Bellamy salute” was replaced in the United States in 1942 with a different gesture for pledging the flag which involved placing the hand over the heart without raising the arm at all.
Remarkably, even today’s historical experts are unable to determine which crisis manager within the US government actually brought about the change in 1942 because of wartime secrecy (Most Americans were also kept unaware that Roosevelt couldn’t walk), as a revised history was created.
Despite this, variations on the roman salute – including left or right arm extended – remain popular with many young and high-spirited White militants who utilize it while resisting the ongoing campaign of genocide against the White community.
<b>People’s Party:</b> This was the most visible vehicle of turn of the century populism, but when its primary issue was eventually taken up by William Jennings Bryan for his Democratic presidential campaign, which he lost just before more prosperous times, the party was badly derailed and its issues were eventually co-opted by many others.
It was also observed that this not only contributed to financial depressions but left only the rich with the ability to easily endure the effects of the malfunction. Today it’s widely accepted that the populists were absolutely right and the Federal Reserve System routinely uses some of their key economic ideas. <b>Volksgemeinschaft:</b> Hitler Germany’s NSDAP rejected the OLD type of White community, which was called “The Gesellschaft,” and it raised up an ALTERNATIVE type of White community called the ‘Volksgemeinschaft.” As recorded in Mein Kampf, the first target area for this was Munich, which provided the model for terraformng all the rest of Germany’s old model White communities.
This is also why the largest step in the NSDAP’s leadership pyramid was comprised solely of community block organizers. Advocates of importing National Socialism, who offer no more than a cult memory of the NSDAP, do not actually use its community organizing principles; nor do these appoint block organizers, generally remaining in the political closet and away from White people except for occasional demonstrations.
<b>Equal Rights for All, Special Privileges for None: </b>is a slogan which was employed by the populists of the turn of the century, then later by David Duke’s political campaigns. And while many observers still maintain that Whites actually have equal rights, it’s only White communities that are targeted by invasive laws which permit all outsiders to inhabit their ethnic institutions and living spaces. This is an ongoing genocide process on many levels.
<b>Cultural Tension:</b> Dragonflies and even Central America’s “Jesus Christ lizard” can walk on water due to the existence of something called surface tension, and various types of political/cultural/lifestyle communities legally keep themselves separate from all others by displaying their values in such high profile that those others voluntarily and legally avoid their living spaces.
The existing type of White community lacks this particular quality, but a PLE restores it. We refer to this as ‘The Uncontrolled White Nationalist Culture.’
<b>Unaligned PLE Residents:</b> Many conscious Whites will live within the PLE without formally supporting any particular purist organizations, some because they have not found the ideal purist one yet, and others who will adopt the “open White community and its uncontrolled WN culture” as an ideal.
<b>Stereotype:</b> Many pro-White people do not fit the obsolete stereotypes which are promoted by our opponents. These political minorities comprise a kind of “loyal opposition” on many issues, and they need to be made especially welcome in any PLE because of the way they confound our opponents.
<b>”Ideal Racial Sub-Types”:</b> Within a PLE target area various types of purists will offer their plans for maintaining the race’s integrity, but the broader PLE community is actually a political engine and not necessarily a gene pool of ideal racial subtypes.”
<strong>Ethnic group: </strong>When we wish to avoid being interpreted as racial materialists, or those berift of cultural survival tools, this word can be used in PLE organizng because it combines both concepts.
<b>Balance of Power:</b> Real communities accept the checks and balances of this game within that part of the eco-system which human races inhabit, and they establish diplomatic progress before any others outflank them. Every major conflict waged by Whites in North America, for example, has been waged with the assistance of non-White allies.
<b>Dissective Criticism:</b> As the OLD White community unravels, the habit of pure dissective criticism replaces civility. And this is most evident in the lack of restraint which cultists exhibit when they’re posting on-line and from the isolation of the political closet.
<b>Technology & Cultural Integrity:</b> One of the main tasks of the PLE’s cultural revival is to synthesize these two concerns. On the net Stormfront’s influence being engaged on behalf of all White people serves as the leading example.
<b>Please and Thank You:</b> These are social and business expressions that will be associated with the PLE’s cultural revival. Despite that, like the civility of the early television gunslinger Paladin, it will not be a sign of weakness.
<b>Mardi Gras for White People:</b> A real life street show where obsolete racist stereotypes (long associated with individuals who were without a functioning ethnic community and who aquired feral behaviors) will run rampant and cause enough move-outs to result in living space.
<b>The Kitchen:</b> The influences inside a PLE, and pressures from outside, will create a “heat in the kitchen” that will constantly bring us closer.
<b>Chinatown:</b> An ethnic community which maintains itself by raising up a culture strong enough to displace all outsiders, and uses its languages and solidarity to confound those who would seek invasive property rights or cultural control within its boundaries.
<b>Marxism:</b> Although accommodated to a certain extent by early populists who were angry about intolerable social conditions and the abuses of the wealthy, the contemporary face of Marxism now tends to offer the entire White community as an oppressor class (including its working class, such as happened in Northern Ireland) and actively campaigns for the “rights” of intrusive nonWhites.
<b>Taking the Streets:</b> Vital political movements control their streets, holding everything from political demonstrations to block parties on them.
<b>Battle for the Mind:</b> This especially valuable and highly readable book by Britain’s William Sargant explains how anyone can be converted to a belief system through a process of conditioning (brainwashing).
According to the former secretary of the late Dr. William Pierce (Earl, for whom the Turner Diaries was named), it was also the second most valued book in Pierce’s library, and he only valued Mein Kampf more highly.
Pierce saw in this highly unusual work a tool for converting Whites to a rigidly defined group, but for others it’s since become a welcomed guide for anyone seeking their personal freedom and who’s determined to launch the dynamics of authentic community in the next form of Western Civilization.
<b>Pioneers:</b> Those who move to an area that’s targeted for development as a new type of White community that’s conscious of its best interests.
<strong>Uncontrolled White Nationalist Culture: </strong>A PLE, because of its concentration of enthusiastic supporters, will exude an uncontrolled culture that outsiders will voluntarily avoid; much as straight Whites avoid gay areas, or why outsiders accommodate the expanding space of any Chinatown.
<b>Conscious Whites:</b> This refer to the Whites who are generally conscious of their best interests, though even the best among them are merely semi-conscious until immersed in the cultural revival.
<b>Cultural Revival:</b> PLE activities that concentrate and promote the cultural and political clout of conscious Whites.
<b>Peaceful Negotiation:</b> A PLE is a community and a defense tradition (Western civilization & grassroots legionism), and not a political closet, but its residents will use this value within the target area to insure the safety of all the families participating.
<b>PLE Economics:</b> A PLE maintains a core of shops engaged in free enterprise, sustains an ‘Uncontrolled White Nationalist Culture,’ and has idealists in the customer base who advocate for every imaginable social improvement proposal.
<strong>Close-Proximity Segregation System: </strong>This is a coined expression to hightlight the distinction between segregation itself and the obsolete close-promity segregation system of the deep South, which today’s pro-White leaders generally do not believe was race-sustaining enough.
<b>Over the Top:</b> Various impotent cultisms and an undisciplined militancy which arose out of frustration is all that keeps many WNs from being visible and having community support.
<b>Revisionists:</b> PLE residents do not simply swallow any revisionist’s views, but will be offering the safest forums for an ongoing and more high profile debate.
<b>”Open Community” :</b> Unlike a compound, a PLE is actually an open community and ethnic group (as in race and culture), but it still repels its opponents legally and voluntarily by raising up an ‘Uncontrolled White Nationalist Culture.’
<b>Boycott:</b> When we encounter a business in our target area which is obviously anti-White, we will launch and maintain an effective boycott for the first time.
<b>Relocation:</b> The PLE perspective applies to any area where Whites presently live; but it also accommodates the creation of strongholds and even purist preferences about Idaho and the northwest.
<b>Political Engine:</b> A PLE serves as a raw engine of support for WN interests, a Stormfront of the street, and it is not any particular purist spin within unless its residents eventually decide otherwise.
<b>Riot:</b> Many political/cultural/lifestyle communities (strongholds)experience an occasional riot when they feel infringed upon, but the huge foot we’ll be placing in the local system is actually intended to quietly and legally deliver up the lost community rights of Whites.
<b>Legal Liability:</b> As with the Old form of White community, a PLE avails itself of the freedoms of Western Civilization and leaves no specific person or organization legally responsible for the community’s actions in the manner that cults do; but rather an arrangement of confused liability. This will occur within any given target area because the constant criss-crossing of WNs with so many different spins will confound their opponents. ———————————-Bibliography—————————————-
<b>Duke, David ‘My Awakening – A Path To Racial Understanding’ Covington, LA Free Speech Press 1998</b> David Duke campaigned with the slogan “Equal Rights For All — Special Privileges For None.” It’s a populist slogan more than a century old. And as no one has ever gotten as far as Duke in both explaining and representing the interests of the White race in modern America, buy this book for sure. Also read the chapter titled “Belly of the Beast,” as he’s generously mentioned me, PLE’s author.
<b>Kazin, Michael ‘The Populist Persuasion – An American History Ithaca, New York: Basic Books/Harper Collins 1995</b> This is quite an extensive survey of populist movements and personalities. And unlike many other authors, Kazin includes Charles Coughlin, George Wallace, David Duke and many others who have projected racial views within populism.
<b>Dighe, Ranjit S. ‘The Historian’s Wizard of Oz – Reading L. Frank Baum’s Classic as a Political and Monetary Allegory’ Westport, Connecticut: Praeger 2002</b> Many people believe that Frank Baum filled his classic book with secret symbolisms about populism (i.e. The racialist Mary Leese of Kansas becomes Dorthy) And although most authorities appear to discount the theory, an increasing number of economics teachers are employing the Wizard of Oz anyway as a colorful introduction to the dryer subject of populism. Ranjit’s book explains how this is done.
<b>Ellis, Richard J. ‘To The Flag – The Unlikely History of the Pledge Of Alligiance.'</b> Lawrence, Kansa: University Press of Kansas 2005 The author takes a neutral postion on anything that would be deemed politically controversial, including the racial orientation of the man who created the pledge and its salute, Francis Bellamy, but the entire story is there.
<b>Lindbergh, Charles ‘Autobiography of Values’ New York, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovisch Publishers 1976-92</b> There are many Lindbergh books but this one will dispel the myth that he was a “Nazi.”
<b>Payne, Stanley G. ‘A History of Fascism 1914-1945’ </b>Madison, Wisconsin The Univ. of Wisconsin Press 1995 An encyclopedic survey of fascist movements which didn’t neglect Roosevelt’s connection to Mussolini.
<b>Beschloss, Michael R. ‘Kennedy & Roosevelt – The Uneasy Alliance’ </b>New York, New York: W. W. Norton and Company 1980 This is the best book I ever encountered for understanding how Roosevelt changed in office.
<b>Dickson, Paul & Allen, Thomas B. ‘The Bonus Army – An American Epic’ New York, New York: Walker & Company 2006</b> An unknown WW1 veteran emerges to lead a march on Washington
<b>Beekman, Scott ‘William Dudley Pelley – A Life In Right Wing Extremism And The Occult’ Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press 2005 </b>This is a critical biography, but it is the only one which was published even decades after Pelley passed away.
<b>Bellamy, Edward ‘Looking Backward’ New York, New York: Dover Publications 1888-1996</b> This highly acclaimed and quite readable science fiction novel from 1888 is a pitch for the political third way of populism.
Bellamy’s writings were among William Dudley Pelley’s main inspirations, but even in Pelley’s time it took a bit of faith to believe that the predictions about credit cards, a large volunteer culture, and piped in music would eventually happen.
<b>Bendersky, Joseph W. ‘The Jewish Threat – Anti-Semitic Politics of the US Army'</b> New York, New York: Basic Books 2000 The US Army had a lot more in common with N. S. Germany than many would ever dream possible.
<b>Black, Edwin ‘War Against the Weak – Eugenics & America’s Campaign To Create A Master Race’ </b>New York, New York: Four Walls Eight Window 2003 There have been some very large but crude attempts to improve the race in our country, as once went on in National Socialst Germany as well, but far less controversial methods have emerged since.
<b>Goodwyn, Lawrence ‘The Populist Moment – A Short History of the Agrarian Revolt in America'</b> N. Y, New York: Oxford University Press 1978 The third way between Capitalism and Communism, and it preceded both fascism and national socialism.
<b>Schwantes, Carlos A. ‘Coxey’s Army – An American Odyssey’ Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press 1985 </b>This is the story of the military veterans who marched to Washington DC in 1894 in order to demand that the government stimulate a badly faltering economy by getting more silver into circulation and by launching public works programs for the unemployed. They were right, of course, but the weathy did not submit to these “radical” remedies until the Roosevelt years.
<b>Rockwell, George Lincoln ‘White Power’ </b>Arlington, Virginia: National Socialist White People’s Party 1967-77 Rockwell was assassinated while leading his supporters out of the style but not the substance of NS cultism, but he was also the populist genius who coined the slogan ‘White Power.’
<b>Rockwell, George Lincoln ‘This Time The World’ </b>Liverpool, West Virginia White Power Publications 1963-79 Rockwell accomplished a lot in his lifetime, as a commercial artist, naval commander, publisher, author, and nationally known speaker, but he also candidly recounts a lifetime struggle with alcoholism, the alienation of his two families, and less consciously his final descent into the NS cultism which left him isolated from even his White neighbors across the street.
<b>The History of Stormfront by Don Black</b>
<i>In 1990, while working on the David Duke for U.S. Senate Campaign, I set up a dial-in bulletin board system at my house, primarily for use by a couple of Duke staffers, who could ask questions and access database management applications as I updated them for the Campaign. I ran the board on an elaborate freeware script someone had written for the modem software Qmodem.
This was before most people had ever heard of the Internet, and BBSes were in their hayday, though limited primarily to computer hobbyists, since most people didn’t have PCs and modems. I decided to add other features to the board, making it accessible to other activists. I happened to ask a local friend, who then knew nothing about computers, if he had any ideas for a colorful name. He immediately suggested “Stormfront,” saying he had planned to call his Rock band that, but then Billy Joel had released a 1989 album entitled “Storm Front,” and he didn’t want anyone to think he’d copied a Jew. And so our “Stormfront” was born.
In July 1994, I switched to Wildcat! bulletin board software and made the board public, patterning it after the Cyberspace Minutemen board in Chicago. By then, I had been posting on Internet newsgroups for a couple of years, but connecting a BBS to the Net was an expensive proposition.
In late 1994, I set up an account with a local ISP which would allow the board to connect by UUCP to newsgroups, provide hosting for the very new protocal called the “World Wide Web,” and which, if I were willing to pay enough, allow “live” telnet access to the board. I also registered the domain name stormfront.org (deciding that, since it wasn’t commercial, the “.com” extension, which was actually derided in the Net community back then, wasn’t appropriate.
My local ISP was slow to get webhosting software working on his server, though, so by March, 1995, we still didn’t have a webpage. In the meantime, Stormfront the BBS was getting national publicity, sparked by a New York Times article in mid-March. When Mike von Fremd of ABC News called and said he wanted to bring a film crew down the next day, I decided I couldn’t wait any longer for a webpage. Since the webhosting provider didn’t need to be local, I called a provider I had met earlier in Metairie, La., and who I figured wouldn’t back down to the inevitable pressure from “survivors.” For $135/month plus setup fees, his people had the account going within a couple of hours.
I didn’t know much about html, though I had read a quick tutorial. I did a lot of copying of code from the few other sites running at the time, pulled articles and graphics I already had stored on the BBS, and, working all night, had the “Stormfront White Nationalist Resource Page,” with it’s large WPWW logo, ready for the cameras the next morning.
The day after the webpage went public, before ABC or any other mainstream news outlets ran their stories, we got 1700 visits. This was just through a few posts on newsgroups and other Internet-only sources. As the first pro-White website, we were a sensation.
International publicity would quickly follow. The OKC bombing a few weeks later would make a big difference, since much of the media wanted to somehow tie the newfangled and “dangerous” Internet with Timother McVeigh. They didn’t have much luck, but they did end up showing the Stormfront front page on television quite a few times. Newsweek magazine even carried the URL. Traffic surged.
I continued running the BBS, but the most popular discussion forum was the Stormfront-L maillist, which I set up shortly after the website and which ran through the BBS software.
Just over four years ago, we started using completely web-based discussion software, beginning with WebBoard, running on our own server. We moved to the current vBulletin software last August.
Within a couple of months, probably after the release of vBulletin 3.0, I plan to integrate the entire site with the vBulletin/MySql database, allowing for more efficient content management of the “static” webpages, including news articles and a Yahoo-like links directory.</i> <b>The Roots of Pioneer Little Europe</b>
The creator of the Pioneer Little Europe strategy for Americans is H. Michael Barrett, and he has had a long and eventful political career: Barrett’s father had been a ground mechanic for the RAF, his mother was a nurse in Northern Ireland, and both survived repeated German bombings during WW2.
Following the war, Barrett was born on one of the abandoned airdromes which dotted the Essex countryside in 1948, where his parents lived during the postwar housing shortage and rationing that continued.
The airdrome was a collective organized by Anarchists by that time. And Barrett was born in the former map reading hut, which had once served to orient pilots prior to their flights, a campaign primarily devoted to strafing roads and railways in France.
And Barrett recalls from his earliest memory the debris of war – abandoned vehicles, broken rifles, helmets and other training materiel there since D-Day – which lay strewn across the muddy farmer’s fields bordered by blackberry bushes.
Barrett’s parents had a number of reasons for moving to the United States, and these included: the discrimination they experienced because of their Irish Protestant and Catholic roots; the Smog which killed thousands in nearby London in 1952; and the stagnant postwar economy which provided very few jobs. His father was so desperate that he quietly sold an inherited sword, which had once belonged to his own grand father, Admiral Shaw, just to secure passage in 1954 for his new family to the United States on the Queen Mary.
First arriving in New York, Barrett’s family then continued to the San Francisco Bay Area by the new Zephyr Train. They had only one relative in California, a priest who had presided over the funeral of an earlier relative, Peter B. Kyne (author of the John Wayne film the Three Godfathers). And for the first years Barrett was treated for his severe Asthma. In 1959 the entire family became citizens, and today the family’s passport photos are in the Main Library’s history room, part of the immigrant record of that city’s oldest district.
Throughout 1963 Barrett spent the school year attending Rockwell College in County Tipperary, Ireland. One of his teachers there was Father Joseph Nolan, who assisted his own nephew Maurice Manning on the book The Blueshirts, the first complete book on the history of Irish fascism.
While at the college, which is where Eamon DeValera had taught math before the Irish Revolution, and where Sean Treacy and Dan Breen had regularly hid in an old castle on the grounds during the war with England, Barrett’s science teacher determined on one occasion that his “American” student had found the first fossil ever dug up on the school’s own grounds. It was a creature which had lived when Ireland was still covered by the sea.
During his vacations Barrett stayed with his Galway relatives on the shore of the Loch Corrib, and occasionally bicycled to places like Ashford Castle in Tuam, where The Quiet man with John Wayne and Maureen O’Hara had been filmed years earlier. And Barrett was in the crowd at Eyre Square when John F. Kennedy came and invited the assembled to knock on the door of the White House if they were ever in his own town.
In 1965 Barrett joined the US army just a few days after he was at the legal age to do so. The United States was building up its effort in Vietnam, and although 17-year olds were not permitted to go into combat zones, and Barrett was not required to go either, he soon began to experience an inner turmoil about his government being out of control.
Although he routinely made expert rifle scores during basic training at Fort Ord, California, his boyish muscles occasionally had difficulty even pulling back the bolt on his M-14 rifle. This would happen in the “inspect arms” position, where the chamber is opened while standing to rigid attention. And he became increasingly consicous of how youth and other categories of people were considered nothing more than cannon fodder to unworthy but privilaged politicians higher up a corrupt system (Which also kept American servicemen in Vietnam for so long that many eventually fathered children of their own with Vietnamese women).
After basic training at Fort Ord, California, Barrett was then sent for Advanced Military Training with the Signal Corps at Fort Gorden, Georgia. And this was because it was determined that he possessed a peculiar psychological profile associated with code breaking. Victor Hanson, the author of the book ‘Carnage & Culture’ provides a description of this kind of person, one known as a “decipher,” while covering the WW2 careers of Laurence Safford and Joseph Rochefort:
“It is difficult to determine which of the two was the more eccentric. Safford, who graduated from the naval academy at annapolis in 1916, was one of those people who are the despair of uniform tailors as well as orderly organizations. He wore his hair in the “mad professor” style and talked disjointedly because his mouth could not keep up with his mind; his forte was pure mathematics. Rochefort was mild-mannered, dedicated, and serious but also persistent, energetic and impatient of hierarchies and bureaucracy, his mind unfettered by orthodox training. (D. van der Vat, The Pacific Campaign, World War II , 88-89)”
Heightened even further by adolescent, a loss of faith in the Vietnam agenda prompted a series of nonviolent acts of resistance, which he expressed in two AWOLs (Absent without leave) and hitchhiked across the United States both east to west, then south to north. Six months later his last post was Fort Jay on Governor’s Island in New York, where he was stationed when the Great Blackout struck. Soon after that he managed to receive a discharge that was under honorable conditions (and remaining patriotic was eventually to use his veteran’s eligibility to join the American Legion).
By 1968 Barrett had quite consciously become a seeker who was researching his way through countless books, as he was determined to sort out exactly where he fitted into the world. His effort was especially centered on what to believe in and acting on it, as there was so much not to believe in. He adopted the habit of spending long hours in the main public library, making particular use of the guides and encyclopedias of philosophical, religious, and political beliefs.
Eventually he was to sort the matter out, frequently finding analogies between nature and mankind to arrive at the truth. This is how he arrived at the idea of race, a quality humans have in common with every other living species. And race as the central meaning of his life was “revealed” to him on a day that began like any other day, but a day when he was already enthused at having finally gained this basic lead. There was a book on a top shelf; it contained original writings about something called National Socialism, so he brought it down to examine more closely. He stood to read, just in case he would need to reshelf this book like the hundreds before.
The words, however, seemed to have been custom made for him. It was a message that touched him to the core of his being. He suddenly felt unbound and empowered as never before. There were tears of surprise in his eyes. For a few moments his entire body tingled as if it had picked up an electric charge, but it was a greater and more friendly experience than the static electricity that often surprised the library’s less familiar visitors when it bit. From his brain this peculiar energy coursed through his body until it reached his feet. Then it even seemed to leap outside and beside him
There was now a strangely unfamiliar visual experience as well, which he accepted as a kind of associated phenomenon: Small white flames about a foot high were clearly dancing on the floor. These vividly marked a pushing out of prior beliefs. Then they were gone. Years later Barrett would understand all this much better, when Dr. William Pierce’s personal secretary recommended a book to him called ‘Battle for the Mind’ by William Sargant. It was a controversial study that clearly detailed out that he had experienced total conversion.
On May 20, 1968 Barrett walked through the door of the NSWPP and fully dedicated himself to pro-White politics (George Lincoln Rockwell had been assassinated just nine months previously on August 25, 1967). Eventually Barrett was delegated to serve as armed bodyguard and driver to Robert Lloyd of the NSWPP throughout a northeast states tour of radio and television appearances. Lloyd’s wife had personally suggested the choice, as the journey was considered dangerous.
Lloyd had been Rockwell’s own favorite before becoming the number two person over the NSWPP. During this particular tour Lloyd met with a Chicago leader, Frank Collin, and attempted to have him step down. And following an even larger political split in 1970, Lloyd left the NSWPP with Dr. William Pierce. Barrett served as both Pierce’s first local street activist and Lloyd’s corporate partner for a bookshop called Western Destiny.
Pierce’s secretary Earl continued for a time with internal chores for Pierce, but when Earl – after whom the controversial Turner Diaries were named – tired of being a volunteer, and Lloyd closed up his shop and dropped out of politics, Barrett turned to helping Earl co-found a mail order business called White Legion Books.
And the first books sold were what Dr. Pierce was able to pay instead of wages. Years later, when the Turner Diaries was published, Barrett remembered how Dr. Pierce would often be working on it, and he hoped it would remain no more than a valid social protest in literature.
Eventually Barrett gave his portion of White Legion Books to Earl and returned to more active politics. He felt that Earl had contributed much more to the business than he had anyway, and Earl renamed the business Bibliophile Legion Books.
And Barrett recalls an occasion when Earl assisted Otto Skorzany in finding a first edition of his own book. Earl went on to publish some rare histories about Germany’s elite volunteers from many European nations, seems to have worked with Carto for a duration, but eventually didn’t leave much of a trail on the web.
By 1972 Barrett went to work as David Duke’s national organizer in New Orleans, though Duke certainly had fewer supporters in those early years. During that time Barrett revived the phrase ‘White Rights’ for Duke’s use, though a narrower version of it had been used earlier by Willis Carto.
After a few months, following a demonstration Barrett had titled as “Against the Vietnam War and Communism,” Duke, himself, and other supporters were thrown into Parish Prison and nearly killed in a large holding area (ref. Duke’s autobiography), then later they were partnered to the same cell.
Upon their release Barrett decided to return temporarily to work with Earl. And on the way home he stopped to meet Robert Shelton of the United Klans of America in Tuscaloosa, a gracious and entertaining host whose ice tea was also quite good.
And Barrett later stopped to meet Dr. Edward Fields and J. B. Stoner of the National States Rights Party, two more gracious hosts who momentarily brought in the brother of James Earl Ray to introduce himself in front of a set of double doors.
Back in Silverspring, Maryland, Barrett took a desk clerk position at the Baron building in nearby Washington, DC. It was one of five buildings at a complex called Columbia Plaza Apartments, where the State Department maintained a few suites of its own for its visitors.
And it was there that Barrett became the employee designated to sign in astronaut Michael Collins who, having just returned from commanding the first moon landing, was on his way to report to President Richard Nixon.
Barrett became determined to transform out of the unproductive ways of his high risk lifestyle; especially when there was rarely anything to show for it afterwards – politically or personally. Too often he had come close to death, or broken bones, and lived more painfully Spartan than those he helped. And thousands of other Whites activists had simply dropped out without figuring out what was causing the bottomless bucket effect in activism.
About this time Barrett experienced a second conversion; as he finally accepted that the existing ways of pro-White political activism – including National Socialism – needed to give way to something more American and modern.
This second experience began while he was laying down but wide awake. It was a peculiar sensation of falling from a great height, and that he would continue to fall until he hit the earth – unless he decided to jump up then and there to think and act more independently for himself. And Barrett managed to get up, there and then, and was startled to realize that he felt reborn. It was as if some enormous weight had suddenly been lifted away.
Continuing his studies again, Barrett became a kind of restless political Johnny Appleseed, and returned to San Francisco.
During the 1980s he visited the Mosleyites in London and began writing regularly for their newsletter Action, and the intellectual journal Lodestar which was edited by Diana Mosley. And Mosley’s secretary Jeffrey Hamm described Barrett as “the only person who ever managed to cross over this way from the other movement.”
And Barrett is the person who inherited the monogrammed ivory clothes brush which Oswald Mosley used throughout his adult life (OM had received it from his grandfather’s estate, the relative who had posed for the original John Bull cartoon).
The Little Europe articles for Americans first began appearing in Mosley’s Action, and later they were discussed during Phil Donahue’s national television show in the US on October 8, 1980. Donahue read nearly the entire contents of an advertisement about them to Robert K. Brown, editor of Soldier of Fortune Magazine.
The concepts were partly influenced by the ideas of Sir Oswald Mosley, and seemed a respectable enough “translation” for Americans when the editor of the IHR, Keith Stimely discovered them. Barrett convinced him that revisionism is unlikely to rehabilitate the roots of American National Socialism, but that an American ideology independent of national socialism’s wartime errors would greatly facilitate the public’s acceptance of many revisionist findings about WW2.
Already diagnosed with serious health problems, Stimely soon dropped his intention to complete an ambitious autobiography on Francis Parker Yockey – a fascist leader who died in San Francisco. Instead he focused his energy on an issue of the Journal of Historical Review which was noticeably generous to Yockey’s old boss, that other advocate of Europeanism who declared fascism obsolete, Mosley (Winter 1984).
Prior to his death, Stimely also published a Mosley-themed wall poster for his own classical music group, then donated his political correspondence with Barrett and others to the University of Oregon. There would be no ambiguity about his beliefs.
In October of 1985 Barrett became the assistant director of security (and soon to be director of security for fifteen years) of the Monadnock Building in San Francisco, a ten storied high rise in the financial district which at that time housed the San Francisco Bar Association & City Hall’s branch law library.
In the last weeks of its renovation, just before it opened, Barrett sometimes had to work grave shifts. On one such night he was examining the library of the Commonwealth Club for something to read, which is the most prominent organization for political speakers in the city. Barrett saw a small mimeographed booklet, which in itself suggested that it was intended for limited circulation, and he began reading it.
His first reaction to what he saw was that it was some sort of comedy piece, as it described how a small group of homosexuals was going to legally overthrow a local Irish-Italian neighborhood. As Barrett had himself come to the United States as an Irish immigrant, it caused him to continue reading. Eventually he realized that he was looking at the original six or eight page strategy constructed for the purpose of quickly routing all the residents of San Francisco’s Castro District; replacing them with the Gay culture there today.
The cleverness of this once highly confidential proposal was evidenced by what was still happening in the Castro. It wasn’t difficult to explain to anyone else, and so the details became etched in his mind as things do when they make a strong impression. Barrett put the book back on the shelf that night, and although it took him another seventeen years to compete the writing of PLE – which was expressed by hundreds of articles and an 88 page prospectus – that particular source was one of the most useful.
And it was very much like the day that he had found a small press issue of the Marxist classic, ‘the Mini-Manual of the Urban Guerilla,’ in a book shop located in San Francisco’s Italian district, North Beach. And Dr. Pierce rejoiced at being able dissect it, as it was a fundamental inspiration for a manuscript he was working on at the time, the fictional Turner Diaries.
The original background concepts of PLE were, however, more influenced by the ideas of Sir Oswald Mosley, and seemed even a respectable enough “translation” for Americans when the editor of the IHR, Keith Stimely read of them. Barrett’s articles convinced Stimely that revisionism was unlikely to rehabilitate National Socialism, but that an American ideology independent of WW2’s many controversies would greatly facilitate the public’s acceptance of many revisionist findings
Barrett eventually contributed articles to the American Friends of the British National Party. His work included most of his Little Europe series, and observations about immigration flooding Ireland. There was also a bit of family history, as he detailed a WW2 incident when William Joyce – aka William Joyce – spoke about his Anglo- Irish granduncle (the original H. Barrett) over the radio.
Barrett believes that eventually the militants and community builders of pro-White politics will come to understand one another remarkably well, and that is why he believes the PLE sites such as Euro-Knowledge and Stormfront are the cyberspace models of tommorow’s open community.
As the PLE method is a community strategy, it continues to evolve as many other hands engage it; so thank you Mark Cotterill, Ken of the White Alliance; Robert and Luis of Euroknowledge who provided the first volunteered web sites (we could use lots more to mirror the PLE articles); Stormfront’s Don Black for the “National Data Bank” Advance Scout, Longcounty Rebel, Labrat, Kayden, Aggro Saxon, April Gaede, and Phoenix.
<i>Consider printing out a hard-copy of this prospectus, occasionally checking back for any upgraded editions. And as long as the document is properly credited to H. Michael Barrett, the public is free to quote parts, fully republish, circulate, footnote, use on web sites, or freely comment on its content without charge. PLE organizers are also free to implement, if they must, projects which differ in their details from the recommendations.
The author, H. Michael Barrett, is now retired from a long time career as the
Director of Security for a high-rise building in downtown San Francisco, home of
the San Francisco Bar Association & the city’s branch law library. He also
[b]Question: Britain’s Sir Oswald Mosley was one of the few major fascist or national socialist leaders to survive the war. And, according to the book ‘Deeply Dyed In Black,’ you were one of its key figures in the postwar years. As such, what did Mosley have to say about your conclusion that the influence of the White Russian emigres is the most overlooked aspect of the early NSDAP by most historians today, and the long hidden key to truly understanding WW2? [/b](Ref: Macklin, Graham ‘Very Deeply Dyed in Black: Sir Oswald Mosley and the Resurrection of British Fascism After 1945’ London: International Library of Politics, 2007 – Barrett, pg 130)
Answer: I always relied on Mosley’s secretary, Jefferey Hamm, for any input on that sort of thing, as Mosley was semi-retired in France by that time. I arranged radio advertisments for Irish Americans in California, and then forwarded audio copies to Hamm. And whenever Hamm commuted to France he’d play those for OM and Diana at their dinner table. But Hamm was willing to say that the White Russians were a particularly sensitive subject. And I got the distinct impression that it was ever bit as painful a subject as when he recounted how David Irving published documents that verified the financial tie between the NSDAP and the British Union of Fascists & National Socialists.
[b]Question: You’ve described the late George Lincoln Rockwell’s pitch as a combination of populist genius and an impotent cultism about German NS, pointing out that even his own White neighbors didn’t generally know who he was, but what have you to say about his defining of WW2 as “The Civil War of the White Race” and his position that our country simply picked the wrong side?[/b]
Answer: There is no shortage of even mainstream historians who see WW2 as a civil war among the European peoples, but to disparage anyone’s military heritage is a very foolish thing to do in politics. Keep in mind that White people will come over to us from many countries if we’re sensitive to military experiences which are firmly tied into their self-esteem and a loyalty to their national community.
Look at this on a smaller scale first: In the PLE target area we are advising White Nationalists to lay claim to both of the heritages of the American Civil War – their own and that of other WNs – and then come together within a common front, which we refer to as populism or at its most militant “legionism brought into politics.”
Now back to WW2, and again you’ll see that each side had things that we need in a very big way. For example, no one can take away the fact that the Germans of that time – and even many before the war – placed a very high value on the a non-Jewish White ethnic community (Volksgemeinschaft) when others did not; and the United States placed a high value on checking Japanese expansionism and its attendant atrocities and humiliations directed against Whites and their Chinese allies – when Germany did not.
Most White Nationalists are aware of that much, but let’s not neglect the ethnic nationalists of East Europe and Russia. Many of them are ex-Stalinists; so we need to avoid overreacting when they occasionally still credit him as their great modernizer, a proponent of German unity, the one who led them in opposing German colonialism and resisting Jewish ethnic stratification.
In fact, with both “civil wars,” all the groups and individuals offering pro-White spins within the PLE target area are going to have to pick and choose their values carefully. A failure to become at least emotionally detached enough, while recruiting strangers within the PLE target area, means that there will for a time be no shortage of WNs who will clash with others needlessly just because they want to carry baggage from the past about slaves or concentration camps or god knows what.
[b]Question: From this PLE perspective, then, what did Rockwell actually get right?[/b]
Answer: Rockwell sought to balance out what he wanted to use from Germany with a more traditional offering of American values; but a contradictory emotional attachment to both sometimes made him look as if he wanted to run with the hounds and hide with the fox. His approach included a strong personal identification with General Douglas MacArthur and Senator Joseph McCarthy in ‘This Time the World,” and his phase two plan at least put aside much of the Nazi imagery.
[b]Question: The PLE prospectus cautions White people to avoid getting bogged down in a cultism about German NS, but what about the military cultism which routinely dominates American gun shows?[/b]
Answer: That’s something that wlll work in our favor when raising up White consciousness whenever it’s done properly; because the values of a true PLE align remarkably close to the values reflected by the supporting goods available at most American gun shows. Our residents and their customers are mostly the same people. For example, gun shows have always had controversies about how much NS imagry is productive or unproductive, and so does our community.
And any culture shop organizer within a PLE target area who would like to examine a sterling example – in the interest of contributing to the “Uncontrolled White Nationalist Culture” – should consider visiting [url=http://www.Militaryissue.com]Military Issue : War Books, DVDs, Models, Figures and More.[/url] (They send out a far more impressive 64 page catalog as well).
My favorites there, as they’re colorful reminders of the worldwide era of the various national socialisms, would include the miniature model offered of Roosevelt’s 1939 Lincoln V-12 Sunshine and Hitler’s Mercedes-Benz 770. Both of them were bulletproof.
And those many offerings, in DVDs, books, dolls (including one of Eva Braun), flags, and rings, are nearly always accompanied by sober reviews which don’t treat figures such as Hitler, Napoleon, and Caesar as those who should somehow have adopted exactly the same values as ourselves today.
[b]Question: For the purposes of PLE building today, what do you estimate is the most neglected aspect of WW2 in the European theater by historians?[/b]
Answer: The most neglected area, at least for our purposes, even though we are recommending the emotionally detached view above, is what was really going on between Germany and the White Russians before and during WW2 (The term White Russia came from Czar Alexius of Moscow in 1667 to denote the lands which he said he had rescued from Lithuanian-Polish domination, before that the region was Byelorussaia).
In fact, consider the matter yourself: Hollywood has generated a remarkable number of films about WW2, but how many are ever about the area where it was actually decided, in the Soviet Union? Historicans refer to this problem as “lacunae,” as it’s like trying to make sense of a book when many of its pages are missing. And even what is offered in the public media tends to resemble what would result if reporters with mixed feelings were embedded most of the time with the German military. The lacunae causes serious misconceptions.
[b]Question: The libraries are filled with books about WW2. Are you saying that some major revelations are still not widely known?[/b]
Answer: Yes. What happened immediately after the war, when the Soviets were still “valued partners” among the allies, is that they acquired the bulk of the NSDAP archives related to the White Russian emigres who assisted them in forming a foreign policy toward the Bolsheviks. And besides Russia, other portions of the archives were taken off to France, the United States, and Israel; so it’s only in recent decades that historians with multilingual abilities have been able to get into these archives to see the complete picture and publish their findings in English.
[b]Question: How does an ignorance in that area interfere with what we’re trying to do?[/b]
Answer: What happens is that Hitler’s NSDAP and the campaign he carried out in Russia and elsewhere are left too widely open to interpretation by even White activists. It divides us between those who see Hitler’s NSDAP as an anomaly in German history and those who know it isn’t, and that further divides us between those who expend a great deal of time countering accusations of genocide on the Russian front and those who do not.
This creates a propaganda contradiction and fuels an impotent cultism, where some will hand you a book like the Turner Diaries, a neo-national socialist’s fictional story of a future genocide, and follow that up with a book declaring that Germany’s national socialists didn’t participate in such things.
Obviously, many people feel unsure of the truth, and it all goes back to when the Soviets were participating in the denazification process. This is a veil that would not have been created had some key documents not been suppressed, such as the book Alfred Rosenberg (former Minister of the Eastern Territories, and the only other person to have led the NSDAP) wrote during the Nuremberg Trials to explain what the NSDAP was really all about; what they were really doing in Russia, and why in his estimate Germany had so unnecessarily lost the war.
[b]Question: Is there any evidence that especially powerful donors contributed to the Nazis in the period from 1918 to 1923?[/b]
Answer: According to James Pool, the author of ‘Who Financed Hitler,’ most of Hitler’s donations from within Germany came from radical nationalist or anti-Semitic individuals, but the wealthy White Russian emigres were the one big interest group (pg 63). These were the people who had fled the Russian Revolution when the monarchy fell and they were the primary ideological influences for shaping Hitler’s views of the Bolsheviks as a Jewish cabal with the potential for taking over the world, instead of also taking into account the more primary and ongoing pressures of democratization and industrialization which blew the monarchy away like a cork from a champagne bottle.
[b]Question: Was Hitler’s Nazi Party really a kind of freakish anomaly in German history that suddenly emerged from the gutter and all that?[/b]
Answer: Far from it, and the truth is soon revealed to anyone with the patience to follow the trail:
During WW1 the Bolsheviks ended Russia’s participation in the conflict in order to consolidate their political power. At that time Germany’s General Ludendorf was working in Russia with the monarchist opponents of Bolshevism, and the White Russian officers and volkish Germans in support of monarchy in both countries realized that they had so much in common that they continued that relationship after returning to Germany.
That activity included not only some official interventions by Germany in the Baltic, Ukraine, and Byelorussia (where they aligned with non-German anti-communists of many other East European nationalities who also knew communism was Jewish led) but also less formal and secretive efforts by that particular military faction to affect German politics during the turbulence of the 1920s.
Employed as an especially brilliant educational agent by this faction, which was keeping a low profile within the traditional army establishment that had survived WW1 because of a negotiated settlement with the allies, Hitler was delegated to take over a group which eventually they’d mold into the NSDAP.
And the key personalities who were gathered to assist Hitler were the volkish Germans and White Russian emigres who were already providing the funding and writing for such German volkish/ Russian Emigre supported groups as the Thule Society and Aufbau.
It was very important to emphasize a working class image of the leader and his party in those unsettled times, and even in the post-WW2 years when a “denazification program” was created to wipe away as much embarrassing information as possible for the various allied nations – especially the Russians, Hitler was re-packaged even lower as a kind of former homeless eccentric. Little or nothing was usually said of the wealthy Russian emigres behind the scenes.
Artifically manufacturing a lumpen-proletariat myth around Hitler also generated false hope within the minds of postwar NS cultists, those who thought that they could easily do the same thing; without ever having at least one traditional and credible foot in the establishment.
Hitler the political agent, however, actually travelled within an upper class social milieu (however middle class he was personally); including those in the military who were either volkish Germans or White Russian emigre officers who hoped to restore another Romanov to the throne with Germany’s assistance.
And it was actually these people, based on an examination of Hitler’s personal correspondence, who introduced him to the controversies about Jews and the inside story on how both sides in the Russian Civil War had targeted entire classes or ethnic groups during their campaigns.
[b]Question: Did Hitler ever support the idea of restoring the monarchy in Germany?[/b]
Answer: Yes, but as living conditions worsed in Germany and ordinary Germans lost faith in the more privileged and even democracy itself – concepts which managed to reach a compromise in more settled nations like the United States and England – Hitler abandoned his interest in openly restoring the monarchy shortly before he came to power.
That was only a leftward political correction on the surface, as many key members of Europe’s nobility still assisted Hitler into power because their agenda and his was so similar. As this still goes unnoticed by many historians and the general public today, there’s a widespread myth often repeated that “The power of Europe’s royals ended during WW1.”
Despite this nonsense, National Socialism had the support of Prince Charles Edwards even before it came to power. A Briton who had become German, he had been Queen Victoria’s favorite grandson. And not only were there cousins of the Romanovs in the party before it had come to power, but eventually hundeds of Germany’s nobles joined the party. And later, Hitler’s foreign policies were also assisted by well placed friends throughout the royal houses of Europe.
[b]Question: What was Aufbau?[/b]
Answer: Aufbau, or reconstruction, represented many White Russians in Germany who had fled the Bolsheviks. These desired to overthrow the Weimar Republic in order to have a foreign policy to invade Russia, overthrow the Bolsheviks, and install Kirill Romanov and themselves to power.
Aufbau’s members worked with General Ludendorff during the Russian Civil War, assisted the Kapp Putsch attempt, the Hitler/Ludendorff Putsch attempt, and had a leadership which overlapped with the leadership of the NSDAP.
Most important of these was Max von Scheubner-Richter, a kind of Lawrence of Arabia figure who just a few years earlier had served as the German vice-consul in Erzerum, Ottoman Turkey.
He had witnessed the genocide of the Armenians in 1915, and tried to stop it, but his biographer, Paul Leverkuehun, author of ‘A German Officer During the Armenian Genocide,’ says he actually held far less sentimental views about Jews.
Scheubner-Richter was killed during the Hitler/Ludendorff Putsch. Sometimes described as a virtual co-founder of the NSDAP, Hitler described him as the one man who couldn’t be replaced.
[b]Question: Who was Lieutenant Piotr Shabelskii-Bork?[/b]
Answer: Bork had served as an advisor to the Tsaritsa, but he arrived too late to save the Romanov’s from being killed in the basement at Ekaterinburg during the Bolshevik’s war of extermination.
Bork then participated in the official investigation at the murder site. There he noted down that the Tsaritsa had cut a swastika to show her location, as she had a favorite necklace in that design, and had been reading the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, a book alleging that there’s an international conspiracy by Jews to take over the world. Bork also noted that there was graffiti there in German, Hungarian, and Yiddish.
Later Bork became a personal advisor on foreign policy to Adolf Hitler during the NSDAP’s formative period. He brought along a copy of the Protocols, and it made such an impression on Hitler that he discussed it in Mein Kampf. Why would Hitler be so interested? The Tsarina was from the Hesse-Darmstadt branch of the German nobility.
[b]Question: When was the swastika flag officially adopted by Hitler’s NSDAP?[/b]
Answer: August 7, 1920 at the Salzburg Congress.
[b]Question: When was Bork’s story about the murder of the Romanov’s and the swastika left by the Tsaritsa published in Germany’s Volkischer Beobachter (Volkisch Observer)?[/b]
Answer: That wasn’t publicly revealed until the next month, in the September 1920 issue, shortly before that publication became the official organ of the National Socialists. And remarkably, despite this being publicly documented by the NSDAPs own newspapers, it’s rare to encounter anyone even today who knows about the Russian origin of the swastika.
[b]Question: The NSDAP used a synthesis of meanings in its propaganda, bringing together volkish Germans and White Russian emigres who fled the Bolshevik war of extermination, so what would that symbol have meant to the latter group?[/b]
Answer: It was a semi-public assurance that White Russian support was going to a party that would eventually avenge them in as uncompromising a manner as they were used to fighting in. The terror of the left, in Hitler’s view, was to be broken by an even greater terror from the right. The German word for a war of extermination and destruction is “Vernightung.”
[b]Question: Why didn’t Hitler put a stronger public emphasis on the ideological and financial contributions of his White Russian emigre supporters?[/b]
Answer: Most political parties handle information of that nature as confidentially as possible.
[b]Question: What would Hitler say privately in his later years about the White Russian emigres?[/b]
Answer: On page 602 of Hitler’s Secret Conversations (Signet Edition) he jokes that the early Voelkischer Beobachter had so many Balts (Russian subjects) that it should really have been called Muenchener Beobachter – Baltische Ausgabe.
Question: According to what Hitler says in his book Mein Kampf, most of the outside world was introduced to the NSDAP and its flag during the march to the Fortress of Coburg in October, 1922. He adds that this was in response to a personal invitation that he received from the organizers of a ‘German Day, but mysteriously he never says why it was so important to show the muscle of the party in that particular location. What do historians make of all that now?
Answer: From Michael Kellogg’s ground-breaking ‘The Russian Roots of Nazism – White Emigres and the making of National Socialism 1917-1945’ (Cambridge University Press, 2005 pg.158), we have this:
[i] The first major National Socialist expedition, a trip to Coburg to participate in a German Day on October 14 and 15, 1922, suggests the increasing convergence of Aufbau and National Socialist policies behind the legitimist movement around Kirill (Romanov). Hitler and his mentors Eckart and the Aufbau ideologue Rosenberg, among others, arrived in Coberg, the seat of Kirill’s shadow government, with 800 members of the paramilitary Sturmabteilung (Storm Section, SA).[/i]
[b]Question: Whatever happened to Kirill Romanov in the years that followed?[/b]
Answer: Kirill died in October of 1938, and the White emigre community still remaining in Germany under General Biskupskii’s direction threw its support to Kirill’s son Vladimir Romanov.
[b]Question: Whatever happened to Aufbau?[/b]
Answer: After the failure of the Hitler/Ludenforff Putsch in November 8, 1923, and the death of Aufbau’s leader Scheubner-Richter, it was continued temporarily on paper by his associate General Biskupskii. Then it was disbanded as so many of its supporters had fled to avoid the investigations and arrests that followed. For the period of his confinement, Hitler put Rosenberg in charge of the party to signal that he wasn’t through with his valued Russian supporters (And forget the myth about picking Rosenberg because he was weak, as this was a period in the party’s history when Hitler was greatly influenced by him).
But the last issue of its publication Aufbau Correspondence appeared on June 15, 1924. And all that’s the fully fleshed out reason, though certainly not made known until modern times, for why Hitler described Scheubner-Richter as “the one man who could not be replaced.” It was about where the financial support was coming from, and more. This is also the point in the NSDAP’s history where it leaves most of the real Russians behind, while keeping many Baltic-Germans and other White minorities.
Question: In later years, Hitler invaded Poland and Russia, and eventually called upon the large number of anti-communists encountered to join his crusade to free the world of what they all routinely termed Jewish-Bolshevism, but was he supportive of their interests?
Answer: Initially Hitler prioitized the recruitment of those who were of Germanic stock, as he truly believed that the war would primarily be won by Germany, and he showed a typical Austrian devaluation of Slavic people. The harsh colonial form of his policies earlier in the war, including the use of ethnic cleansing reflected that as well, but in the Fall of 1944 absolute desperation drove him to recruiting Slavs. Anyone in doubt may refer to the book: “Forgotten Holocaust: The Poles Under German Occupation 1939-1944” by Richard C. Lukas.
Also, according to a 2003 Europa book (Bayside, New York) co-authored by a German soldier ‘Hitler’s White Russians: Collaboration, Extermination and Anti-Partisan Warfare in Byelorussia, 1941-1944’ by Antonio Munoz & Dr. Oleg V. Romank Bayside, New York:
From June 1941 until December 1942 Hitler ordered the use of terror and repression; frequently alienating even many citizens of the Soviet union who would have embraced Germany’s campaign against communism.
This was in stark contrast to Hitler’s more moderate minister for the east, Alfred Rosenberg, who frequently found himself left out of the loop by Hitler or aggressively “assisted” by less compromising people who were more narrowly German in their agenda.
Eventually, however, everyone including Hitler recognized that Russia could only be conquered by Russians (as their opponents had learned in suffering and then fought back tenaciously); so an enormous number of captured Russians were permitted to join a more sincere European crusade. Again, in politics this is viewed as a leftward correction.
Hitler’s emergency use of manpower began in December of 1942 and lasted until May 1945, but that support only had great effect after the critical turning-points of the war were already lost by Germany.
Question: Should we also be surprised that Stalin called upon his countrymen to fight for mother Russia instead of Bolshevism?
Answer: Not really, because even before Stalin rose to supreme power he was delegated responsibility over his country’s ethnic nationalities, and he had long recognized that these nationalities would fight for their homelands much sooner than for an economic creed.
Additionally, historian Sven Steenerg, a former German army interpreter who’s expert in this area, points out that Stalin would have been especially concerned at all times about what kind of deal Hitler might eventually strike with his almost one million White Russian supporters, and potentially far more.
Again, within the bounds of his Marxism, this was another rightward possibility and he took it. Stalin called on his countrymen to support the leadership of mother Russia, the unity of the Slavs, and every major ethnic-nationalist group had its own military uniform patch for this counter-crusade.
Question: Hitler frequently declared that he was at war with International Jewry, so the Zionists and NS cultists are both happy to leave us with the impression that the Jews were indeed the primary target. But is that really accurate?
Answer: No, that’s not accurate: Sustaining the effort to win the war overrode every other concern for Hitler, so it was actually the 30 million inhabitants of the Soviet Union – mostly members of the White race – who were targeted from the early weeks of 1941 onward for a death by deliberate starvation. The Reich Ministry of Food and the Wehramachht called this the Hunger Plan, and it was organized before anyone alleges any intententional reduction of the European Jews, many of whom were employed within the war industries.
The Russians were not kept ignorant of the details either, as many of those directed to carry out the policy were regularly falling into their hands. As you can project, this made it all that much easier for any Russian with common sense to choose between Stalin’s sudden call to Slavic nationalism and Hitler’s colonialism. Ref: ‘The Wages of Destruction – The Making & Breaking of the Nazi Economy’ by Adair Tooze, Viking/Penguin Books, NY, NY 2007.
Were there any indications that Hitler’s own White Russian volunteers were disappointed by how their people were being treated?
Answer: Yes, In December of 1944 an entire battalion of volunteers, led by Waffen-Obersturmfuhrer der-SS Zyballo, defected to the Marquisards. This group included Byelorussians, Ukrainians, Poles, and other “eastern peoples.” Ref: ‘Hitler’s White Russians by Antonio Munoz and Dr. Oleg V. Romanko, Europa Books, N.Y. 2003 And on May 6, 1945, on the Eastern front, where General Andrei Vlasov commanded the Russian Liberation Army, he approved a request from one of his officers to turn their weapons against the Nazi SS forces and aid Czech resistance fighters in the Prague uprising. Ref: Wikipedia.
Question: Hitler and Stalin were both obviously trying to reposition their ideological messages for the purpose of winning the war, so how did those competing messages go with the people who heard them?
Answer: The Red Army was monitoring the mails for Stalin, even in areas that were known to be politically unstable, but after reviewing the results he drew the conclusion that the Germans were interacting with the Russians in ways which greatly resembled the values of the Romanovs.
For him that was enormously good news, as he estimated that those values would be less appealing to his countrymen than the rising tide of ethnic nationalism all across eastern Europe – even when it was complicated by Marxism; especially when Hitler was so reluctant to cater to it that he didn’t take it up until the key turning points of the war were lost.
Question: This was of course the biggest game of chess in the history of the world, but why do you say that from the PLE perspective that it was all played out on the background of a rising democratic wave? After all, neither Hitler nor Stalin would be considered very democratic.
Answer: That’s quite right, both were dictators, but just as the example of Oliver Cromwell in Britain or Napoleon Bonaparte confirms, when riding history’s ongoing democratic wave even the most unmerciful dictator is sometimes contributing to it.
Question: If that’s the case, then exactly when was that happening with Hitler and Stalin?
Answer: Even before the war, in anticipation of his eventual passing, Hitler directed Albert Speer to design a meeting chamber for a more representative form of government (ref. Photo section of ‘Inside the Third Reich’). And Stalin’s lexicon frequently engaged the word democratic, though the lives he took as he tore out Russia’s obsolete medieval culture would certainly seem to contradict its spirit.
Also, as Hitler and Stalin made each one of their ideological corrections (listed in this article), they were accommodating an ongoing democratic trend in history that neither of them could have obstructed or sized up in its fullest dimension while actually having to operate within it. Both cases followed a kind of Hegelian logic: Two steps forward, one step back.
[b]Question: Was there any other trend on the rise during WW2?[/b]
Answer: Hitler, Stalin, and Roosevelt were stimulating industrialization, regional nationalisms, and their economies as they engaged and tweaked their armed forces into a higher effectiveness.
The Germans had certainly proven during the invasion – despite having to rely on a quarter million horses – that their strategy was the best that the world had seen up to that time, so Stalin embraced Germany’s military strategy in its entirety to roll them back. In fact, he was known to frequently compliment the abilities of the German soldier.
Stalin also took advantage of his nation’s greater population, eventually mobilizing three times the number of troops that Hitler’s advisers had estimated would oppose them. And Russia manufactured the biggest tanks, with the minimum amount of construction materials, and in the greatest numbers; not necessarily fitting them with all the bells and whistles that Germans were inclined to adhere to. It’s a peculiar trait of Russian military manufacturing that’s still employed today.
[b]Can you provide a few specific examples of how military competition between Germany and Russia contributed to an ongoing democratic undercurrent throughout the world?[/b]
Answer: Yes, NS Germany developed the StG44 machine gun (Which Hitler was personally impressed with when he test-fired it), then a Slavic genius by the name of Mikhail Kalashnikov lifted and refined many of its key aspects to create the AK-47.
In 1953 Nikita Khrushchev decided to provide this weapon to Soviet satellite states to resist the threat of Western encroachment, but it soon began appearing in the hands of anti-Soviet rebels as well, beginning with the 1956 uprising. The Ak-47’s simple mechanics were easy to decipher and quickly reproduced.
It also developed a mystique from the successes of the regular soldiers and revolutionaries it empowered throughout the world, until today there’s an AK-47 for every seventy people on the planet. Ref: ‘The Gun’ by C. J. Chivers, Simon & Shuster, NY, NY 2010
Many who are blind to democratic currents are pseudo-National Socialists who are apparently unaware that even Hitler, in 1943, affixed his signature to a document which launched the Russian Liberation Movement of General Vlasov. It formally signalled the end of Hitler’s belief that he could colonize Russia, signalled the end of the kind of propaganda which portrayed the Slavs as inferior, and was a sincere effort to promote a democracy in Russia by and for the Russian people as the best way to bring down Stalin. It had simply come too late.
Despite this Hitler saw no reason to change his own form of governent, as his position was actually legally sustained (as strange as that will seem to many moderns) by various aspects of Germany’s democratic constitution.
On July 25, 1943 a majority of the representatives within Italy’s Fascist Council deposed Benito Mussolini, voted in favor of establishing a constitutional monarchy with parlimentry representation, and desolved themselves.
[b]Question: Why is it in the interest of Whites to take into account history’s ongoing Democratic undercurrent, whether there’s the occasional Cromwell, Napoleon, or Hitler?[/b]
Answer: It has to be taken into account because the existing type of White community throughout the Western world was eventually rendered obsolete in the postwar world, after so many people were misled into believing that outsiders should be “democratically absorbed” into their community.
[b]Question: But isn’t that kind of democratic inclusion only natural considering everything that you’ve covered here?[/b]
Answer: No, it’s not. At the very beginning of our Western Civilization, at the time of the Greeks, the primary concept of life was the “polis,” or community. And it’s from these people that the modern understanding of democracy originates, whether they embraced it in limited ways or idealistically expanded ways, but they never chose democracy as a way to overthrow the polis.
[b]Question: Hitler had supporters among the Monachists of Sweden, England, Italy, Russia, Germany and other nations, but did they remain with him to the bitter end?[/b]
Answer: No, they didn’t. Each group tended to fall away away as they felt the pressures of the war, and the nobles of Germany signalled the absolute end of their own reliability when many of them backed a noble by the name of Count Claus von Struffenberg in an attempt to assassinate Hitler. In response, the National Socialists didn’t just search for his fellow plotters but also began removing nobles from sensitive leadership positions.
[b]Question: After WW2 Germany went through a very public process known as de-Nazification, so why didn’t we hear much more about Hitler and the support he received from international nobility from before power until the end?[/b]
Answer: A general outline of it is actually there, if you look closer for a separate process publicly known as de-Nobilization. This actually permitted the Western Democracies to quietly connect the nobles and their wealth to the postwar economy. One of the best books on this neglected aspect of the war, as it reveals many of the confidential factors which influenced Hitler’s foreign policies, is ‘The Royals and the Reich’ by Jonathan Petropoulos: Oxford Univerity Press, N.Y., N.Y. 2006
[b]Question: Many people go on and on about Hitler’s way, or the Spartan way, but are Whites really through with democracy? [/b]
Answer: Quite the contrary: As an incorrect understanding of this valuable tool continues to destroy the existing type of White community, what the PLE prospectus proposes is that WNs (not ordinary Whites) raise up of a new model of the White community by releasing an “uncontrolled White Nationalist culture” in the target area to democratically permit all WN spins to compete with each other, and democratically permit all opponents to begin packing while all the excitement is occurring.
But following that, as the wild west effect reduces, WNs will be free to raise up institutions of a more republican (not necessarily to be confused with an American party presently availing itself of that name) or elite form.
As for “Hitler’s way,” after leading his NSDAP to a near victory in a general election he said “It is the fundamental thesis of democracy that all the powers derive from the people.” Throughout most of the NSDAP’s existence its economic program was solidly based on the most democratic free market forces. Prior to Hitler even consolidating power his Marxist opponents were distracted by the familiarity of all this, and they decided to oppose the Social-Democrats instead. Hitler did not move into a totalitarian or wartime economy until his regime’s last years!
And unknown to most people (But revealed in 1970 by a former German army interpreter and revisionist historian, Sven Steenberg), by November 14, 1944 Hitler realized that Russia wasn’t going to be colonized by a German dictatorship, so he quietly signed a document in front of SS witnesses approving the ‘KNOR Manifesto.’ This advocated a democratic program for the Russian people based on a non-Bolshevik interpretation of the Russian Revolution. Reference: Steenberg, Sven ‘Vlasov’ New York, New York: Alfred A Knopf 1970 pg. 157
It is also possible to point out remarkably democratic aspects to other areas of life in National Socialist Germany. Many people who see photos of Hitler’s home in Berchtesgaden are amazed to discover that he permitted a non-conformist group called the “Wandering Birds” to travel all over his property. These were young people who were into a kind of Bohemian lifestyle about the outdoors, conservative predessessors to the modern hippie, and occasionally they can be found in the background of Eva Braun’s private photos.
The Spartans also combined a number of political traditions, including democracy. In both cases democracy was seen as something which fit in somewhere. And it’s an important political tool for us too, a vital part of the European’s nature that most nonWhite cultures have little success with.
The word was originally coined 7 to 10 centuries before the Greeks by the Mycenaeans. The two syllable word “damos” referred to a group of powerless people who once held land in common, but they also appointed an official or “damokoi” to act on their behalf. Now here’s the thing to notice: Whites today, unlike every other ethnic group, are prevented from having a say over their common living area. Only the democratic rights of Whites are obstructed.
[b]Question: Some of us support pro-White organizations which have done this differently for decades, embracing the idea that it’s the elite which makes history.[/b]
Answer: The elites will eventually seize any revolution, but it’s usually the masses who begin the process. Those who are interested in the real story of the American Revolution, for example, should pick up a copy of ‘American Insurgents – The Revolution of the People’ by T. H. Breen (Hill & Wang 2010). The authors do a nice job of fleshing out the story most textbooks neglect, about how a sudden militancy rose out of thousands of ordinary farmers and villagers in early 1774, and only after that did 56 ambitious gentlemen convene the first Continental Congress. The latter were “in the extremely awkward position” of having to follow the lead of angry commoners.
Question: Who was on watch in Germany when the door was first opened to a staggering number of foreigners?
Answer: Ironically, Germany’s immigration crisis began under Hitler’s watch. What had happened is that a much abused Germany had temporarily gone quite feral, and with a need to compete with other great powers – or have its economy grind to a halt – Hitler launched an all out attack on Russia. And that didn’t have much anything to do with some idealistic concept of spreading White pride worldwide.
No, it was about nothing less than bringing down “Jewish Bolshevism” and colonizing Russians and Slavs (members of the White race) and their living space. In the attempt to do this, however, Hitler not only drained and expended much of his nation’s best manhood (see David Starr Jordan’s anti-war book ‘The Blood of the Nation’ if this subject seems important to you), but he also absorbed into Germany a tremendous number of foreigners to fill the manpower loss and keep his industries going.
Racial sensitivities were to be temporarily cast aside or liberalized for this gamble, and a staggering number of those who arrived were either partly Jewish, non-Germanic Whites, Asians, Arabs, and even Negroes (Ref: Veronica Clark’s two volume set ‘Black Nazis’ was one many efforts to detail this much neglected subject which actually offers researchers no shortage of stunning photos as well.)
There are also two videos on Youtube about this: [url=http://youtu.be/2Gtfq8I88AM]Black Nazis – HD – YouTube[/url]
Many of these were former Soviet prisoners, but others came in from fascist countries throughout the world. Then after the war, even though most were returned to their native lands, many returned again as Germany’s economy was restored; especially the Turks, as they had been in close contact with the Germans since the 17th century. This is why the Turks are the largest minority in Germany today. The German business community’s appetite had been wetted by what it accomplished during wartime under Hitler, but many soldiers never came home, so the foreigners eagerly accepted the invitations to return.
Question: Yes, well Roosevelt did indeed say publicly that many people attacked his economic program as resembling what was implemented in Italy and Germany, but why did the majority support him?
Answer: They supported him because the US constitution actually permits a president to temporarily bring a certain amount of militancy into politics (in PLE we coin the term cultural-legionism just to give it a name), but then they’re generally supposed to relinquish such emergency powers when the crisis passes.
Question: Has that transition always gone smoothly?
Answer: Most of it usually goes smoothly, but a number of presidents, including Roosevelt, brought the United States into armed conflict without the approval of Congress.
Question: How did WW2, the civil war of the White race, break the integrity of the existing type of White community?
Answer: Primarily it happened because of the rapid relocation of the huge number of people required for war work. In the United States, for example, Blacks once dotted the rural areas. These moved en mass to many major cities to work in the war industries, and as they formed local communities in those urban areas they automatically began a corresponding ascent in political influence by concentration (as we advocate for WNs). Eventually Blacks would also demand entry to the White communities.
In Hitler’s Germany something similar happened: During the war so many different types of people were brought into Germany for war-work that during the final days the fascist novelist Celine observed that it seemed as if all the world’s people were there, but broken in spirit now as if the world was ending.
Then after the war, German business maintained its habit of importing foreign laborers for the sake of productivity. And wherever the outsiders formed actual communities, they burned a huge hole in the obsolete type of White community.
That’s quite unlike today’s White Nationalist “community”, which still remains largely dotted harmlessly all across the general population, and does not possess political influence. Ironically, today it’s anyone except the conscious Whites (WNs) who concentrate their supporters as once Hitler did in Munich (before terraforming the nation).
Question: What kind of relationship do you foresee between the residents/activists of PLEs and historical revisionists; especially on the controversy about the death of millions of Jews during WW2
Answer: Pro-White groups and individuals still have widely contrasting views on that subject, but whatever their spin they’ll be able to express themselves far more safely with any PLE community’s support for free speech. Personally I have no difficulty believing that the German military was waging a “war of extermination” by bullet and by starvation when it invaded Russia, and Hitler did write in Mein Kampf that “the terror of the left can only be broken by an even greater terror from the right.”
Despite that, I’ve never been able to dismiss some of the key points of the revisionists because what the mainstream press has to say about the concentration camps remains rife with strange contradictions. Additionally, it’s not even considered a subject of free inquiry.
If mass gassings were going on in the camps, instead of a more likely intentional starvation process, why were so many of the people allegedly responsible often given only two or three years in jail? Why did Heinrich Himmler, who otherwise seemed to be an intelligent person, ever bother to ask the allies about a negotiated a peace and being treated as an honorable soldier? Why wasn’t there any mention of a “six million” scandal immediately following the war?
Why did the allies feel it necessary to suppress everything possible about the ‘Transfer Agreement’ that the National Socialists signed with the Zionists when Hitler came to power? Why is it not generally known, even to many NS cultists, that the real National Socialists actually kept their diplomatic channels throughout the war open with the Zionists? Why were large portions of the material in Alfred Rosenberg’s and Adolf Eichmann’s biographies suppressed?
Why was so little information ever given to the general public about how the White Russian emigres shaped the early NSDAP? And why was the public not told that in 1943 Hitler dropped his intention to colonize Russia, dropped all propaganda about inferior Slavs, and endorsed a sincerely democratic movement by and for the Russian people as the best way to bring down Stalin.
Any of us can be right or wrong about what all that suggests, but a conscious and self-determining kind of White communty (a PLE) is what we must have if historians are going to safely talk about it.
And asking these quesitons isn’t gong to tarnish the residents of a PLE target area with being advocates of Hitlerism, unless a few are into some cutlism about it, as most of us are quite aware that even the German people weren’t willing to continue on that wave-length after Berlin fell.
Question: Was the aggressively anti-communist view of the Nazis based on no more than an ideological preference?
Answer: No, there was a lot more to it than that. In 1919 a Barvarian Soviet Republic existed, and the proto-nazi organization called the Thule society conspired in a coup against it. The Thule Society was comprised of volkish Germans and White Russian emigres, and the communists reacted by executing six of its leaders in cold blood. As this was done in a very similar manner to the slaughter of the Romanovs, it confirmed for many anti-communists that only a similar ruthlessness in Germany or Russia would ever work in opposing communism.
Unfortunately, the weakness in Germany’s propaganda explanation was that the Russian revolution had no justification at all. Originally that was the class conscious position of the White Russian royals in support of the early NSDAP. And in an effort to undermine a very real problem about Jewish stratification in Europe, any justification about the Jews in Russia’s Revolution was ignored.
Question: The United States provided Russia with an enormous amount of materiel aid through its Lend- Lease program, but the allies did not actually land in Normandy until after Germany had lost the major turning points of the war in the east, so could Stalin have won without them?
Answer: That’s such a speculative question that it’s best left for others, but it is interesting to note that the Red Army was also sometimes bogged down by the weather, and temporarily outran its own fuel supply by the time it arrived outside of Warsaw. Despite this, the Red army manged to kill four out of every five Germans killed in the war, though it sustained far greater losses to accomplish that. And that’s why the Russians held an unusually strong postwar bargining position at Posdam and Yalta.
Question: Whether WNs adhere to more mainstream values or some NS Weltanschauung, they usually agree that there was a big difference between the allied nations and the axis; so how is that difference explained from the PLE perspective?
Answer: To begin with, when any nation goes to war it’s showing some level of feral behavior, but what made Germany very different was a set of circumstances that were practically guaranteed to eventually bring that to a high temperature. Germany was starved during WW1, denied colonies to sustain its economy afterwards, partitioned from some of its most needed industries, divided from many of its people, starved again in the Great Depression, disrupted by Russia’s communist agents, and subjected to Jewish ethnic stratification (which even the founder of Zionism thought an enormous danger to his people).
Now common sense should tell anyone that that’s the formula for bringing someone unusual to power. Also, Hitler didn’t simply wish himself to power by some kind of magic, it was the German people who demanded that someone restore national dignity; getting the economy back on its feet and recovering all the parts of the nation taken away after WW1 under The Treaty of Versailles.
It is also important to point out that throughtout most of WW2 that, although Germany’s leadership appeared unified under Hitler, he was actually dependent on a much less stable alliance of National Socialists, royalists, generals, and business leaders. It was a very different set of circumstances than what went on in the United States, where Roosevelt didn’t have to constantly worry about plots by his own party associates, elites, military, and secret service to either overthrow or kill him.
Question: There are opponents of White Nationalism who say that there would be a similar risk of social instablity if PLEs emerge. Is that a well founded concern?
Answer: The existing type of White community isn’t a true community at all, and so we really have no choice but to raise up a new model (for culturally terraforming all White communities), but it’s an adventure that involves a different set of obstructions than anyone has ever been confronted with before.
The establishment and its media has long welcomed only the community profiles of non-Whites and gays, which certainly isn’t very democratic, and so there would be nothing innately evil about Whites gaining that same privilege. And there is every reason to believe it would promote stability.
On the other hand, let’s say the critics intend to get quite aggressive, doing everything possible to continue this nonsense about us living without the same rights guaranteed to them, or that we endure the ethnic domination of others (As the Palestinians do in Israel), I would predict that that will bring out the feral behaviors of a certain percentage of PLE supporters (though not all).
As a person who adheres to a sincere pro-White belief about the value of peaceful negotiation, however, and not a foreign tradition, I’ll add that the fewer feral behaviors we have to engage in the better for ourselves and our families.
by H. Michael Barrett for Stormfront
* The purpose of this article is to detail how, during the first half of the last turbulent century, Adolph Hitler journeyed from monarchism into a National Socialist alliance with his nobles, but then – unknown to most of the postwar world – evolved yet again in 1943 when he abandoned any publicly chauvinistic views about Slavs and the pre-Bolshevik Russian Revolution.
These things he endorsed by his own hand, eventually assisting a democratic Russian liberation movement. It is a remarkable story, but as it also adheres to history’s classical pattern of ETHNIC class changes in an often predictable direction, observers will not in the end be all that surprised.
The following closely related articles are also recommended reading:
‘The Secret Life of Earl Turner’ [url]http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t158126/[/url]
‘The Books of Dr. William Pierce’ [url]http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t46680/[/url]
And the Pierce Memorandum of 1970 [url]http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t141303/[/url]
operated a part time non-profit business, teaching emergency procedures to
various other property managers in that city’s financial district, and prepared
himself for that endeavor by personally completing all the classes required of
fire inspectors and half the curriculum offered by the San Francisco Police
Academy. Immediately after the 101 California mass murders of 1993, the head of
the bar association chose Mr. Barrett as the person best prepared to draw up and
lecture on a plan for their own employees to survive any similar terrorist
attack.
The following questions and answers examine the PLE (Pioneer Little Europe, an advocacy of actual Stormfronts of the street) building strategy within the context of Western Civilization:
Question: As there’s a distinct resemblance between PLEs and the “polis” or city-state of ancient Greece, judging by the emphasis placed on establishing communities with speakers forums, are PLEs intended to somehow mimic them?
Answer: Not really. The West constantly evolves its forms. PLEs are actually inspired by a close observation of how the competitors and opponents of Whites routinely eat up the living space of the existing type of White community. A PLE’s resemblance to a polis in ancient Greece merely confirms it’s the solution.
Question: Patrick Buchanan authored the pessimistically titled ‘The Death of the West.’ Is it really too late for us?
Answer: It’s the publishers who usually decide a book’s title, and so what Buchanan actually says in that book is the following:
“Traditionalists should emulate Roman converts. The empire still merited their allegiance, but they separated themselves from old comrades and customs and created a new Christian culture in their own families and within the fellowship of the converted.”
In other words, Buchanan’s view is that the present form of the West is dying but he recommends forming a new one.
Question: And how does the PLE plan line up with that?
Answer: Pioneer Little Europes are advocated as the seed of a future form of Western Civilization, but it’s still too early to know which traditional Christian values will be carried over.
Question: Buchanan has both feet firmly planted in the system, and isn’t a militant, so how does PLE compare on that aspect?
Answer: The only official militant creed in a PLE is its grassroots or local Legionism, which has both military-veteran and cultural forms. This acts as an umbrella tradition for all White Nationalists, whatever their personal beliefs about better or more radical alternatives.
Question: In 5th century BC Pericles created an enormous home for the gods on the Acropolis, and its center of attraction was the Parthenon that’s still there today, so what did Pericles have in his approach that we would find useful
Answer: Pericles went about things in a manner that could be compared to such successful American leaders as Long and Roosevelt (or even the more positive social building phase of Europe’s prewar fascisms and national socialism), as those projects on the Acropolis inspired people to work together. And PLEs will deliver similar results, as the energies and special values of our own people are released for a cultural revival.
[b]Question: Aren’t PLEs really too small scale for us, especially when compared to the power and grandeur of the Roman Empire?[/b]
Answer: At its high point Rome was impressive, but historians have also determined that it started as one little town. And who would ever have projected that the humble and impoverished followers of a religious sect would inherit it in its maturity?
[b]Question: In the PLE Prospectus there’s a statement that says “In the beginning was the word.” Was that particular PLE idea derived from the Judeo-Christian tradition or National Socialist Germany, as we see it in both?[/b]
Answer: That actually begins, appropriately, before the rise of Western Civilization. Thoth is an Egyptian god of letters (among other attributes), and represents the insight that society’s existence is dependent on a peculiar metaphysic of words and meanings. The Greeks called Thoth “Hermes Trismegistus.”
Later this insight shows up in the Jewish holiday story of Hannakah, where lights symbolize words and Jews are reminded that they must remain lit for Jewish survival. Then this shows up in the New Testament gospel of John, and Germany’s National Socialists repeat it early in the twentieth century.
The materials of a PLE culture shop, therefore, should include materials which lay a public claim on the White aspect of ancient Egypt and its culture.
[b]Question: You’ve said that the Old White community doesn’t fit the correct definition of an ETHNIC GROUP (as in race and culture), because it doesn’t maintain its territorial integrity, but that PLEs would fit the requirement by raising up an uncontrolled White Nationalist culture that repels outsiders. Is there a precedent anywhere for this more detailed approach to defining a community?[/b]
Answer: Yes, there is. The Oldest Japanese community in the continental United States is in San Francisco. Outsiders call that place Japantown, and many insiders translate Japan as [i]Nihon[/i] and town as [i]machi[/i]. But those who really know what it’s about say [i]Nihonjin machi[/i] which means Japanese people.
As Japantown is really an ethnic group and not merely a piece of real estate, when it began to falter financially and was in danger of dissolving, Mayor Newsom suggested that the area simply be zoned to exclude all non-Japanese.
[b]Question: As no mayor – liberal or otherwise – is probably going to seek zoning for Whites, and even most WN leaders aren’t making much of an effort at community building yet, how would PLEs survive without a similar level of cooperation or non-interference from the establishment?[/b]
Answer: PLEs would serve as vessels of a cultural revival, releasing an “uncontrolled White Nationalist culture” in the target area for all outsiders to voluntarily and legally flee.
[b]Question: Today’s political establishment leaves White people out in the rain, and PLEs are described as their “arks of survival,” but what does that actually mean?[/b]
Answer: It’s another hint that our survival strategy (PLE) is a modern extension of our heritage. And whether WNs are motivated by the biblical story about Noah and his family surviving a great flood, or of a very similar Greek story about Deucalion enduring when Zeus flooded the earth, White people need an ark.
It’s time to gather every resource into the PLE target area that will enable us to survive. That includes our most conscious men, women, and families, everything they normally needed before, and as many cultural revival products as they can generate in order to reach other Whites.
[url=http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=76053]What To Bring When Raising Up A PLE: – Stormfront[/url]
[b]Question: As PLE is actually “PLE-Legionism,” do any of the previous methods of defence in Western Civilization bear any resemblence to this modern strategy?[/b]
Answer: The Greeks often encouraged their opponents to battle them near their polis, as the support of its people and resources tended to tip the balance in their favor.
Unfortunately, all too many “modern Greek warriors” in White Nationalism registered their protests without bothering about community support (PLEs), believing that they could simply shock the Old White community into wakefulness. But the people these were willing even to die for didn’t have the kind of cultural preparation that would ever allow them to understand, so now those warriors sit in jail.
It is also worth mentioning, as PLEs are the vessels of a much needed cultural revival, that the Greco-Roman root of the word Legion means to gather.
An ancient relationship between those words allows us to place an emphasis on one or the other during PLE organizing, depending on whether it’s for militant or peaceful purposes.
An existing example of this in American culture is that any legal president of the United States is also the commander and chief of the armed forces. From the PLE perspective this is an acceptable extension of the legion idea into politics.
We recognize similar characteristics all across American culture; with a traditional American community gathering in all its Norman Rockwell familiarity being an acceptable form of “cultural legionism.” Many of our opponents understand this, and our people need to understand as well.
The opponents of Whites have frequently attempted to represent this peculiar arrangement as a form of fascism or national socialism, even making an issue of how similar symbols are utilized throughout US government, but “legionism” here has long been applied to very different circumstances and values.
[b]Question: Those militants you spoke of, who remain in jail because of a lack of community support, have political supporters who will also reject the military and cultural legion tradition of PLE organizing, but what would be the advantages in coming over to it?[/b]
Answer: To begin with, whether a person is militant, political, or culture oriented, they are invited to come as they are into a PLE.
Within the PLE the more militant are openly and legally invited to support the local PLE veteran’s post, which is the only approved “militant” front.
If they reject that, and some will, they can still establish themselves elsewhere (within or outside the PLE), but the PLE’s residents may be more inclined to criticize them.
On the other hand, those who choose the legion tradition, which Whites created and reclaim in the PLE as an ethnic creation, can more credibly claim that they have the authority to do whatever they need to do.
[b]Question: Can you provide a few examples on how an entire community becomes a form of resistance?[/b]
Answer: Beginning in the American Civil War, and much more routinely during World War 2, entire cities were destroyed when their civilians and resources were understood to be prolonging the war.
Then by the 1960s, when the strategies of the political/cultural/lifestyle community emerged during peacetime in the US, it was realized that even certain types of community cultures were capable of subtly overthrowing or repelling opponents.
And Black, homosexual, and Chinese communites continue to displace Old style White communities and expand in this manner. None are ever tripped up by civil rights legislation, even though they are obviously segregated, because their opponents simply don’t want to have anything to do with them.
This leaves White Nationalists with a decision to make: Shall they go on believing that someone or something is capable of stopping them from forming their own power centers (PLE commmunities), or will they see the opportunity to break out at last with this peculiar new strategy that promises so much.
Question: One of the first and provisional symbols for PLE was a stock design from Stormfront that was first associated with the Royal House of Spain’s presidio system, and later the 6th US Army in California. What’s does it mean to PLE people?
Answer: Spain’s first use of such militant communities, or presidios, began in Morocco in 1570. And there evolved various forms of them across Northern Mexico and California. The word presidio is derived from ancient Rome’s Latin word for a garrisoned place, praesidium. This is all largely symbolic in a PLE, as the only official militants are with the local veteran’s legion post.
Question: You’re an early advocate of something called “White Rights,” as is David Duke, but in all seriousness don’t you think Whites already have their rights?
Answer: You’re apparently referring to our “individual rights,” but what Whites urgently need the most is a restoration of their group or community rights.
Question: What’s the difference, and is it important?
Answer: For most of the history of Western Civilization there was an emphasis on group rights, then the emphasis on individual rights emerged in the early part of the sixteenth century. The individual rights revolution continued growing, and that was good, but by the 1950s it was ignorantly being extended to Blacks within our ethnic space.
That’s when the group or community rights of our people began collapsing. To grasp the significance of all this, imagine the reaction of the world if outsiders were to suddenly begin demanding “equal rights” within any Chinatown; including employment, joining social organizations, or purchasing real estate. That would more quickly be interpreted as a campaign of genocide.
Question: How do we know what the founding fathers intended?
Answer: When designing the Bill of Rights the founders drew most of their inspiration from the Roman Republic’s approximately five centuries (509 B.C. to 27 B.C. ), as they subscribed to what is called “classic republicanism,” a view holding a central principle about avoiding diversity.
That’s the observation that the more people have in common the better they will treat each other. The unwanted diversity could be classes, and certainly races if one accepts the evidence that the founding fathers owned slaves and clearly expressed that they were excluding native Indians in the Declaration of Independence. And until the American Civil war, even the supreme court routinely ruled that the documents of the founders were intended only for White people.
Question: Michael Novak, a highly celebrated Christian philosopher who’s contributed to National Review, says in his book ‘On Two Wings’ that, despite the separation of church and state on the surface of what America’s founding fathers advocated, that one entire wing of their inspiration was Judeo-Christian.
Nowak not only begins his book with that emphasis, but says that we’re still using those Judeo-Christian metaphysics today. Is this going to change with the rise of the PLEs, where a reborn or new type of White community comes into being?
Answer: To construct that two winged metaphysic Novak speaks of, the founding fathers drew from all across Western Civilization, and they saw those religious and non-religious values holding society together invisibly.
Additionally, what’s narrowly viewed as Judeo-Christian can actually be traced back to the community building contributions of the Egyptians, Babylonians, Sumerians, and Arabians, among others.
It’s very similar to the way Europeans only received the intellectual accomplishments of the Greeks after centuries of Arab custodianship, but we’re still a separate people from the Arabs or the Jews.Question: Why are PLE supporters (WNs, racially conscious Whites) asked to concentrate themselves within an area targeted for takeover within today’s obsolete type of White community?
Contrary to what’s widely accepted, the existing type of “White community” is an obsolete cultural form, and we need to raise up the next one, which will be racially conscious. The time tested way to do this is much like igniting a starter bundle of sticks and paper in the fire-place.
This is why Irish Nationalists concentrated themselves in Dublin between the 1890s and 1922, and why German Nationalists concentrated themselves in Munich in the 1920s. In fact, the latter made it even more formal and desigated actual “block organizers” which were the most prolific leadership positon in the NSDAP.
Question: Why do PLEs especially welcome in the “difficult and feral” WNs? And are there ideological sources for reading into this further?
ANSWER: We do it because it’s a rule of nature that whether a man is without a proper cultural home (a community) or a housecat is without the shelter of a human’s home, each will revert to a feral, hard, and unpredictable condition.
Today’s White person is an increasingly isolated individual who no longer has the benefit of a real ethnic community that holds living space. If a large number of the people who suffer the most from this collapse are concentrated into a target area, all the outsiders will voluntarily flee.
This will suddenly open up the opportunity for the most perceptive among them to raise up a racially conscious community in the target area, and to guide it in such a way as to culturally terraform all the rest of the White community.
Some of the best material for exploring this theme has come from philosopher John Locke, who was a key source for the founding fathers. Locke said that in a state of nature the individual was threatened, vulnerable, and selfish.
Other observers have added that an isolated person will often express themselves so egotistically that they become unbearable to be around. That includes even many White Nationalists in the political closet who identify with the obsolete type of White community and live without the conscious type of community, PLE, or Stormfront of the street.
And the little books of the modern longshoreman-philosopher Eric Hoffer – especially the Ordeal of Change and the True Believer – are also useful. Hoffer viewed the nonconformists and misfits as the the mainspring of change.
H. Michael Barrett
References:
Adcock, F.E. ‘The Greek and Macedonian Art of War’ Berkeley, California: University of California Press 1957
Moorhead. Max ‘The Presidio – Bastion of the Spanish Borderlands’ Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press 1975
Veale, F. J. P. ‘Advance to Barbarism – The Development of Total Warfare.’ Newport Beach, California: Institute for Historical Review 1948-93
Buchanan, Patrick J. ‘The Death of the West – How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization’ NY, NY: St. Martin’s Press 2002
Uncredited Author ‘History of San Francisco Japantown – 1906 to 2006’ San Francisco, California: S. F. Examiner Newspaper May 19, 2006 pg. 29
Barnes, Harry Elmer ‘An Intellectual and Cultural History of the Western World’ (in Three Volumes) New York, New York: Dover Publications 65
Kemp, Arthur ‘The Children of Ra: Artistic, Historical, and Genetic Evidence for Ancient White Egypt’ :CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform 2013
Gabrile, Richard A. ‘Jesus the Egyptian – The Origins of Christianity and the Psychology of the Christ’ iUniverse 2005
Charles Quigley & Duane Smith (editorial directors and staff) ‘With Liberty And Justice for All – The Story of the Bill of Rights, Calabasas, Ca: Center for Civic Education 1993
Novak, Michael ‘On Two Wings – Humble Faith and Common Sense at the American Founding’ San Francisco, California: Encounter Books 2003
Hanson, Victor Davis ‘Carnage and Culture – Landmark Battles In The Rise of Western Power’ New York, New York: Random House 2001
[b]”I believe you are trying to do away with the British Empire,” Churchill once told him ([i]Roosevelt[/i]) in private. Of this there is no doubt. “The colonial system means war,” Roosevelt had confided to his son Elliott.
John Toland, on page 51 of ‘The Last 100 Days'[/b]
As an American populist (And not one who’s actually something else and just saying that) I’m not a particularly big booster of Europe’s nobility, though their present role as figureheads and charity promoters is generally in line with my values. I enjoyed the last royal wedding, and have a souvenir cup to remember it.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQmgrF-69pk”%5DRoyal wedding video: Prince William and his bride Kate enjoy first royal wedding day kiss – YouTube[/url]
And so tonight I was perusing a watch and jewelry catalog, the latest from Timepieces International. And I happened to notice quite a glitzy ring on their page 66 for the ladies of the masses that’s inspired by an original worn by the Duchess of Windsor, just as there are already copies of the Diana/ Kate ring.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdJaURVZ7uI”%5DThe Uncrowned Jewels – 1987 BBC News Documentary – YouTube[/url]
As many of you know, that’s the late Wallis Simpson, the National Socialist sympathizer. Her relationship to Edward the VIII led to marriage and cost him the throne, at least that’s the superficial story that the more mainstream British media tells to this day – though historians know much more – to avoid highlighting controversies about class conflict.
Much of the Duchess’s story was detailed out by her biographer, her friend and neighbor Lady Diana Mitford Mosley. Even that version, however, avoided the central issue, when the big question of the last century was which class was going to resolve the economic crisis of each European nation.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjzEP0S50cM&feature=youtu.be”%5DLady Diana Mosley pt.1 – YouTube[/url]
A former British National Socialist who became an advocate for European unity, along with her husband Sir Oswald Mosley, Diana is probably better known for having been a part of Hitler’s inner social circle before the war. For unlike her husband, she already spoke German in those years. Diana’s sister, Unity Mitford, was also part of that circle.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9kBH47Ohlg&list=PLAD2E7709B79FD557″%5DHITLER’S BRITISH GIRL (1/5) – YouTube[/url]
In the early 1970s, when I was still somewhat obsessive about the war, I was regularly exchanging letters with Lady Mosley. And exchanging letters with Adelide Pearson Pelley as well; the daughter of the late William Dudley Pelley, the populist leader of America’s Silver Shirts Legion.
Adelide’s dad had authored a social plan to compete with Roosevelt’s own campaign against the “economic royalists,” a book titled ‘No More Hunger.’
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXSI79sIJlU”%5Dpelly and the silver shirts – YouTube[/url]
During this correspondence, and with the innocence of youth, I asked if she’d like a copy of Diana’s book ‘The Duchess of Windsor.’ Adelide was absolutely taken back, and with a still charming American directness said “You’ve got to be kidding.” And, “We’re really not on the same wavelength about this issue at all.”
It was at that moment that I first came to realize that some cult interests (As they require no critical thinking) were just head on collisions; as some of my contacts leaned more toward the traditional wealthy elites during the war, even fawned over them (Be sure to see the photo below of Hitler being absolutely star-struck as he meets the Kaiser’s son), while others would have been more inclined to apply a few well aimed shots in their direction. [url]https://www.google.com/search?site=&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=643&q=hitler+meets+the+kaiser%27s+son&oq=hitler+meets+the+kaiser%27s+son&gs_l=img.12…2898.14143.0.16964.33.9.2.22.24.0.279.779.8j0j1.9.0.msedr…0…1ac.1.64.img..20.13.779.jjVnqGMrEqE#tbm=isch&q=hitler+fawns+over+the+kaiser%27s+son&imgrc=5_Nn9J-c8kTs3M%253A%3BzZ5iP1BBP1TBtM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.historyplace.com%252Fworldwar2%252Friseofhitler%252Fhitler-prince.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.historyplace.com%252Fworldwar2%252Friseofhitler%252Fdictator.htm%3B400%3B331[/url]
As the masses of that time were widely distrustful of the nobility, if not already supportive of a Marxist revolution, Hitler adopted a public posture of being critical and cold to the nobility, while privately engaging them as a largely invisible umbrella for international diplomacy and fundraising.
The Kaiser accepted that this deception was necessary, so he did not flee his post-revolutionary residence in the Netherlands even after Germany’s invasion. Britain extended an invitation for him to do so, but that would only have made him vulnerable to prosecution as an alleged war criminal. And when he passed away, the German military sent an honor guard with swastika decorated flags to his estate.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5OI5NC_WC8″%5DThe Last German Emperor, Living in Exile in The Netherlands 1918-1941 – YouTube[/url]
I had discovered that the third way solutions offered after WW1 during the crisis of capitalism, including the Mosley and Pelley personality cults, weren’t really one big convenient stereotype, though their opponents thought otherwise. As such, I decided to find out what this especially intriguing mystery and often neglected controversy had been about in its time.
What many still do not know today, is that when Edward VIII relinquished the British throne it effectively smoke-screened a much more important turning point in history; involving Britain’s democratic politicians, its aristocrats, and Germany’s Adolf Hitler.
In all cases, none of the parties involved were inclined to speak very directly about it to the masses; therefore those mysterious hints in the film ‘The Battle of Britain’ where the dialogue of the Germans occasionally suggests that Britain wasn’t really viewed by Hitler as the natural enemy. That needs clarifying, however, because it especially meant that Britain’s traditional ruling elite wasn’t viewed as the natural enemy
The outcome for the democratically elected politicians was that the abdication discreetly resolved behind the curtain that no King would be dictating key parts of the nation’s foreign and domestic social policies, not now, not ever, for a more modern age had brought that question to a showdown.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1ZPchVWPbY”%5DTheir Royal Heilness – credit The Sun – YouTube[/url]
The democratic leaders (And I say that in a limited sense when referring to the British or American systems) would take Britain out of an economy based on past living space conquests, an approach Hitler had so admired about the British and wished to emulate, and into the open and connected economy that the Americans were advocating (Though it has it’s controversies too).
At first Winston Churchill stood with the King, though that left him aligned with the fascist Oswald Mosley and all his friends hidden in the House of Lords (The un-elected but sometimes self-described “leadership class”), and there had been talk of forming a King’s Party.
In fact, Churchill had already authored not only a large article describing the Bolshevik Revolution against the Russian nobility as looking quite Jewish, but also a chapter to a book where he described Hitler as an appropriate leader for Germany, despite that rather unfortunate but necessary incident with the Brownshirt leadership. After all, he pointed out, there weren’t all that many people killed.
But then Churchill suddenly decided it was more prudent to back off during the Abdication Crisis, and he came to accept that the old order really was about to come down a few notches. He had no intention of letting his political fortunes go down with it. And Churchill had indeed adjusted his public pronouncements to the new ruling class more aggressively flexing its muscles in Parliament.
Hitler would eventually made a very similar ideological accommodation to the Russian Revolution – just over three and a half months after elements of his own nobility tried to assassinate him. On November 14, 1944, when it was obvious that Russia wasn’t going to be colonized by a German dictatorship backed by most of its traditional elite, he quietly signed a document in front of SS witnesses approving the ‘KNOR Manifesto.’
This advocated a democratic program for the Russians based on a non-Bolshevik interpretation of the Russian Revolution. And there was no longer any allegation about the Jews devaluing this turning point in history for the advocates of a more moderate though slower path to industrialization than Stalin was pursuing. Reference: Steenberg, Sven ‘Vlasov’ New York, New York: Alfred A Knopf 1970 pg. 157
[i]Marxists tend to apply a certain dictum to such processes, “The ruling ideas of any epoch are the ideas of its ruling class,” but the original inspiration can be credited to Hegel. [url]https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t799052/[/url] [/i]
[url=”http://www.amazon.com/Decline-Fall-British-Aristocracy/dp/0375703683/ref=sr_1_24?ie=UTF8&qid=1439368436&sr=8-24&keywords=oswald+mosley”%5DThe Decline and Fall of the British Aristocracy: David Cannadine: 9780375703683: Amazon.com: Books[/url]
[i]In postwar pseudo-National Socialism (An advocacy of a stagnant non-Volksgemeinschaft or non-community NS cultism) these adjustments by Churchill, and later by Hitler, were both neglected. Churchill’s change of mind went unexplained even when George Lincoln Rockwell reprinted Churchill’s commentary on the Bolshevik Revolution. And Hitler’s transition into post-colonialism went totally unnoticed.[/i]
In Britain the social welfare would have to be left until after the war, if a war really was coming. So the King departed to Austria, without any official questioning of his patriotism, received financial support from the government, relocated to the Bahamas to serve the nation – where he’d obviously be out of touch with his friends – and retired to France afterwards.
One of Mosley’s right hand men, Harold Nicolson, also adopted Churchill’s new direction, and eventually he was appointed by Churchill to lead the war ministry. Charles Lindbergh later took up residence in Nicolson’s home, and after personally observing a Mosley rally, said it wasn’t for him.
The outcome of the abdication crisis for Hitler had been that his secret alliance with nobles all across Europe (Which included Hermann Goring’s wife Carin) didn’t include Edward the VIII, whose geopolitical restraint would have greatly facilitated Germany’s invasion of West Poland, to populate it with ethnic Germans, and Russia, to acquire vast resources that would have made Germany a superpower to rival the US.
And just as Germany had already obstructed British colonialism in Ireland, supplying arms to the rebels, the rivalry between nations inclined Churchill and many others to support the idea of obstructing Germany’s plan to recover Poland.
And just as Ireland’s President Éamon de Valera paid tribute to Churhill as a great Englishman but could not forebear from describing him also as “a dangerous enemy of the Irish people,” any greatness associated with Hitler will be reduced by his own threat to Polish self-determination.
Hitler’s preferred foreign policy would have been to have Britain’s ruling class as an ally, Russia as an opponent, and German diplomacy was left to the nobleman (by adoption) Joachim von Ribbentrop.
Hitler was relying on Ribbentrop, not the other way around, and so the moment Ribbentrop’s efforts resulted in a general war over the issue of Poland, Hitler was astonished. And witnesses remember him turning to Ribbentrop, and asking: What now?
The transition between the ruling classes happened very quickly in Britain, and was quietly decided behind the scenes, but while the war was raging in Poland Rudolf Hess made his flight to Scotland. He thought Britain’s traditional ruling class could still decide the foreign policy, but he was mistaken.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ya00Tphwwic”%5DUnsolved Mysteries – WORLD WAR 2 – The Riddle of Rudolph Hess – PART 3/3 – YouTube[/url]
During the Battle of Britain Churchill led his countrymen into signing a “Lend Lease” agreement with the United States. But anyone inspecting the small print can also discern that it’s part of an agreement for Britain (facing a hardball opportunism from the US) to eventually phase out the colonization business and to more effectively deal with a German leader who believed that old style expansion across East Europe had a future.
[i]Although this was the direction history was taking, the evidence that it was more about the expansion of American business interests rather than a completely dealistic campaign of decolonialism, can clearly be seen in what would happen after the war:
In 1946, when the French seized Viet Nam in the name of renewed colonialism, the United States approved and armed the French. This had the effect of actually further radicalizing the Vietnamese patriot Ho Chi Minh, an admirer of the American Declaration of Independence.
American business later succeeded French colonialism, but as a temporary surrogate of colonialism it obstructed free elections rather than risk any threat to the traditionally privileged, those who owned most of the country. That brought continuing horrors and the Vietnam War, and remarkably, was similar to the decision to buck the Zeitgeist that had already brought Germany so much anguish.[/i]
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poVbzyjk1-4″%5DDUKE OF COBURG HITLER´S FAVORITE ROYAL PART 1 – YouTube[/url]
Hitler practiced a style of governing largely intended to substitute for a more visual monarchy, and there were hints of it throughout the party decorations.
But his economy was still a shade more democratic, and more modern, than the Kaiser’s was, as the German people were to become an extended part of the privileged elite over all other Europeans.
The substitutions offered a continuity that wasn’t a hard thing to sell either, as Germans had never really experienced democracy to its roots even during the Weimar years, as the nobility and the General Staff were in a position to obstruct anyone who took all that too seriously.
And the loss of the connection to Edward VIII, with Diana Mosley in a key diplomatic role (Just as her husband’s family had traditionally served that role for a previous British king), was a disappointment to Hitler and the nobles who had been pressuring him to launch a colonizing campaign to the east since the early 1920s.
Lady Mosley downplayed her own pre-war diplomatic role, which wasn’t successful anyway, and given the hostile postwar climate for her views that was necessary. Her safety was also enabled by the victors; for even the transcript of personal conversations between Hitler and Edward after he gave up the throne in 1936 – as Lady Mosley also recounts in her book – vanished from the captured war time files (during the campaign to quietly recover the nobles).
Yes, the nobility and a Russian invasion had been at the back of Hitler’s mind since those earliest days of the NSDAP, when the party paraded for a very revealing first time in Coburg on October 14 & 15, 1922, where the Romanov claimants to the Russia throne had retreated to live on an estate near the German nobility.
These claimants, endorsed by the NSDAP, were Kirill and Viktoria Ramanov. And they knew the value of influencing German foreign policy as soon as possible. Kirill had his own fortune and his connection to Henry Ford to back the NSDAP. And Viktoria, closely related to British royalty, drew from her assets in Britain. (Ref: page 157 The Russian Roots of National Socialism by Michael Kellog Published by Cambridge University Press, UK in 2005.)
As this area of inquiry lacks the wider selection of materials it deserves because of an intentional neglect by the vested interests, who were responsible for the closing of royal archives to researchers all across Europe, I’ll include this title as well: ‘Royals & The Reich’ by Jonathan Petropoulos, Oxford University Press, UK, 2006[/i]
[i]Additionally, while the European masses weren’t reading a lot into the matter, Coburg is also the ancestral home of the British royal family Saxe Coburg-Gotha, more often referred to as Windsor. And on page 144 Lady Mosley recounts that the Duke of Saxe Coburg and Gotha was sent to King Edward VIII with confidential messages from Hitler.[/i]
Reference Mein Kampf for the day of the first party parade in Coburg, on “German Day,” and you’ll quickly notice that the people who invited Hitler to come in strength for such an extraordinary occasion are casually left unnamed. This was the “secret royal event” that resulted in the party’s first campaign badge.
This was also the first day that the NSDAP publicly paraded its flag, which employed the red, white, and black colors of the German monarchy – with a swastika in the middle. And what the swastika really meant in the early years of the NSDAP, despite a popular interpretation to this day, is revealed clearly by connecting three closely occurring NSDAP events:
* The swastika flag was officially adopted by Hitler’s NSDAP August 7, 1920 at the Salzburg Congress.
* In the September 1920 issue of the Volkischer Beobachter (Volkisch Observer), there appeared a story written by an NSDAP foreign advisor, Shabelskii-Bork, who had once served as an official investigator into the murder of the Romanov’s in the Yekaterinburg basement.
The details, which were certainly known even earlier in the party, included a mention of the swastika that the Czarina secretly etched on an upstairs window ledge, when there was still a hope of her family being rescued. The article also recounted that a book she had been reading included ‘The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion within its cover,’ which alleged that there was a Jewish conspiracy to take over the world.
* And during the NSWPP’s Coburg March on October 14 & 15, 1922, the flag was prominently displayed publicly for the first time.
The swastika was the Cazarina’s personal sign, it adorned her diary as well (Available on Amazon), and soon became a compelling symbol for many about wreaking a merciless vengence upon the Bolsheviks for what they had done.
Soon after the story appeared, the VB became the NSDAPs official organ. And although most of Hitler’s dependence on White Russian emigres ended with the unsuccessful Putsch, and turned more decisively to soliciting the support of German nobles, he saw no reason to abandon the swastika.
And remarkably, despite all of this being publicly documented in English, German, Russian, and many other languages, it’s rare to encounter anyone even today who’s conscious of this especially significant connection to the swastika, rather than the countless other associations covered in the following video:
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4PRRS2NGRc”%5DThe True History & Story of The Swastika Symbol. – YouTube[/url]
Coburg had also been, it is especially important to grasp, the place for royalist plots since the ambitious Prince Albert first set his sights on Queen Victoria. He intended to produce enough children of their own master race to be distributed by marriage into all the European power centers. Reference: ‘The Coburg Conspiracy’ by Richard Sotnick: Ephesus Publishing, UK 2008
[i]That “master race” concept offered centuries of tradition to validate it, and was a far cry from the often impoverished and frequently mixed race people who so often present their countenances on behalf of today’s non-community (or non-Volksgemeinschaft building) NS bachelor cults. [/i]
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roZhbBoHGm8″%5DVictoria and Albert: Part 1 – YouTube[/url]
That plan largely succeeded after Albert’s death because Victoria remained loyal to it, and it lasted until the blood relations fell out with each other. Then the carnage of WW1 began and continued until there was widespread social disorder; including in Russia and later in Germany.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7kp3vf1uKA”%5DOrigins of World War I (1 of 2) – YouTube[/url]
That’s when both the Russian and German nobility retreated behind the political curtain, along with the German General staff and its secret service, while the communists and the democratic forces competed and fought in the streets for what they thought would be the leadership of the masses.
But soon the nobility was financially backing political alternatives on the right that held them in much higher esteem, those who were interested in picking up exactly where the WW1 dictatorship of Erich Ludendorff and colonization in East Europe had left off.
In 1919 Ludendorff had already played a key role in artificially inserting Lenin into a destabilized Russia, as Lenin was willing to take Russia out of WW1 and fulfilled that promise. It is apparently unknown if any of the countless Jews among the Bolsheviks thanked Ludendorff for his help.
But despite that absolutely amazing art of political puppetry, the German General staff wasn’t very happy when Bolshevism eventually spread to Germany anyway, challenging the ancien régime there too. Many Jews are experts at fanning even the most painful Zeitgeist, and although historians usually neglect to focus on him enough, so was Ludendorff.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frjt452YzkM”%5DFall of Eagles – Sealed Train Decision (9m) – YouTube[/url]
Then following World War 1, it is important to notice, Ludendorff is seen assisting Hitler in very similar circumstances of social disorder before 1923. Yes, he asserted he was in retirement, but there are indicators that he was actually working with the secret service in an effort to do the very same thing again!
The evidence is that he brought along his most brilliant secret service agents and financial contacts to quietly nurture the NSDAP. These were mostly drawn from East Europe at the conclusion of WW1. And symbolically, the party was soon supplied with the exact same brown shirts that had once been delegated to the last colonizing (& genocide) effort by Germany in West Africa.
The Ludendorff faction would have assured the nobility and the General Staff that Hitler would be Germany’s ideal man to lead the masses. As a gifted speaker he had faithfully taken on even the most unpleasant tasks. And the advisors of the Russia aristocrats educated Hitler on the need to eventually go East, when the time was right.
Hitler was also provided with one of Germany’s most effective secret agents, Dr. Max Erwin von Scheubner-Richter, who had become a noble through marriage. His biographer described him as Germany’s equivalent to Lawrence of Arabia. In Mein Kampf Hitler describes him as the only man among the fallen he could not replace. Scheubner-Richter was also the political leader of the White Russian elite which had taken refuge with their German cousins.
And although the Ludendorff / Hitler attempt at a Putsch failed in 1923, by 1933 Hitler was legally elected. And when a controversy about the faithfulness of many Brownshirt leaders erupted in 1934, Hitler demonstrated to the supportive aristocrats of the army that they had indeed chosen wisely.
The following link will take you to a PLE article that details it all in painstaking detail, because it’s very important to understand that the World Wars were not ordinary contests between the nations of Europe – something one can just re-fight for a different outcome – but a sometimes hidden contest for the masses that even the communists could not discern properly.
[url]https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1063936/[/url]
In fact, Hitler could sound so authentically left wing, much as he would mimic a host of characters for his guests, that when the critical moment came the Marxists turned their attention to opposing the more familiar advocates of a modern democracy instead.
And it’s vital to know, even during postwar de-Nazification by the Allied powers, that this controversy about the nobility was intentionally downplayed in front of the masses. In fact, it’s rare to see anyone or any resource mention it today.
[url]https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1063935/[/url]
Essentially what all this means is that the fascists and the National socialists of Europe were in a low profile alliance with the key players of European nobility. That began well before the war, and continued throughout the alliance’s successful years. It comprised a second daring effort from Coburg, and with many centuries of experience they were confident of success.
In Italy, for example, King Emmanuel was already being advised by fascist intellectuals well before Mussolini’s “March on Rome,” which wasn’t as much a seizure of power as a planned public spectacle that gave the King the opportunity to say: ” I had no choice but to give in to the dictatorship”
And after the war, as the victors fully intended to absorb the wealth and status of the nobility into their own systems, their newsreels produced for the common folk emphasized everything except the nobility.
That adventure, though it was only visible in the intentionally small print of the Nuremberg Trials, was officially referred to as “de-nobilization.” A more honest term for the latter, however, would have been reorganized-nobilization, as there was never an attempt to completely dismantle or outlaw them in the same manner as their National Socialist partners (or middle men) in power, rather, the goal was to realign with them.
Additionally, and this is one of the most amazing and mysterious details: In the last days of the war the massive NSDAP membership list wasn’t even destroyed (Though the names of supporting nobles who were not party members had always been handled discreetly).
This also diverted attention – whether intentional or not by those responsible – away from many powerful people.
Yes, there had been an order directly from Hitler to destroy all those records, as the files were entrusted to an unnamed military officer (whether he was a noble or not isn’t recorded) to be destroyed by pulping at a local mill.
For nine days the trucks rolled into the mill with the membership files, information on more than 8 million people, with an identifying photo attached, and weighing over fifty tons. But the officer didn’t stay around to verify their fate, which was entrusted to the manager, a non-party civilian named Herr Hubner. And eventually he gave it all to the allies.
For the party, as an entity quite different from the rest of Germany, the betrayal was a devastating blow leaps and bounds beyond any other political set-back it had ever experienced, including the Night of the Long Knifes or the later defection of many nobles; for all those names were like throwing the full catch as bloodied bait for all the circling sharks.
And though the damage sustained by the party far exceeded those setbacks combined, neither the allies nor the “post-war National Socialists” with shoestring budgets and vast ambitions generally tended to highlight it.
They jointly embraced a more distracting history of the NSDAP, though it didn’t really add up for the less gullible, a mere skeleton of truth that operates like this:
* Hitler appears to come to power in a miracle of personal political mastery. Or does he? Over on the left, with many decades to examine that turning point, many have become quite clear on the actual circumstances that bested them. In his ‘A People’s History of the World,’ this is what Chris Harman’s critique of his fellow Marxists says:
[i]What gave the Nazis power was the decision by key representatives of the ruling class to hand it to them. There had long been sections of big business which gave money to the Nazis, seeing them as a useful counterweight to the left and the unions.
The newspaper magnate Hugenburg had relieved Hitler’s financial dilemmas in his early years. By 1931 Fritz Thyssen, a leading Ruhr industrialist, was ‘a keen Nazi supporter,’ and the former national bank chief Schacht was increasingly sympathetic.[/i]
And Chris Harman doesn’t include this, and obviously countless other details that would confirm the matter, but even the head of the Kaiser Wilhelm Society was aboard long before Hitler came to power.
The KWS was able to offer an extensive list of social planning departments. But with most of its other political records destroyed by 1945, many still prefer to believe that the regime’s complete reorganization of society spawned narrowly from Mein Kampf and Hitler staying up late at night to brainstorm with his intimates.
* The Röhm-Strasser Purge, involving all those “typically corrupt” and now allegedly conspiratorial peasants, receives a lot of emphasis, while little or no emphasis is placed on these observations: That Hitler meets with the munitions maker Krupp immediately before and is told to clean this up.
Nor is the observation that Prince Christoph accompanied Goring throughout the campaign of arrests and executions deemed significant, or that Goering’s own genealogy included princes, queens, and other nobility since the twelfth century (Nuremberg Interviews by Leon Goldensohn Knopf / Doubleday 2007 pg. 105)
Nor is much said of the class nature of the SS, the force which went in to settle the Brownshirt controversy, though industrialists occupied many of its highest positions. Himmler’s first name, Heinrich, was that of his godfather, Prince Heinrich of Bavaria, a member of the royal family of Bavaria,
[i]And near the end of the war something similar to this happens again, when Hitler sent Himmler to the east the big estates of Pomerania receive almost all his protection. This allowed the nobility to evacuate, and the Russians opted for the easier drive on Berlin. The rapes, murders, tortures, and pillaging against ordinary Germans soon followed, but innocent observers opined that Himmler just wasn’t a good tactician.[/i]
* During the Count von Struffenberg plot – even with aristocratic titles showing up left, right, and center in any traditional telling – there’s actually no emphasis on the aristocrats being all that unified in revolt. Hitler, however, was actually so rocked that he passed emergency legislation to specifically curtail their privileges as his diplomatic network over Europe. But he does not completely cast them out, as this hidden face of the German establishment was too entwined with everything the party had ever done.
* The mysteriously convenient use of the NSDAP files for all the war crimes trials is almost never mentioned anywhere either, nor the reason the private records of the NSDAP leaders were so often recovered for the allied prosecutors only after the trail passed through the estates or castles of the nobility. These included 47 crates of files from Alfred Rosenberg, the philosopher of National Socialism, which were found concealed under the castle of nobleman Baron Kurt von Behr, his “chief aid.” But even the Internet offers very little information on him.
The allies took the breathtaking gift of the NSDAP membership files, with its 8 million plus supporters and years of explanatory details, and produced punched cards. Then they fed the information into one of the world’s first computers. An extensive reference on this event is Fredrick Taylor’s ‘Exorcising Hitler,’ published in 2011 by Bloomsburg Press, New York.
In the case of the nobility, whom the allies were a lot less informed about unless a person was actually on the party membership list – and hundreds were, most were viewed as untarnished.
And this is why so many Nuremberg judges and lawyers, if they held enough social status themselves, attended the parties of the nobility even while the trials were in progress; for the vast estates in the undisturbed tranquility of the countryside, and the international investments of the nobility, were not erased by the destruction.
These gatherings presented opportunities for the hosts to ask the masters of the law, if they were inclined to ask, to do whatever they could to save this or that National Socialist leader from too punishing a sentence, whether incarceration or death; serving as character witnesses in the wings. The Faber-Castell family, for example, traditionally welcomed whoever was in control.
And when the war was over, they were free to contact blood relations even in the democratic nations about applying some heat to someone’s backside. A great favorite of the nobility, for example, was Albert Speer.
Speer’s arrest took place at Schloss Glucksburg castle in Schleswig-Holstein, a German state near the border to Denmark. The castle was built in a lake by Nikel Karies, between 1583 and 1587 for Duke Johann the Younger of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXy6W9y8AiA”%5DSchloss Glücksburg Water Castle Palace FPV 2014 – YouTube[/url]
King Christian IX of Denmark was the first King to take up residence there. He has been called the father-in-law of Europe, as four of his children married into the Royal houses of Sweden, England and Russia. A son and grandson became kings of Greece and Norway respectively.
Descendants of this especially well connected branch of international royalty were still in residence at the time of Speer’s arrest in their home, but it’s rare to see any mention of that in all the press accounts issued over the decades. And eventually Speer was free, despite being being very deeply involved in the war and among Hitler’s closest confidants.
According to Smithsonian.com, during Speer’s interrogation there by Paul Nitze he explained how he had reduced the influence of the military and the Nazi Party in decision-making, and how he had substituted Henry Ford’s more modern manufacturing principles to run the factories efficiently.
However, many higher ranking NSDAP members, who had so loyally served the nobles and only entertained ideas of completely supplanting them in the last and losing days of the war, received a harsh punishment, while the allies quietly let even tarnished nobility out the back door.
But why, anyone with any curiosity might ask, hadn’t Hitler in 1945 entrusted the NSDAP’s membership files – along with proper funding – either to the Schutzstaffel (abbreviated as SS), wartime Werwolves, or some other agency bursting with enthusiasm for a postwar revival of the party?
The Reich had, for example, sent weapons technology to Japan, wealth to Switzerland, refugees to Spain, Argentina, and countless other safe havens. But the NSDAP files were slated for complete destruction. Arthur Axmann, for example, received little more than Hitler’s personal sidearm.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYyWDcpPPKc”%5DHitler’s Final Moments – YouTube[/url]
As you will see, this is not much of a mystery: Hitler would have recognized that an ancient way of life, predicated on absolute obedience to one person physically expanding the empire, was passing away decisively, though he had temporarily revived that type of economy for a last hurrah in a somewhat more modern form. The best thing to do with the now obsolete membership files, which had a percentage of visible aristocrats woven into them, was to destroy all them in the interest of everyone’s safety.
Additionally, signalling a need to return to a semi-democratic arrangement in Germany as well, Hitler’s Last Will And Testement reverted to a Weimar style arrangement for appointments:
Yes, Admiral Karl Döenitz would become the Staatsoberhaupt (Head of State), with the titles of Reichspräsident (President) and Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces; but Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels would be the Head of Government with the title of Reichskanzler (Chancellor). Goebbels served only one day and commit suicide.
[i]Goebbels’ siblings transferred the rights to his writings to Swiss banker François Genoud, who, prior to his death in 1996, transferred the rights to Cordula Schacht. Her father, Hjalmar Schacht, was Adolf Hitler’s economics minister in the 1930s The controversies about what’s actually supposed to be in them, and what’s not, have continued to this day.[/i] [url=http://fpp.co.uk/bookchapters/JG/index.html]Real History and Dr Joseph Goebbels[/url]
And to highlight that this would actually be a more modern government than Weimar, despite the wasteland of bricks and bomb crater holes in the streets, the nobility’s representatives at Hitler’s side, Göring and Himmler, were expelled.
The results in a modern war had turned out badly, as colonial economies tend not to coordinate their attacks in the manner that connected economies do. The allies found the results conducive to denying that there had ever been any legitimacy or rationality to National Socialism.
But Hitler’s authority was actually legally sustained by not only the Weimar Constitution, and the Enabling Act of March 23, 1933, but other laws as well. And although the political system of that time still retained a medieval footing, his rule was still more democratically endorsed than the Kaiser’s rule had been.
The allies also kept the NSDAP’s history and the nobility’s history separated when possible, classifying much as top secret, though in reality the uneasy relationship overlapped and intertwined throughout the history of the NSDAP. The Nuremberg Trials were selective, and permitted the masses to see a public show of heads rolling.
The manufactured legend of Hitler the outsider soon became the edited myth of Hitler the social outcast, and the Soviets provided a corresponding view of Hitler as a leader who emerged from the Lumpen Proletariat (worse part of the working class).
This would nip in the bud anything that might boost the impression among the Russian people that this war had in any shape or form been about a revival of the nobility’s prospects.
And when a Soviet book on Hitler was constructed for Stalin, it is important to notice that it left out virtually anything of significance about the NSDAP in its White Russian phase, everything from 1919 until the attempted Putsch of 1923 (And for some reason, everything until 1933 as well).
As Stalin was a student of history, he may have known that the French Revolution had also required being won twice; first internally, then by repelling outside forces intent on restoring the old order.
And while defeat decided a very important economics question, that the age of colonialism and dictatorship was over for most of Western Europe, the drama of Hitler’s lost agenda complicated all his other social questions as well; for much had been dovetailed or spun to fit that long range agenda.
And there’s a difference, which usually goes unnoticed even by the most astute opponents who prefer consistencies, between the portrait of the Jews provided by Hitler and his designated philosopher, Rosenberg.
Hitler’s view is more agenda driven, so his uncompromising propaganda picks up exactly where the Romanovs left off, while Rosenberg applies a more intellectual or candid signature, suggesting that if the Jews hadn’t existed that the world would have had to invent them.
Germany’s colonial agenda had required the making of a hierarchy of White nationalities as well; those fit for ruling and those fit only for being ruled. But the war had awakened long slumbering national aspirations, and this became part of the momentum which caused Germany to withdraw. That would also contribute, decades later, to the rapid withdrawal of Bolshevism.
Any future social questions would have to be left to a new type of man (and woman, as is said in our own time), leading a movement quite different from the NSDAP, but being especially conscious of what it really was all about in its own time.
The loss of the war brought enormous changes to the German economy and the class interactions within it. The Soviets, for example, eventually broke up the many massive estates held by single owners all across East Prussia. These estates had been as big as many state parks in the US, and occasionally were the gifts Hitler bestowed on generals who successfully expanded the living space.
And even when the Soviet vision of a worker’s paradise failed, and the Russians withdrew as well, those now more modestly sized properties in many more hands offered perfect kindling to spread the already roaring West German economy. And Germany, at least from an economic stance, increased it’s influence over Europe again.
The Western allies thought they were being practical, but erred disastrously when they outlawed the legal concept of the German community as somehow suspect. It was actually a proto-National Socialist concept, little different to respecting the boundaries of any ethnic national community in the world. And because of the blunder, Germans were left without a normal legal footing when a flood of immigrants began to colonize them.
But temporarily the allies left National Socialist currency circulating in their postwar world, approved for permanent use countless well thought out National Socialist laws all across the nation; including some especially important international agreements. And in legal controversies about the wealth still in the hands of the families of prominent National Socialsts, sometimes the decisions went in their favor. [url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edda_G%C3%B6ring#/media/File:Image_of_an_adult_Edda_G%C3%B6ring,_daugther_of_Hermann_G%C3%B6ring.gif[/url]
They also welcomed many former National Socialists into the founding of what became the European Union; because Germany already had much more experience than any other nation with laying the bare bones of such a connected economy more narrowly on the continent during the war.
A long list of former National Socialist philosophers were also eventually re-engaged with the new establishment’s academia, including Martin Heidegger, though many still weren’t sure what he was saying. And Carl Schmitt, who had been Hitler’s top jurist, picked up a very strong following internationally; including many of America’s key decision makers.
[url=http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/archive/index.php/t-452543.html]Is any Third Reich legislation still in force? [Archive] – Straight Dope Message Board[/url]
And although it is common knowledge that Wernher von Braun’s rockets took Americans to the moon, some also suspect that another more mysterious German science, the conflict theories of Bismark (which likely inspired Ludendorff’s politics and and Hitler’s Blitzkieigs) were absorbed by American progressives.
‘The Shock Doctrine’ by Naomi Klein is the best known critique of this peculiar science, though her emphasis is on neo-cons rather than on the doings of such people as George Soros. And the book ‘History’s Lost Moments: The Stories Your Teacher Never Told You, Volume 5’ By Tom Horton explores the shock doctrine’s historical antecedents. Modern community organizing, including ‘The Pioneer Little Europe Prospectus,’ also employs a modest amount of this science.
In a book titled ‘Architects of Annihilation,” an effort to explain the mystery of why so many civilian deaths occurred during World War 2, historian Gotz Aly argues that National Socialist Germany had been in possession of a “depopulation science.” And some today, such as the controversial Alex Jones, have argued on this show that something of this nature is in the hands of a global elite with a more daunting agenda.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIWR_bWT87U”%5DThe Shock Doctrine – YouTube[/url]
Ironically, postwar allied propagandists also found that the NSDAP’s message about being “a working class party begun on a shoestring,” instead of something intended to look like that while nurtured from the wings by some of the nation’s most influential war heroes and institutions, yet another blessing. The story was convenient for avoiding any more controversies about the very real class war just fought, so they repeated it all as gospel.
It deceived many an historian, and deceived many a pseudo-National Socialist who thought it could all be done “the same way,” all those who went by what they saw as apparently verified by both sides.
And the latter may be compared to the Schizophrenic who felt unseen forces compelling him to write down all of Bob Dylan’s stream of consciousness words, as he believed just putting them in a reverse order would “reveal the truth.”
Meanwhile, the nobility, as you will hear the lady below explain, continue to think in terms of centuries, far beyond any controversies about their having associated with a 12 year Reich that had gone east to complete the colonization efforts that had been interrupted during WW1.
As for the wars in the east, Hitler’s partners in the nobility had initially supported an expansion to the east, assisted by their memory of relatives who had been murdered in a basement by the Bolsheviks. And Hitler had also said that “I go where I go like a sleepwalker,’ which was an accurate way of saying that he operated within the same inclinations his nation had held for centuries.
But in both World Wars, which few had really understood, new technologies brought new class relationships, and the old order gave way.
Today the nobility is an integral part of the international economy, one in which their assets have continued to balloon. And logic tells them that as super-nationals they will survive somewhere, even if the formerly colonized were to completely swamp all their European living spaces.
As such, we hear no protests out of them about an immigration crisis because of non-White workers, many of nationalities that have worked in their industries since the National Socialists first flooded the country with foreign labor. The elites have chosen their profits, again, instead of embracing any authentic democracy (small d) to represent the preferences of the native people for peace, safety, fairness, and their identity.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3PoSnZIOyU”%5DGerman Nobility, New Horizons 02 – Stephanie countess Bruges von Pfuel | euromaxx – YouTube[/url]
This was written to remind my fellow White Nationalists and PLE supporters that the agendas of yesterday’s warring elites should not necessarily be our own.
Fascism and National Socialism represented varieties of a third way synthesis in Europe that on many levels can be compared with the third way synthesis which occurred in the United States as the New Deal; but Germany and Italy’s own elites departed from that analogy with high risk foreign policies of territorial expansion.
The limitations to that were not so clearly recognized at the time, but this falling out among the traditional elites brought untold suffering to White people in many countries.
“I believe you are trying to do away with the British Empire,” Churchill once told him ([i]Roosevelt[/i]) in private. Of this there is no doubt. “The colonial system means war,” Roosevelt had confided to his son Elliott.
John Toland, on page 51 of ‘The Last 100 Days'[/b]
As an American populist (And not one who’s actually something else and just saying that) I’m not a particularly big booster of Europe’s nobility, though their present role as figureheads and charity promoters is generally in line with my values. I enjoyed the last royal wedding, and have a souvenir cup to remember it.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQmgrF-69pk”%5DRoyal wedding video: Prince William and his bride Kate enjoy first royal wedding day kiss – YouTube[/url]
And so tonight I was perusing a watch and jewelry catalog, the latest from Timepieces International. And I happened to notice quite a glitzy ring on their page 66 for the ladies of the masses that’s inspired by an original worn by the Duchess of Windsor, just as there are already copies of the Diana/ Kate ring.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdJaURVZ7uI”%5DThe Uncrowned Jewels – 1987 BBC News Documentary – YouTube[/url]
As many of you know, that’s the late Wallis Simpson, the National Socialist sympathizer. Her relationship to Edward the VIII led to marriage and cost him the throne, at least that’s the superficial story that the more mainstream British media tells to this day – though historians know much more – to avoid highlighting controversies about class conflict.
Much of the Duchess’s story was detailed out by her biographer, her friend and neighbor Lady Diana Mitford Mosley. Even that version, however, avoided the central issue, when the big question of the last century was which class was going to apply its genius to resolving the economic crisis of each European nation.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gjzEP0S50cM&feature=youtu.be”%5DLady Diana Mosley pt.1 – YouTube[/url]
A former British National Socialist who became an advocate for European unity, along with her husband Sir Oswald Mosley, Diana is probably better known for having been a part of Hitler’s inner social circle before the war. For unlike her husband, she already spoke German in those years. Diana’s sister, Unity Mitford, was also part of that circle.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9kBH47Ohlg&list=PLAD2E7709B79FD557″%5DHITLER’S BRITISH GIRL (1/5) – YouTube[/url]
In the early 1970s, when I was still somewhat obsessive about the war (having been being born on an old British airdrome littered with war debris), I was regularly exchanging letters with Lady Mosley. And exchanging letters with Adelide Pearson Pelley as well; the daughter of the late William Dudley Pelley, the populist leader of America’s Silver Shirts Legion.
Adelide’s dad had authored a social plan to compete with Roosevelt’s own campaign against the “economic royalists,” a book titled ‘No More Hunger.’
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXSI79sIJlU”%5Dpelly and the silver shirts – YouTube[/url]
During this correspondence, and with the innocence of youth, I asked if she’d like a copy of Diana’s book ‘The Duchess of Windsor.’ Adelide was absolutely taken back, and with a still charming American directness she said “You’ve got to be kidding.” And, “We’re really not on the same wavelength about this issue at all.”
It was at that moment that I first came to realize that some cult interests (As they require no critical thinking) were just head on collisions; as some of my contacts leaned more toward the traditional wealthy elites during the war, even fawned over them (Be sure to see the photo below of Hitler being absolutely star-struck as he meets the Kaiser’s son), while others would have been more inclined to apply a few well aimed shots in their direction. [url]https://www.google.com/search?site=&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1366&bih=643&q=hitler+meets+the+kaiser%27s+son&oq=hitler+meets+the+kaiser%27s+son&gs_l=img.12…2898.14143.0.16964.33.9.2.22.24.0.279.779.8j0j1.9.0.msedr…0…1ac.1.64.img..20.13.779.jjVnqGMrEqE#tbm=isch&q=hitler+fawns+over+the+kaiser%27s+son&imgrc=5_Nn9J-c8kTs3M%253A%3BzZ5iP1BBP1TBtM%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.historyplace.com%252Fworldwar2%252Friseofhitler%252Fhitler-prince.jpg%3Bhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.historyplace.com%252Fworldwar2%252Friseofhitler%252Fdictator.htm%3B400%3B331[/url]
As the masses of that time were widely distrustful of the nobility, if not already supportive of a Marxist revolution, Hitler adopted a public posture of being critical and cold to the nobility, while privately engaging them as a largely invisible umbrella for international diplomacy and fundraising.
(And that’s very similar to what Franklin Roosevelt did in America as well.)
The Kaiser accepted that this deception was in the interest of his class, whatever his personal impression of Hitler may have been, so he did not flee his post-revolutionary residence in the Netherlands even after Germany’s invasion. Britain extended an invitation for him to do so, but that would only have made him vulnerable to their prosecution of him as an alleged war criminal. And when he passed away, the German military sent an honor guard with swastika decorated flags to his estate.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5OI5NC_WC8″%5DThe Last German Emperor, Living in Exile in The Netherlands 1918-1941 – YouTube[/url]
I had discovered that the third way solutions offered after WW1 during the crisis of capitalism, including the Mosley and Pelley personality cults, weren’t really one big convenient stereotype, though their opponents thought otherwise. As such, I decided to find out what this especially intriguing mystery and often neglected controversy had been about in its time.
What many still do not know today, is that when Edward VIII relinquished the British throne that his stepping down effectively smoke-screened a far more important turning point in history; involving Britain’s democratic politicians, its aristocrats, and Germany’s Adolf Hitler.
In all cases, none of the parties involved were inclined to speak very directly about it to the masses; therefore those mysterious hints in the film ‘The Battle of Britain’ where the dialogue of the Germans occasionally suggests that Britain wasn’t really viewed by Hitler as the natural enemy. That needs clarifying, however, as it especially meant Britain’s traditional ruling elite wasn’t viewed as the natural enemy
The outcome for the democratically elected politicians was that the abdication discreetly resolved behind the curtain that no King would be dictating key parts of the nation’s foreign and domestic social policies, not now, not ever, for a more modern age had brought that question to a showdown.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1ZPchVWPbY”%5DTheir Royal Heilness – credit The Sun – YouTube[/url]
The democratic leaders (And I say that in a limited sense when referring to the British or American systems) would take Britain out of an economy based on past living space conquests, an approach Hitler had so admired about the British aristocracy and wished to emulate, and into the open and connected economy that the Americans were advocating (Though it has it’s controversies too).
At first Winston Churchill stood with the King, though that left him aligned with the fascist Oswald Mosley and all his friends hidden in the House of Lords (The unelected but sometimes self-described “leadership class”), and there had been talk of forming a King’s Party.
In fact, Churchill had already authored not only a large article describing the Bolshevik Revolution against the Russian nobility as looking quite Jewish, but described Hitler as an appropriate leader for Germany in a book, despite that rather unfortunate but necessary incident with the Brownshirt leadership. After all, he pointed out, there weren’t all that many people killed. And in the November 1936 issue of Strand Magazine said:
“One may dislike Hitler’s system and yet admire his patriotic achievement. If our country were defeated, I hope we should find a champion as indomitable to restore our courage and lead us back to our place among the nations.”
Then Churchill did an astrounding about turn, deciding that it was more prudent to back off during the Abdication Crisis. He came to accept that the old order really was about to come down a few notches, and he had no intention of letting his political fortunes go down with it, so he adjusted his public pronouncements to the new ruling class more aggressively flexing its muscles in Parliament.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lQdSxe6Emg”%5DThe Aristocracy – Letting in the Hoi Polloi: 1945-1970 1st part – YouTube[/url]
[i]Hitler would eventually made a very similar ideological accommodation to the Russian Revolution – just over three and a half months after elements of his own nobility tried to assassinate him. On November 14, 1944, when it was obvious that Russia wasn’t going to be colonized by a German dictatorship backed by most of its traditional elite, he quietly signed a document in front of SS witnesses approving the ‘KNOR Manifesto.’
This advocated a democratic program for the Russians based on a non-Bolshevik interpretation of the Russian Revolution. And there was no longer any allegation about the Jews devaluing this turning point in history for the advocates of a more moderate though slower path to industrialization than Stalin was pursuing. Reference: Steenberg, Sven ‘Vlasov’ New York, New York: Alfred A Knopf 1970 pg. 157
Marxists tend to apply a certain dictum to such processes, “The ruling ideas of any epoch are the ideas of its ruling class,” but the original inspiration can be credited to Hegel. [url]https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t799052/[/url]
[url=”http://www.amazon.com/Decline-Fall-British-Aristocracy/dp/0375703683/ref=sr_1_24?ie=UTF8&qid=1439368436&sr=8-24&keywords=oswald+mosley”%5DThe Decline and Fall of the British Aristocracy: David Cannadine: 9780375703683: Amazon.com: Books[/url]
In postwar pseudo-National Socialism (An advocacy of a stagnant non-Volksgemeinschaft or non-community NS cultism) these adjustments by Churchill, and later by Hitler, were both neglected. Churchill’s change of mind went unexplained even when George Lincoln Rockwell reprinted Churchill’s commentary on the Bolshevik Revolution. And Hitler’s transition into post-colonialism went totally unnoticed.[/i]
In Britain the social welfare would have to be left until after the war, if a war really was coming. So the King departed to Austria, without any official questioning of his patriotism, received financial support from the government, relocated to the Bahamas to serve the nation – where he’d obviously be out of touch with his friends – and retired to France afterwards.
One of Mosley’s right hand men, Harold Nicolson, also adopted Churchill’s new direction, and eventually he was appointed by Churchill to lead the war ministry. Charles Lindbergh later took up residence in Nicolson’s home, and after personally observing a Blackshirt rally he recorded in his writings that it wasn’t for him either.
The outcome of the abdication crisis for Hitler had been that his secret alliance with nobles all across Europe (Which included Hermann Goring’s wife Carin) didn’t include Edward the VIII, whose geopolitical restraint would have greatly facilitated Germany’s invasion of West Poland, to populate it with ethnic Germans, and Russia, to acquire vast resources that would have made Germany a superpower to rival the US.
Hitler’s preferred foreign policy would have been to have Britain’s ruling class as an ally, Russia as an opponent, and German diplomacy was left to the nobleman (by adoption) Joachim von Ribbentrop.
Hitler was relying on Ribbentrop, not the other way around, and so the moment Ribbentrop’s efforts resulted in a general war over the issue of Poland, Hitler was astonished. And witnesses remember him turning to Ribbentrop, and asking: What now?
But beyond those circumstances, it would be Hitler’s war, as expressed by the following introduction on Amazon books for David Irving’s book ‘The War Path.’ [i]From February 1933, when he told his generals in secret of his ambition to conquer the East, to September 3, 1939, when he left the Berlin Chancellery for the Polish front, Adolf Hitler had one obsessive goal – to wage war and achieve German revenge and hegemony. [/i]
The transition between the ruling classes happened very quickly in Britain, and was quietly decided behind the scenes, but while the war was raging in Poland Rudolf Hess made his flight to Scotland. He thought Britain’s traditional ruling class could still decide the foreign policy, but he was mistaken.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ya00Tphwwic”%5DUnsolved Mysteries – WORLD WAR 2 – The Riddle of Rudolph Hess – PART 3/3 – YouTube[/url]
During the Battle of Britain Churchill led his countrymen into signing a “Lend Lease” agreement with the United States. But anyone inspecting the small print can also discern that it’s part of an agreement for Britain (facing a hardball opportunism from the US) to eventually phase out the colonization business and to more effectively deal with a German leader who believed that old style expansion across East Europe had a future.
[i]It seems unlikely that Oswald Mosley understood the full dimensions of the Zeitgeist though, as he not only advocated colonial behaviors in his 1939 speech at Earl’s Court, but continued to do so even when his book ‘Mosley Right or Wrong’ was published in 1961.
Although decolonialism was the direction history was taking, the evidence that it was more about the expansion of American business interests rather than a completely idealistic campaign, can be clearly seen in what would happen after World War Two:
In 1946, when the French seized Viet Nam in the name of renewed colonialism, the United States approved and armed the French. This had the effect of actually further radicalizing the Vietnamese patriot Ho Chi Minh, an admirer of the American Declaration of Independence.
American business later succeeded French colonialism, but as a temporary surrogate of colonialism it obstructed free elections rather than risk any threat to the traditionally privileged, those who owned most of the country. That brought continuing horrors and the Vietnam War, and remarkably, was similar to the decision to buck the Zeitgeist that had already brought Germany so much anguish.[/i]
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=poVbzyjk1-4″%5DDUKE OF COBURG HITLER´S FAVORITE ROYAL PART 1 – YouTube[/url]
Hitler practiced a style of governing largely intended to substitute for a more visual monarchy, and there were hints of it throughout the party decorations.
But his economy was still a shade more democratic, and more modern, than the Kaiser’s was, as the German people were to become an extended part of the privileged elite over all other Europeans.
The substitutions offered a continuity that wasn’t a hard thing to sell either, as Germans had never really experienced democracy to its roots even during the Weimar years, as the nobility and the General Staff were in a position to obstruct anyone who took all that too seriously.
And the loss of the connection to Edward VIII, with Diana Mosley in a key diplomatic role (Just as her husband’s family had traditionally served that role for a previous British king), was a disappointment to Hitler and the nobles who had been encouraging his rise to prominence.
Before the Putsch the most help – outside of donations coming from a wide variety of ordinary people – had come from White Russian emigrees in Germany who wished to be returned to ruling Russia, but after the unsuccessful Putsch most of the help had come from business leaders and German nobles who were inclined to launch an entirely German serving colonizing campaign to the east.
Lady Mosley downplayed her own pre-WW2 diplomatic role, which wasn’t successful anyway, and given the hostile postwar climate for her views, that was necessary. Her safety was also enabled by the victors; for even the transcript of personal conversations between Hitler and Edward after he gave up the throne in 1936 – as Lady Mosley also recounts in her book – vanished from the captured war time files (during the post WW2 campaign to quietly recover the nobles).
Yes, the nobility and a Russian invasion had been at the back of Hitler’s mind since those earliest days of the NSDAP, when the party paraded for a very revealing first time in Coburg on October 14 & 15, 1922, where the Romanov claimants to the Russia throne had retreated to live on an estate near the German nobility.
These claimants, endorsed by the NSDAP, were Kirill and Viktoria Ramanov. And they knew the value of influencing German foreign policy as soon as possible. Kirill had his own fortune and his connection to Henry Ford to back the NSDAP. And Viktoria, closely related to British royalty, drew from her assets in Britain. (Ref: page 157 The Russian Roots of National Socialism by Michael Kellog Published by Cambridge University Press, UK in 2005.)
As this area of inquiry lacks the wider selection of materials it deserves because of an intentional neglect by the vested interests, who were responsible for the closing of royal archives to researchers all across Europe, I’ll include this title as well: ‘Royals & The Reich’ by Jonathan Petropoulos, Oxford University Press, UK, 2006[/i] This is useful for anyone who actually wants to see the names of the many aristocrats who were quietly woven into the fabric of “the German worker’s party.”
[i]Additionally, while the European masses weren’t reading a lot into the matter, Coburg is also the ancestral home of the British royal family Saxe Coburg-Gotha, more often referred to as Windsor. And on page 144 Lady Mosley recounts that the Duke of Saxe Coburg and Gotha was sent to King Edward VIII with confidential messages from Hitler.[/i]
Reference Mein Kampf for the day of the first party parade in Coburg, on “German Day,” and you’ll quickly notice that the people who invited Hitler to come in strength for such an extraordinary occasion are casually left unnamed. This was the “secret royal event” that resulted in the party’s first campaign badge.
This was also the first day that the NSDAP publicly paraded its flag, which employed the red, white, and black colors of the German monarchy – with a swastika in the middle. And what the swastika really meant in the early years of the NSDAP, despite a popular interpretation to this day, is revealed clearly by connecting three closely occurring NSDAP events:
* The swastika flag was officially adopted by Hitler’s NSDAP August 7, 1920 at the Salzburg Congress.
* In the September 1920 issue of the Volkischer Beobachter (Volkisch Observer), there appeared a story written by an NSDAP foreign advisor, Shabelskii-Bork, who had once served as an official investigator into the murder of the Romanov’s in the Yekaterinburg basement.
The details, which were certainly known even earlier in the party, included a mention of the swastika that the Czarina secretly etched on an upstairs window ledge, when there was still a hope of her family being rescued. The article also recounted that a book she had been reading included ‘The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion within its cover,’ which alleged that there was a Jewish conspiracy to take over the world.
* And during the NSWPP’s Coburg March on October 14 & 15, 1922, the flag was prominently displayed publicly for the first time.
The swastika was the Cazarina’s personal sign, it adorned her diary as well (Available on Amazon), and soon became a compelling symbol for many about wreaking a merciless vengence upon the Bolsheviks – especially the Jews who were known to have been among them – for what they had done.
Soon after the story appeared, the VB became the NSDAPs official organ. And although most of Hitler’s dependence on White Russian emigres ended with the unsuccessful Putsch, and turned more decisively to soliciting the support of German nobles, he saw no reason to abandon the swastika.
And remarkably, despite all of this being publicly documented in English, German, Russian, and many other languages, it’s rare to encounter anyone even today who’s conscious of this especially significant connection to the swastika, rather than the countless other associations covered in the following video:
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4PRRS2NGRc”%5DThe True History & Story of The Swastika Symbol. – YouTube[/url]
Coburg had also been, it is especially important to grasp, the place for royalist plots since the ambitious Prince Albert first set his sights on Queen Victoria. He intended to produce enough children of their own master race to be distributed by marriage into all the European power centers. Reference: ‘The Coburg Conspiracy’ by Richard Sotnick: Ephesus Publishing, UK 2008
[i]That “master race” concept offered centuries of tradition to validate it, and was a far cry from the often impoverished and frequently mixed race people who so often present their countenances on behalf of today’s non-community (or non-Volksgemeinschaft building) NS bachelor cults. [/i]
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roZhbBoHGm8″%5DVictoria and Albert: Part 1 – YouTube[/url]
That plan largely succeeded after Albert’s death because Victoria remained loyal to it, and it lasted until the blood relations fell out with each other. Then the carnage of WW1 began and continued until there was widespread social disorder; including in Russia and later in Germany.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7kp3vf1uKA”%5DOrigins of World War I (1 of 2) – YouTube[/url]
That’s when both the Russian and German nobility retreated behind the political curtain. Ex-National Socialist Otto Strasser confirms this tactic in his book ‘Hitler & I” and recorded what he saw of Hitler playing the political game with a royal flush up his sleeve. The communists and democratic forces fought in the streets for what they innocently thought would be the leadership of the masses, but much of Hitler’s movement was pure theatre.
But soon the nobility was financially backing political alternatives on the right that held them in much higher esteem, those who were interested in picking up exactly where the WW1 dictatorship of Erich Ludendorff and colonization in East Europe had left off.
In 1919 Ludendorff had already played a key role in artificially inserting Lenin into a destabilized Russia, as Lenin was willing to take Russia out of WW1 and fulfilled that promise. It is apparently unknown if any of the countless Jews among the Bolsheviks thanked Ludendorff for his help. The following is what Winston Churchill said about it in the House of Commons:
“Lenin was sent into Russia by the Germans in the same way that you might send a phial containing a culture of typhoid or cholera to be poured into the water supply of a great city, and it worked with amazing accuracy.”
But despite that absolutely amazing art of political puppetry, the German General staff wasn’t very happy when Bolshevism eventually spread to Germany anyway, challenging its own ancien régime. Many Jews are experts at fanning even the most painful Zeitgeist, and historians usually neglect to notice that so was Ludendorff.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frjt452YzkM”%5DFall of Eagles – Sealed Train Decision (9m) – YouTube[/url]
Then following World War 1, it is important to notice, Ludendorff is seen assisting Hitler in very similar circumstances of social disorder before 1923. Yes, he asserted he was in retirement, but there are indicators that he was actually working with the secret service in an effort to do the very same thing again!
The evidence is that he brought along his most brilliant secret service agents and financial contacts to quietly nurture the NSDAP. These were mostly drawn from East Europe at the conclusion of WW1. And symbolically, the party was soon supplied with the exact same brown shirts that had once been delegated to the last colonizing (& genocide) effort by Germany in West Africa.
The Ludendorff faction would have assured the nobility and the General Staff that Hitler would be Germany’s ideal man to lead the masses. As a gifted speaker he had faithfully taken on even the most unpleasant tasks. And the advisors of the Russia aristocrats educated Hitler on the need to eventually go East, when the time was right.
Hitler was also provided with one of Germany’s most effective secret agents, Dr. Max Erwin von Scheubner-Richter, who had become a noble through marriage. His biographer described him as Germany’s equivalent to Lawrence of Arabia. In Mein Kampf Hitler describes him as the only man among the fallen he could not replace. Scheubner-Richter was also the political leader of the White Russian elite which had taken refuge with their German cousins.
And although the Ludendorff / Hitler attempt at a Putsch failed in 1923, by 1933 Hitler was legally elected. And when a controversy about the faithfulness of many Brownshirt leaders erupted in 1934, Hitler demonstrated to the supportive aristocrats of the army that they had indeed chosen wisely.
The following link will take you to a PLE article that details it all in painstaking detail, because it’s very important to understand that the World Wars were not ordinary contests between the nations of Europe – something one can just re-fight for a different outcome – but a sometimes hidden contest for the masses that even the communists could not discern properly.
[url]https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1063936/[/url]
In fact, Hitler could sound so authentically left wing, much as he would mimic a host of characters for his guests, that when the critical moment came the Marxists turned their attention to opposing the more familiar advocates of a modern democracy instead.
And it’s vital to know, even during postwar de-Nazification by the Allied powers, that this controversy about the nobility was intentionally downplayed in front of the masses. In fact, it’s rare to see anyone or any resource mention it today.
[url]https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1063935/[/url]
Essentially what all this means is that the fascists and the National socialists of Europe were in a low profile alliance with the key players of European nobility. That began well before the war, and continued throughout the alliance’s successful years. It comprised a second daring effort from Coburg, and with many centuries of experience they were confident of success.
In Italy, for example, King Emmanuel was already being advised by fascist intellectuals well before Mussolini’s “March on Rome,” which wasn’t as much a seizure of power as a planned public spectacle that gave the King the opportunity to say: ” I had no choice but to give in to the dictatorship”
After the war, as the victors fully intended to absorb the wealth and status of the nobility into their own systems, their newsreels produced for the good natured common folk emphasized everything except the nobility. In England, for example, all the prewar newsreels of Sir Oswald Mosley’s unusually large public gatherings were successfully sequestered by the government owned BBC for nearly a lifetime.
By 1993, When ‘The Remains of the Day’ starring Anthony Hopkins was released, most of the audience even wondered why they were seeing a member of the wealthy elite actually taking the time to meet with a contingent of uniformed British fascists, those who they were long conditioned into viewing as eccentric nobodies, flies on the windscreen of history.
[url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Remains_of_the_Day_(film[/url])
That adventure, though it was only visible in the intentionally small print of the Nuremberg Trials, was officially referred to as “de-nobilization.” A more honest term for the latter, however, would have been reorganized-nobilization, as there was never an attempt to completely dismantle or outlaw them in the same manner as their National Socialist partners (or middle men) in power, rather, the goal was to realign with them.
Additionally, and this is one of the most amazing and mysterious details: In the last days of the war the massive NSDAP membership list wasn’t even destroyed (Though the names of supporting nobles who were not party members had always been handled discreetly).
This also diverted attention – whether intentional or not by those responsible – away from many powerful people.
Yes, there had been an order directly from Hitler to destroy all those records, as the files were entrusted to an unnamed military officer (whether he was a noble or not isn’t recorded) to be destroyed by pulping at a local mill.
For nine days the trucks rolled into the mill with the membership files, information on more than 8 million people, with an identifying photo attached, and weighing over fifty tons. But the officer didn’t stay around to verify their fate, which was entrusted to the manager, a non-party civilian named Herr Hubner. And eventually he gave it all to the allies.
For the party, as an entity quite different from the rest of Germany, the betrayal was a devastating blow leaps and bounds beyond any other political set-back it had ever experienced, including the Night of the Long Knifes or the later defection of many nobles; for all those names were like throwing the full catch as bloodied bait for all the circling sharks.
And though the damage sustained by the party far exceeded those setbacks combined, neither the allies nor the “post-war National Socialists” with shoestring budgets and vast ambitions generally tended to highlight it.
They jointly embraced a more distracting history of the NSDAP, though it didn’t really add up for the less gullible, a mere skeleton of truth that operates like this:
* 1933: Hitler appears to come to power in a simple miracle of personal political mastery. Or does he? Over on the left, with many decades to examine that turning point and the known talents of their adversary Hitler, many have become quite clear on the larger circumstances that bested them. In his ‘A People’s History of the World,’ this is what Chris Harman’s critique of his fellow Marxists says:
[i]What gave the Nazis power was the decision by key representatives of the ruling class to hand it to them. There had long been sections of big business which gave money to the Nazis, seeing them as a useful counterweight to the left and the unions.
The newspaper magnate Hugenburg had relieved Hitler’s financial dilemmas in his early years. By 1931 Fritz Thyssen, a leading Ruhr industrialist, was ‘a keen Nazi supporter,’ and the former national bank chief Schacht was increasingly sympathetic.[/i]
And Chris Harman doesn’t include this, and obviously countless other details that would confirm the matter, but even the head of the Kaiser Wilhelm Society was aboard long before Hitler came to power.
The KWS was able to offer an extensive list of social planning departments. But with most of its other political records destroyed by 1945, many still prefer to believe that the regime’s complete reorganization of society spawned narrowly from Mein Kampf and Hitler staying up late at night to brainstorm with his intimates.
* 1934: The NSDAP’s Alliance with the Zionists: Although this is certainly well documented today, for over a half century the masters of propaganda managed to keep a firm lid on this subject; therefore the special contempt that many Jews and postwar NS cultists were able to more freely express toward one another – instead of ever understanding more clearly the processes of history and the realm of practical politics.
* 1934: The Röhm-Strasser Purge, involving all those “typically corrupt” and now allegedly conspiratorial peasants, receives a lot of emphasis, while little or no emphasis is placed on these observations: That Hitler meets with the munitions maker Krupp immediately before and is told to clean this up. As he’s a member of the nobility, the man’s full name is Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach
Nor is the observation that Prince Christoph accompanied Goring throughout the campaign of arrests and executions deemed significant, or that Goering’s own genealogy included princes, queens, and other nobility since the twelfth century (Nuremberg Interviews by Leon Goldensohn Knopf / Doubleday 2007 pg. 105)
Nor is much said of the class nature of the SS, the force which went in to settle the Brownshirt controversy, though industrialists occupied many of its highest positions. Himmler’s first name, Heinrich, was that of his godfather, Prince Heinrich of Bavaria, a member of the royal family of Bavaria,
[i]And near the end of the war this card is played again: When Himmler is sent to the east, by November of 1944 he’s releasing Jews from the camps. And as Jewish historians know, it wasn’t always to get anything during the war, but about securing his survival afterwards. The act can also be attributed to the influence of the nobility, as it was much more in line with their values than Hitler’s.
The big estates of Pomerania received almost all of Himmler’s protection. This allowed the nobility to evacuate, and the Russians opted for the easier drive on Berlin. The rapes, murders, tortures, and pillaging against ordinary Germans soon followed, but innocent observers opined that Himmler just wasn’t a good tactician.
But despite Himmler’s negotiations, at the end of the war he died under mysterious circumstances while in the hands of the British. And his death, which had many of the hallmarks of an assassination, fitted very well into the allies’ postwar plans to recover the nobility for themselves without any complications about surviving National Socialist frontmen.[/i]
* 1941: The Flight of Rudolf Hess to Scotland: This is treated as “a mystery,” and it’s made a lot of money for authors who churn out books for people who want to poke in the ashes, including the book “Rudolf Hess, Prisoner of Peace. But it becomes much less of a mystery as soon as anyone realizes that Britain’s old ruling class was pushed aside shortly before Hess arrived in Scotland, and that it was a painful class matter settled behind the scenes. Hess asked to speak to the Duke of Hamilton, but there was really nothing this trusted contact could do for the tragically uninformed foreigner.
* 1944: During the Count von Struffenberg plot – even with aristocratic titles showing up left, right, and center in any traditional telling – there’s actually no emphasis on the aristocrats being all that threatening; however, in Shelley Baranowsi’s book ‘The Sanctity of Rural Life’ she records on page 186 that nearly a third of those executed were nobles.
And although Hitler publicly downplayed what was a revolutionary attempt from the highest social level, which included even his nationally popular Field Marshal Erwin Rommel (whose mother Helene had a tie to minor German nobility), he was so rocked that he felt compelled to pass emergency legislation to specifically curtail the privileges of the nobles as his diplomatic network over Europe.
But he does not completely disassociate them, as that hidden face of the German establishment was too entwined with everything the party had ever done.
* 1945: The mysteriously convenient availability of the NSDAP files for all the postwar war crimes trials is almost never mentioned anywhere either, nor the reason the private records of the NSDAP leaders were so often recovered for the allied prosecutors only after the trail passed through the estates or castles of the nobility. These included 47 crates of files from Alfred Rosenberg, the philosopher of National Socialism, which were found concealed under the castle of nobleman Baron Kurt von Behr, his “chief aid.” But even the Internet offers very little information on him.
The allies took the breathtaking gift of the NSDAP membership files, with its 8 million plus supporters and years of explanatory details, and produced punched cards. Then they fed the information into one of the world’s first computers. An extensive reference on this event is Fredrick Taylor’s ‘Exorcising Hitler,’ published in 2011 by Bloomsburg Press, New York.
In the case of the nobility, whom the allies were a lot less informed about unless a person was actually on the party membership list, most were viewed as untarnished.
And this is why so many Nuremberg judges and lawyers, if they held enough social status themselves, attended the parties of the nobility even while the trials were in progress; for the vast estates in the undisturbed tranquility of the countryside, and the international investments of the nobility, were not erased by the destruction.
These gatherings presented opportunities for the hosts to ask the masters of the law, if they were inclined to ask, to do whatever they could to save this or that National Socialist leader from too punishing a sentence, whether incarceration or death; serving as character witnesses in the wings. The Faber-Castell family, for example, traditionally welcomed whoever was in control.
And when the war was over, they were free to contact blood relations even in the democratic nations about applying some heat to someone’s backside. A great favorite of the nobility, for example, was Albert Speer.
Speer’s arrest took place at Schloss Glucksburg castle in Schleswig-Holstein, a German state near the border to Denmark. The castle was built in a lake by Nikel Karies, between 1583 and 1587 for Duke Johann the Younger of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EXy6W9y8AiA”%5DSchloss Glücksburg Water Castle Palace FPV 2014 – YouTube[/url]
King Christian IX of Denmark was the first King to take up residence there. He has been called the father-in-law of Europe, as four of his children married into the Royal houses of Sweden, England and Russia. A son and grandson became kings of Greece and Norway respectively.
Descendants of this especially well connected branch of international royalty were still in residence at the time of Speer’s arrest in their home, but it’s rare to see any mention of that in all the press accounts issued over the decades. And eventually Speer was free, despite being being very deeply involved in the war and among Hitler’s closest confidants.
According to Smithsonian.com, during Speer’s interrogation there by Paul Nitze he explained how he had reduced the influence of the military and the Nazi Party in decision-making, and how he had substituted Henry Ford’s more modern manufacturing principles to run the factories efficiently.
However, many higher ranking NSDAP members, who had so loyally served the nobles and only entertained ideas of completely supplanting them in the last and losing days of the war, received a harsh punishment, while the allies quietly let even tarnished nobility out the back door.
But why, anyone with any curiosity might ask, hadn’t Hitler in 1945 entrusted the NSDAP’s membership files – along with proper funding – either to the Schutzstaffel (abbreviated as SS), wartime Werwolves, or some other agency bursting with enthusiasm for a postwar revival of the party?
The Reich had, for example, sent weapons technology to Japan, wealth to Switzerland, refugees to Spain, Argentina, and countless other safe havens. But the NSDAP files were slated for complete destruction. Arthur Axmann, for example, received little more than Hitler’s personal sidearm.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYyWDcpPPKc”%5DHitler’s Final Moments – YouTube[/url]
As you will see, this is not much of a mystery: Hitler would have recognized that an ancient way of life, predicated on absolute obedience to one person physically expanding the empire, was passing away decisively, though he had temporarily revived that type of economy for a last hurrah in a somewhat more modern form. The best thing to do with the now obsolete membership files, which had a percentage of visible aristocrats woven into them, was to destroy all them in the interest of everyone’s safety.
Additionally, signalling a need to return to a semi-democratic arrangement in Germany as well, Hitler’s Last Will And Testement reverted to a Weimar style arrangement for appointments:
Yes, Admiral Karl Döenitz would become the Staatsoberhaupt (Head of State), with the titles of Reichspräsident (President) and Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces; but Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels would be the Head of Government with the title of Reichskanzler (Chancellor). Goebbels served only one day and committed suicide.
[i]Goebbels’ siblings transferred the rights to his writings to Swiss banker François Genoud, who, prior to his death in 1996, transferred the rights to Cordula Schacht. Her father, Hjalmar Schacht, was Adolf Hitler’s economics minister in the 1930s The controversies about what’s actually supposed to be in them, and what’s not, have continued to this day.[/i] [url=http://fpp.co.uk/bookchapters/JG/index.html]Real History and Dr Joseph Goebbels[/url]
And to highlight that this would actually be a more modern government than Weimar, despite the wasteland of bricks and bomb crater holes in the streets, the nobility’s representatives at Hitler’s side, Göring and Himmler, were expelled.
The results in a modern war had turned out badly, as colonial economies tend not to coordinate their attacks in the manner that connected economies do. The allies found the results conducive to denying that there had ever been any legitimacy or rationality to National Socialism.
But Hitler’s authority was actually legally sustained by not only the Weimar Constitution, and the Enabling Act of March 23, 1933, but other laws as well. And although the political system of that time still retained a medieval footing, his rule was still more democratically endorsed than the Kaiser’s rule had been.
The allies also kept the NSDAP’s history and the nobility’s history separated when possible, classifying much as top secret, though in reality the uneasy relationship overlapped and intertwined throughout the history of the NSDAP. The Nuremberg Trials were selective, and permitted the masses to see a public show of heads rolling.
The manufactured legend of Hitler the worker from nowhere, instead of a faction of the military’s secret service, soon became the edited myth of Hitler the social outcast from the gutter. And the Soviets provided a corresponding view of Hitler as a leader who emerged from the Lumpen Proletariat (worse part of the working class).
This would nip in the bud anything that might boost the impression among the Russian people that the NSDAP had initially been partly about a revival of the Russian nobility’s prospects, and that Hitler had changed that footing for a colonial war in league with German nobility.
Even Hitler’s best general, Manstein, had a prominent Romanov in his background, for in the 1905 marriage of the Crown Prince William to the duchess Cecilie Mecklenburg Schwerin (whose mother was the granddaughter of Tsar Nicholas I), as a youth he had served as Cecile’s page.
And when a Soviet book on Hitler was constructed for Stalin, it is important to notice that it left out virtually anything of significance about the NSDAP in its White Russian phase, everything from 1919 until the attempted Putsch of 1923 (And for some reason, everything until 1933 as well).
As Stalin was a student of history, he may have known that the French Revolution had also required being won twice; first internally, then by repelling outside forces intent on restoring the old order.
And while defeat decided a very important economics question, that the age of colonialism and dictatorship was over for most of Western Europe, the drama of Hitler’s lost agenda complicated all his other social questions as well; for much had been dovetailed or spun to fit that long range agenda.
And there’s a difference, which usually goes unnoticed even by the most astute opponents who prefer consistencies, between the portrait of the Jews provided by Hitler and his designated philosopher, Rosenberg.
Hitler’s view is more agenda driven, so his uncompromising propaganda picks up exactly where the Romanovs left off, while Rosenberg applies a more intellectual or candid signature, suggesting that if the Jews hadn’t existed that the world would have had to invent them.
Germany’s colonial agenda had required the making of a hierarchy of White nationalities as well; those fit for ruling and those fit only for being ruled. But the war had awakened long slumbering national aspirations, and this became part of the momentum which caused Germany to withdraw. That would also contribute, decades later, to the rapid withdrawal of Bolshevism.
Any future social questions would have to be left to a new type of man (and woman, as is said in our own time), leading a movement quite different from the NSDAP, but being especially conscious of what it really was all about in its own time.
The loss of the war brought enormous changes to the German economy and the class interactions within it. The Soviets, for example, eventually broke up the many massive estates held by single owners all across East Prussia. These estates had been as big as many state parks in the US, and occasionally were the gifts Hitler bestowed on generals who successfully expanded the living space.
And even when the Soviet vision of a worker’s paradise failed, and the Russians withdrew as well, those now more modestly sized properties in many more hands offered perfect kindling to spread the already roaring West German economy. And Germany, at least from an economic stance, increased it’s influence over Europe again.
The Western allies thought they were being practical, but erred disastrously when they outlawed the legal concept of the German community as somehow suspect. It was actually a proto-National Socialist concept, little different to respecting the boundaries of any ethnic national community in the world. And because of the blunder, Germans were left without a normal legal footing when a flood of immigrants began to colonize them.
But temporarily the allies left National Socialist currency circulating in their postwar world, approved for permanent use countless well thought out National Socialist laws all across the nation; including some especially important international agreements. And in legal controversies about the wealth still in the hands of the families of prominent National Socialsts, sometimes the decisions went in their favor.
There were also countless cases of alleged war criminals actually winning in Germany’s postwar court when they defended their right to remain free. Among the more famous were the cases of SS leaders Heinz Reinefarth, Heinz Lammerding, and Klaas Carel Faber who lived until 2012.
[url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edda_G%C3%B6ring#/media/File:Image_of_an_adult_Edda_G%C3%B6ring,_daugther_of_Hermann_G%C3%B6ring.gif[/url]
They also welcomed many former National Socialists into the founding of what became the European Union; because Germany already had much more experience than any other nation with laying the bare bones of such a connected economy more narrowly on the continent during the war.
A long list of former National Socialist philosophers were also eventually re-engaged with the new establishment’s academia, including Martin Heidegger, though many still weren’t sure what he was saying. And Carl Schmitt, who had been Hitler’s top jurist, picked up a very strong following internationally; including many of America’s key decision makers.
By 1955 Erich von Manstein was deemed worthy enough to be called upon by the Amt Blank to formulate plans for the re-founding of the German Army
[url=http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/archive/index.php/t-452543.html]Is any Third Reich legislation still in force? [Archive] – Straight Dope Message Board[/url]
And although it is common knowledge that Wernher von Braun’s rockets took Americans to the moon, some also suspect that another more mysterious German science, the conflict theories of Bismark (which likely inspired Ludendorff’s politics and and Hitler’s Blitzkieigs) were absorbed by American progressives.
‘The Shock Doctrine’ by Naomi Klein is the best known critique of this peculiar science, though her emphasis is on neo-cons rather than on the doings of such people as George Soros. And the book ‘History’s Lost Moments: The Stories Your Teacher Never Told You, Volume 5’ By Tom Horton explores the shock doctrine’s historical antecedents. Modern community organizing, including ‘The Pioneer Little Europe Prospectus,’ also employs a modest amount of this science.
In a book titled ‘Architects of Annihilation,” an effort to explain the mystery of why so many civilian deaths occurred during World War 2, historian Gotz Aly argues that National Socialist Germany had been in possession of a “depopulation science.” And some today, such as the controversial Alex Jones, have argued on this show that something of this nature is in the hands of a global elite with a more daunting agenda.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIWR_bWT87U”%5DThe Shock Doctrine – YouTube[/url]
Ironically, postwar allied propagandists also found that the NSDAP’s message about being “a working class party begun on a shoestring,” instead of something intended to look like that while nurtured from the wings by some of the nation’s most influential war heroes and institutions, yet another blessing. The story was convenient for avoiding any more controversies about the very real class war just fought, so they repeated it all as gospel.
It deceived many an historian, and deceived many a pseudo-National Socialist who thought it could all be done “the same way,” all those who went by what they saw as apparently verified by both sides.
And the latter may be compared to the Schizophrenic who felt unseen forces compelling him to write down all of Bob Dylan’s stream of consciousness words, as he believed just putting them in a reverse order would “reveal the truth.”
Meanwhile, the nobility, as you will hear the lady below explain, continue to think in terms of centuries, far beyond any controversies about their having associated with a 12 year Reich that had gone east to complete the colonization efforts that had been interrupted during WW1.
As for the wars in the east, Hitler’s partners in the nobility had initially supported an expansion to the east, assisted by their memory of relatives who had been murdered in a basement by the Bolsheviks. And Hitler had also said that “I go where I go like a sleepwalker,’ which was an accurate way of saying that he operated within the same inclinations his nation had held for centuries.
But in both World Wars, which few had really understood, new technologies brought new class relationships, and the old order gave way.
And just as Germany had already obstructed British colonialism in Ireland during WW!, supplying arms to the rebels, the rivalry between nations had inclined Churchill and many others to support the idea of obstructing Germany’s plan to recover Poland.
After the Second World war Ireland’s President Éamon de Valera paid tribute to his old challenger Churchill, acknowledging that he was a great Englishman but could not forebear from also describing him as “a dangerous enemy of the Irish people.”
The greatness associated with Hitler will have a similar reduction in the history books, as he opposed self determination for the Poles, Russians, and many others even during a common threat from Bolshevism.
Many Poles, in particular, were astonished postwar historians neglected their own losses of the war, focusing almost exclusively on the attrition of Jews (ref. Forgotten Holocaust – The Poles Under German Occupation 1939-1944 by Richard Lukas: Univ. Press of Kentucky / Hippocrene Books, N.Y. 1986-2005).
Today the nobility of Europe is an integral part of the international economy, one in which their assets have continued to balloon. And logic tells them that as super-nationals they will survive somewhere, even if the formerly colonized were to completely swamp all their European living spaces.
As such, we hear no protests out of them about an immigration crisis because of non-White workers, many of nationalities that have worked in their industries since the National Socialists first flooded the country with foreign labor. The elites have chosen their profits, again, instead of embracing any authentic democracy (small d) to represent the preferences of the native people for peace, safety, fairness, and their identity.
[url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3PoSnZIOyU”%5DGerman Nobility, New Horizons 02 – Stephanie countess Bruges von Pfuel | euromaxx – YouTube[/url]
This was written to remind my fellow White Nationalists and PLE supporters that the agendas of yesterday’s warring elites should not necessarily be our own.
Fascism and National Socialism represented varieties of a third way synthesis in Europe that on many levels can be compared with the third way synthesis which occurred in the United States as the New Deal, after Roosevelt reached an accommodation with his own nation’s elites; but Germany and Italy departed from that analogy with high risk foreign policies of territorial expansion.
The limitations to that were not so clearly recognized at the time, but this falling out among the traditional elites brought untold suffering to White people in many countries.
H. Michael Barrett
* If you’re interested in more of these articles, be sure to hit the rep button. And there’s much more information on these links:
[url]h
ttps://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1063936/[/url]
[url]https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t799052/[/url]
‘The Origins of Pseudo-National Socialism.’ [url]https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t828308
The Pioneer European 
